Team:SDU-Denmark/Tour51

An expert opinion

Outreach in Ghana

By generating nutrition made of bacteria our team pointed at contributing to the considerable task of providing accurate nutrient to third world countries. The contradiction between common opinion of how food is produced and of finding a solution on obtaining food in the future has been a key issue to our project. Furthermore, the ethical and social aspects to our project are decisive to include.

This means that we have considered what good research is. Good research includes the common opinion in society, and for this reason outreach in Ghana provided understanding of different standpoints to our project.

Interview, Dr. Yaa Difie-Osei:

Dr. Yaa Difie-Osie from the National Biosafety Committee, Ghana.

Senior Lecturer in Biochemistry, Dr. Yaa Difie-Osei (Dr. Yaa), agreed to meet with our team member, Anne, during her stay in the capital of Ghana Accra in August. The purpose was to talk about GMOs in relation to our Edible coli. The interview was held at the Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology at the University of Ghana, Legon. Dr. Yaa had previously worked at the university herself but was retired from her position as lecturer. Unlike most who retire due to many years of service, Dr. Yaa is still involved in the development of synthetic biology in Ghana as a member of the National Biosafety Committee of Ghana. The fact that Dr. Yaa has much experience regarding synthetic biology and at the same time is a member of the National Biosafety Committee means that her expertise relates brilliantly to our project.

When Dr. Yaa heard about our iGEM project she expressed great interest and there was a clear understanding or acknowledgement of the concepts of iGEM or both. Dr. Yaa spoke very passionately of GMOs and made it clear that GMOs would be an essential solution to malnutrition, which is a recurring motif in Ghana. As a member of the Safety Committee Dr. Yaa had recently contributed to the approval of four GMO projects in Ghana. The four GMO projects includes protein rich sweet potato and cotton with pesticides integrated into the genom (BT-cotton). The projects have got permits to do research but the research will be subject to strict rules concerning biosafety, management of risks in biochemistry and national biosafety. Source: A.A. Adenle et al.: Status of development, regulation and adoption of GM agriculture in Africa: Views and positions of stakeholder groups. Food Policy. 2013:43,159-166. (Link)

Dr. Yaa Spoke of GMO as an important step forward. The positive effects of GMOs relating to farmers as well as the general population of Ghana where among others as following:

Farmers:

• Reduce of chemicals in farming
• Improvement of health
• Saving time for the farmers
• Saving tractor fuel, in relation to Green House Gasses.

General population:

• Nutritional balance
• Prevention of children suffering from malnutrition
• Improvement of health
• Reduction of intolerance, as example lactose intolerance was given, where GMO could be accommodated by producing milk containing lactase, which is an enzyme one lacks when lactose intolerance Source: Swallow, D.M.: Genetics of Lactase Persistence and Lactoseintolerance. Annu.Rev.Genet,2003.37:197-219. (Link)

There is much focus on the fact that child health has improved in Ghana due to the decrease in child mortality rate, Source: Child Mortality Estimates, 2014: Under-five mortality rate (Link) although the nutritional status of children in Ghana still remains a challenge. Source: World Health Organization, 2014: Country Cooperation Strategy at a glance. (Link)

By introducing GMOs this issue could potentially be reduced. However, the ethical aspects of introducing GMOs as relief-aid for hunger or malnutrition or both must be subject to consideration, according to Dr. Yaa. Personally, Dr. Yaa did not think of GMO as ethically incorrect if the purpose was relief of hunger or malnutrition or both. However, it would be necessary to educate any population so they would have a basis of decision regarding the use of GMOs as a nutrition source.

Dr. Yaa mentioned the importance of considering indications for an idea of any genetically modified organism. The hypothetical GMO should have relevance in a way that promises improvement of lifestyle or brings good quality to something or both.

Furthermore, it would be necessary to demonstrate the safety of the GMO. This would include risk assessments such as inspection of the organism when separated from its natural surroundings. It would furthermore be crucial that the commercial releases were informative so that the consumers would receive the essential information.

Professor George Armah from the Noguchi memorial institute for medical research. Professor George Armah (Prof. Armah) was head of the Electron Microscopy & Histopathology department at the Nuguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon. Currently Prof. Armah is the Master of Commonwealth Hall, University of Ghana, Legon.

Prof. Armah has much expert knowledge about the health profile of the Ghanaians as well as the condition of life in Ghana. Therefore, Prof. Armah was an interesting scientist to interview in connection with applications of Edible coli in malnourished countries.

Prof. Armah believed that the Edible coli could have potential in Ghana. The main issue would be to introduce the product as a new source of nutrition. According to Prof. Armah it would be decisive whether the Edible coli could be included in the Ghanaian gastronomy. Prof. Armah proposed that a genetically modified nutrition source in combination with an already existing nutrition source would make the most sense. His argument was that it seemed unlikely to change the way people live. Therefore, GMOs should be incorporated into food such as sweet potato, rice etc.

Prof. Armah spoke of two important aspects of malnutrition in Ghana:

1. The spoilage of food was mentioned an issue in Ghana. Lack of food is not a problem in Ghana compared to the proportion of nutrient. Depending on the geographical location, the people eat differently. In the southern part of Ghana the population primarily eat fish and fufu. Fufu is a staple food made from the cassava plant and this is rich on carbohydrates. The population in the northern part of Ghana have lots of vegetables and chicken, and therefore they do not get the recommended ratio of omega fattyacids.
2. The second issue Prof. Armah spoke of was tradition and cultural practices of Ghana. As mentioned, food available is different according to regions in Ghana. In addition to this, the different regions have different ingredients that they use for their traditional dishes. Furthermore, people act have different priority or tradition of daily diet or both.

Prof. Armah clarified the two aspects by giving examples from the northern part of Ghana. Traditionally children cannot eat eggs, which is a contradiction to the fact that children need good nutrition for proper development and growth. Source: The MAL-ED Network Investigators: The MAL-ED Study: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Approach to Understand the Relationship Between Enteric Pathogens, Malnutrition, Gut Physiology, Physical Growth, Cognitive Development, and Immune Responses in Infants and Children Up to 2 Years of Age in Resource- Poor Environments. Clin Infect Dis,2014:59(4),193-206. (Link)

The reason for this was that children become impertinent if they eat eggs.
Another example from the northern part of Ghana was that most men would rather sell a chicken instead of eating it. Instead, the men would choose to buy alcohol.

Prof. Armah told about the problems considering malnutrition as localized. Cultural and educational practices where mentioned as issues in relation to the application of GMOs. According to Prof. Armah the rural areas of Ghana did not take interest in synthetic biology due to the lack of education.

Objections to the use of synthetic biology did not have anything to do with religion or culture according to Prof. Armah. The culture and tradition in society would have the greatest influence on the population. Thereby GMOs might not be rejected based on a religious or social point of view or both. The resentment against synthetic biology would rather be on the basis on the fact that the population might not embrace a foreign initiative.