Team:SDU-Denmark/Tour46
From 2014.igem.org
Ulrikasimone (Talk | contribs) |
Ulrikasimone (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
<div class="resultGroup"> | <div class="resultGroup"> | ||
- | <p class="resultTitel">We have improved the characterization of the TetR with LVA-tag, BioBrick <a class="dialogLink" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_C0040">BBa_C0040</a>, by making an expression system with GFP and characterizing it by FACS (Fluorescence Acivated Cell Sorting) and SDS-PAGE (SDS Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) analysis. Furthermore we have improved the characterization of <a class="dialogLink" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J45999:Experience">BBa_J45999</a> by incorporating IMS (Iron Mobility Spectroscopy) analysis.</a> | + | <p class="resultTitel">Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device</a> |
+ | <p class="resultText">We have improved the characterization of the TetR with LVA-tag, BioBrick <a class="dialogLink" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_C0040">BBa_C0040</a>, by making an expression system with GFP and characterizing it by FACS (Fluorescence Acivated Cell Sorting) and SDS-PAGE (SDS Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) analysis. Furthermore we have improved the characterization of <a class="dialogLink" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J45999:Experience">BBa_J45999</a> by incorporating IMS (Iron Mobility Spectroscopy) analysis.</a> | ||
</p> | </p> |
Revision as of 03:06, 18 October 2014
Judging criteria
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
6/6 Bronze Requirements
Register the team, have a great summer, and plan to have fun at the Giant Jamboree.
Our team has been registered, we have had the best summer, and we sure plan to have lots of fun at the Giant Jamboree!
Complete Judging form
Our Judging form was completed the 17th of October.
Make a Team Wiki
We sure did, you are currently on it.
Present a poster and a talk at the Giant iGEM Jamboree
We are looking forward and planning to attend the Gigant Jamboree in Boston, where we will present our project with a talk and a poster.
Clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others
In the section; Attributions we describe all the help we have received and in the section; Process we describe how we divided the main responsibilities between us, team members.
Document a new standard BioBrick/Device used in your project and submit it to the Registry
Our BioBricks can be found in the section; Submitted Parts. Our favorite BioBrick is BBa_K1475001, OneProt as basic part.
4/4 Silver Requirements
Experimentally validate a BioBrick/Device of your own design and construction to work as expected
We have validated that our BioBricks BBa_K1475005 and BBa_K1475006 work as expected.
Document the characterization of this part
All our characterization documentation has been uploaded to Registry of Standard Biological Parts and is also available in our section; Results.
Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry
We have successfully submitted these parts
Articulate at least one question encountered by your team beyond the bench, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project
Our major question is whether people will accept genetically modified microorganisms as a food source. To approach this, we have made a questionnaire, ethical considerations, a business plan, interviewed experts, made a wide outreach and an informative and interactive video adventure. For more details, visit our section; Practices and Policy.
3/3 Gold Requirements
Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device
We have improved the characterization of the TetR with LVA-tag, BioBrick BBa_C0040, by making an expression system with GFP and characterizing it by FACS (Fluorescence Acivated Cell Sorting) and SDS-PAGE (SDS Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) analysis. Furthermore we have improved the characterization of BBa_J45999 by incorporating IMS (Iron Mobility Spectroscopy) analysis.
Help another registered iGEM team
We have helped the ETH-Zurich iGEM team and the Imperial College iGEM team. For more details, see here
Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM)
We have described and evaluated our approaches at Practices and Policy.