Team:SDU-Denmark/Tour40

Results

"I know that I am intelligent, because I know that I know nothing." – Socrates

The next few pages will guide you through the results of the characterization of our submitted parts. On this page, you will find short description of our results, leading you to the final result. We hope you will dig deeper into the results of our systems. After the need to prioritize subprojects, the aim of our project was to get E. coli to express a self-designed nutritional protein tasting of lemon, controlled by an inducible promoter.

Synthesis of self-designed protein OneProt

Pictures of worms/WB
Growth curve

Controlling the Tet promoter

Dose response to doxycycline.

In order for us to be able to control the amount of OneProt produced, we need a promoter that can be controlled. For this, we put OneProt under expressional control by pTet. Besides investigating the controllable expression, we also investigated the influence of the LVA tag on TetR. We proved that the inhibition of pTet by TetR is correlated with the concentration of inducer – the more inducer in the less inhibition of pTet. Comparing the expression by pTet controlled by TetR with and without LVA tag shows that there is a higher expression upon induction, using TetR with LVA than using TetR without LVA. We also show that the pTet is leaky.

Flavor improvement

The thought of eating E. coli does not sound that delicious – and that is why we want our OneProt to taste like lemon. The cloning did not succeed, however, we have been able to compare an odor free E. coli strain with an indole producing E. coli strain, which is the compound that gives E. coli in LB media its characteristic odor. We have proved that

Added parts and devices

To the great iGEM registry of biobricks we have added 3 basic parts, 2 regulatory devices and 4 regulable production devices.