Team:SDU-Denmark/Tour52

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(54 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<html>
<html>
<h3>Ethics</h3>
<h3>Ethics</h3>
 +
  <img align="right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e6/2014SDUethics1.png" style="width:400px" />
<p>
<p>
-
<span class="intro">Living organisms can be</span> manipulated genetically so they obtain specific characteristics. Such modifications
+
<span class="intro">Living organisms can be manipulated</span> genetically so that they contain specific characteristics. Such modifications
of organisms are obtained by inserting genetic material from other living  
of organisms are obtained by inserting genetic material from other living  
<span class="sourceReference">organisms.</span>
<span class="sourceReference">organisms.</span>
Line 18: Line 19:
   Mehta, M.: Public perceptions of genetically engineered foods: “Playing God” or trusting science Risk. Health, Safety and Environment, 2001. 12,205–220.  
   Mehta, M.: Public perceptions of genetically engineered foods: “Playing God” or trusting science Risk. Health, Safety and Environment, 2001. 12,205–220.  
<a href="http://www.heinonline.org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk:2048/HOL/Page?page=205&handle=hein.journals%2Frisk12&collection=journals#213" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
<a href="http://www.heinonline.org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk:2048/HOL/Page?page=205&handle=hein.journals%2Frisk12&collection=journals#213" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
-
Consequently, many countries have strict regulations or laws against use of GMOs or both. The European Union particularity tend to have strict regulations regarding  
+
Consequently, many countries have strict regulations or laws against use of GMOs. The European Union in particular have strict regulations regarding  
<span class="sourceReference">GMOs.</span>
<span class="sourceReference">GMOs.</span>
<span class="tooltip">
<span class="tooltip">
Line 24: Line 25:
   Davison, J.: GM plants: Science, politics and EC regulations. Plant Science, 2010. 178,94–98.
   Davison, J.: GM plants: Science, politics and EC regulations. Plant Science, 2010. 178,94–98.
<a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0168945209003112/1-s2.0-S0168945209003112-main.pdf?_tid=c48d628e-53ec-11e4-887a-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1413323890_f7d83fc2a2a2e02b4ca3ddd2d29e50f6" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
<a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0168945209003112/1-s2.0-S0168945209003112-main.pdf?_tid=c48d628e-53ec-11e4-887a-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1413323890_f7d83fc2a2a2e02b4ca3ddd2d29e50f6" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
-
<span class="sourceReference"></span>
+
<span class="sourceReference">&nbsp;</span>
<span class="tooltip">
<span class="tooltip">
   <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
   <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
   Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC (Official Journal L 268, 18/10/2003 P. 0024 – 0028)
   Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC (Official Journal L 268, 18/10/2003 P. 0024 – 0028)
<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/animalnutrition/labelling/Reg_1829_2003_en.pdf" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/animalnutrition/labelling/Reg_1829_2003_en.pdf" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
-
<br>
+
</p>
-
 
+
<img align="left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/ba/2014SDUethics2.png" style="width:200px" />
-
In Africa regulations of GMOs are also strict although GMOs have great potential in relation to food and
+
<p>
 +
<span class="intro">In Africa regulations of GMOs</span> are also strict although GMOs have great potential for food and
<span class="sourceReference">crops.</span>
<span class="sourceReference">crops.</span>
<span class="tooltip">
<span class="tooltip">
Line 37: Line 39:
   Paarlberg, R.: GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice. New Biotechnology, 2010.27:5,609–613.
   Paarlberg, R.: GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice. New Biotechnology, 2010.27:5,609–613.
<a href="hhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S1871678410005145/1-s2.0-S1871678410005145-main.pdf?_tid=5c3337be-53f0-11e4-8037-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1413325433_bf176b0d95b0c58bff4107681984f1f8" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
<a href="hhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S1871678410005145/1-s2.0-S1871678410005145-main.pdf?_tid=5c3337be-53f0-11e4-8037-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1413325433_bf176b0d95b0c58bff4107681984f1f8" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
-
The regulations of GMOs in Africa are based on the consumers perception’s, rather than on health and food safety, which
+
The regulations of GMOs in Africa are based on the consumer's perceptions, rather than on health and food safety. This is noteworthy because it could seem unethical that the health and security of people have a lower priority than the consumer's perceptions and it might indicate that populism and industrial interests have a large influence regarding political
-
is  
+
<span class="sourceReference">decisions.</span>
-
<span class="sourceReference">noteworthy.</span>
+
<span class="tooltip">
<span class="tooltip">
   <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
   <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
Line 47: Line 48:
<a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713512005841#bib14" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span><br><br>
<a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713512005841#bib14" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span><br><br>
-
<span class="intro">Manipulation of living organisms</span> gives rise to questions of the public whether the interest of the
+
<span class="intro">Manipulation of living organisms</span> raises questions in the public. One of the central questions which has led to public debate is whether scientists pretend to be God by constructing GMOs.<br>
-
GMO seems profitable or not. One of the central questions, which has given rise to public debate  
+
The agricultural industry has benefited from selective breeding throught centuries, and although this has led to discussions as well, it is a standard procedure which is well-known in the society.<br>
-
is whether scientists pretend to be God by constructing  
+
Whether selective breeding to some extent is equal to the manipulation of living organisms is difficult to determine. One might claim that both methods entails modification of genetic material. However, there is no doubt that genetically engineering is a complex field, which includes careful considerations concerning safety and regulations among
-
<span class="sourceReference">GMOs.</span>
+
<span class="sourceReference">others.</span>
<span class="tooltip">
<span class="tooltip">
   <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
   <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
Line 56: Line 57:
Environment, 2001. 12,205–220.
Environment, 2001. 12,205–220.
<a href="http://www.heinonline.org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk:2048/HOL/Page?page=205&handle=hein.journals%2Frisk12&collection=journals#213" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span><br><br>
<a href="http://www.heinonline.org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk:2048/HOL/Page?page=205&handle=hein.journals%2Frisk12&collection=journals#213" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span><br><br>
 +
</p>
-
<span class="intro">But what role does the scientist play in the debate?</span><br>
+
<h4>What role does the scientist play in the debate?</h4>
-
Studies suggests that individuals with lower levels of scientific knowledge are equivalently skeptical
+
<img align="right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9c/2014SDUethics3.png" style="width:300px" />
 +
<p>
 +
<span class="intro">Studies suggests that</span> individuals with lower levels of scientific knowledge are equivalently sceptical
towards  
towards  
<span class="sourceReference">science.</span>
<span class="sourceReference">science.</span>
Line 66: Line 70:
Int J Public Opin Res, 1994.6:1,35-44.
Int J Public Opin Res, 1994.6:1,35-44.
<a href="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/1/35.abstract" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>  
<a href="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/1/35.abstract" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>  
-
Lack of scientific knowledge indicates a necessity of dissemination of research done by the scientists.  
+
Lack of scientific knowledge indicates a necessity of dissemination of research done by scientists.  
-
Especially research of genetically modified food is dependent on the applications in society. This is  
+
Especially research in genetically modified food is dependent on the applications in society. This is  
-
emphasized by the distinction between the use of GMOs in agriculture compared to the production  
+
emphasized by the distinction between the uses of GMOs in agriculture compared to the production  
-
of pharmaceutics, which has been described by C. Marris in her article about public views on  
+
of pharmaceutical products, which has been described by C. Marris in her article about public views on  
<span class="sourceReference">GMOs.</span>
<span class="sourceReference">GMOs.</span>
<span class="tooltip">
<span class="tooltip">
Line 75: Line 79:
   Marris, C: Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. EMBO reports, 2001.2:7,545-548.
   Marris, C: Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. EMBO reports, 2001.2:7,545-548.
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1083956/" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1083956/" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
-
This means that people are more likely to accept GMOs if they recognize an effect of a product, which is a well-known property of pharmaceutics. It is therefore important to include the public in the laboratory work in hope of preventing the linkage between  
+
This means that people are more likely to accept GMOs if they recognize an effect of a product, which is a well-known property of pharmaceutical products. It is therefore important to include the public in the laboratory work in hope of preventing a link between  
-
synthetic engineering and insecurity. Thereby, it is important that a scientist does not become ignorant to this reality but rather aims at converting science.
+
synthetic engineering and insecurity. Therefore, it is important that a scientist does not become ignorant to this reality but rather aims at converting science.
</p><br>
</p><br>
-
<h4>Would it be an ethical issue to eat genetically modified bacteria?</h4>
+
 
 +
<h4>What is our chances in an already established world?</h4>
 +
<img align="left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/20/2014SDUethics4.png" style="width:250px" />
<p>
<p>
-
<span class="intro">One question in our</span> questionnaire was: <i>Would you eat GMO or food produced by GMOs?</i> Possible answers  
+
<span class="intro">Many people living in</span> Sub-Saharan Africa remain poor and insecure as result of few employment possibilities and low productivity. Given that these populations depend on agricultural products as potato
-
were yes, no, maybe, I don’t think so, and I don’t know. We received a total of 259 answers; 43.66 % yes,  
+
and maize, a solution to the low productivity seems
-
8.11 % no, 33.98 % maybe, 8.11 % I don’t think so and 6.18 % I don’t know.  
+
<span class="sourceReference">essential.</span>
 +
<span class="tooltip">
 +
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
 +
  Paarlberg, R.: GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice. New Biotechnology, 2010.27:5,609–613.
 +
<a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1871678410005145/1-s2.0-S1871678410005145-main.pdf?_tid=5c3337be-53f0-11e4-8037-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1413325433_bf176b0d95b0c58bff4107681984f1f8" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
 +
Furthermore, their poor nutritional status remains low because maize does not cover the recommended diet of a
 +
human
 +
<span class="sourceReference">being.</span>
 +
<span class="tooltip">
 +
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
 +
  FAO/WHO/UNU, expert consultation: Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. World
 +
Health Organization,2007.935,1-265.
 +
<a href="http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/nutrientrequirements/WHO_TRS_935/en/" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
 +
Genetically engineering of living organisms offer infinite possibilities of reducing starvation in the
 +
<span class="sourceReference">world.</span>
 +
<span class="tooltip">
 +
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
 +
  Marshall, S: Genetically Modified Organisms and Food. Nutrition & Food Science, 1994.94:1,4-7.
 +
<a href="http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/00346659410048901" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
 +
Although the developed part of the world has the resources to help populations suffering from undernourishment, malnutrition or both, it is worth acknowledging how the help appears to others.<br>
 +
In relation to the strict GMO regulations in Europe, one might reflect upon the justice of offering GMOs as
 +
food supplement to the developing countries. In addition to this, it is worth considering how the regulations of GMO in developed countries influence governments of developing
 +
<span class="sourceReference">countries.</span>
 +
<span class="tooltip">
 +
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
 +
  Paarlberg, R.: GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice. New Biotechnology, 2010.27:5,609–613.
 +
<a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1871678410005145/1-s2.0-S1871678410005145-main.pdf?_tid=5c3337be-53f0-11e4-8037-
 +
00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1413325433_bf176b0d95b0c58bff4107681984f1f8" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span><br><br>
 +
 
 +
<span class="intro">Due to the above mentioned it might</span> be worth considering improvements to legislations concerning the use of
 +
GMOs in relation to agriculture in European countries. <br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
<h4>How will a controversial proposal be met by an established society?</h4>
 +
<img align="right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/65/2014SDUethics5.png" style="width:250px" />
 +
<p>
 +
<span class="intro">Another consideration approaches </span>the morals of offering GMOs to people who have limited access to food
 +
to begin with.<br><br>
 +
 
 +
<span class="intro">First of all the</span> finances relies on investments from nongovernmental organizations, benefactors or both.
 +
The motive for this comes from the minimal output that is associated with relief aids, which is not beneficial
 +
from the perspectives of the industrial world. Secondly, there is a risk of violating the right of the individual to choose when the alternatives to GMOs are limited. The fact that the people in focus do not have alternatives to begin with could on the contrary support the application of GMOs.<br><br>
 +
 
 +
<span class="intro">Unlike starving populations,</span> the ethical concern of offering GMOs to malnourished societies is not whether it is unfair
 +
to offer this without alternative nutritional choices. In
 +
this context, it is decisive to aim at integrating the GMOs in the gastronomy that already exists, as the two
 +
nutrition experts also states in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/Tour51"> an expert opnion.</a>
 +
But, will the population of developing countries necessarily have a positive view on an initiative such as this
 +
coming from the developed countries?<br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
<h4>Is it an ethical issue to eat genetically modified bacteria?</h4>
 +
<img align="left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/88/2014SDUethics6.png" style="width:400px" />
 +
<p>
 +
<span class="intro">One question in our</span> questionnaire was: <i>Would you eat GMO or food produced by GMOs?</i> The optional answers given were <i>yes, no, maybe, I don’t think so,</i> and <i>I don’t know</i>. We received a total
 +
number of 259 completed questionnaires where the answers were as follow; 43.66 % <i>yes</i>, 8.11 % <i>no</i>,  
 +
33.98 % <i>maybe</i>, 8.11 % <i>I don’t think so</i> and 6.18 % <i>I don’t know</i>. <br>
As mentioned above, GMOs are organisms where the DNA has been modified; some people might even  
As mentioned above, GMOs are organisms where the DNA has been modified; some people might even  
-
say has been tampered with. It is important to notice, that not everyone is familiar with the procedure of  
+
claim that it has been tampered with. It is important to note, that many people are unfamiliar with the  
-
genetically modification, and this perhaps leads to skepticism or the development of fear for the unknown.  
+
procedure of genetical modification. This perhaps leads to skepticism or the development of fear for the  
-
But is it only the ignorance which means that people are hostile to GMOs or what else is the reason why
+
unknown. The distribution of answers to the question <i>Would it be an ethical issue to offer GMO as
-
16.22% of the surveyed maybe or for sure see an ethical issue in eating genetically modified bacteria.
+
relief aid for hunger-stricken countries?</i> showed that 16.22% of all participants answered <i>yes</i> or <i>maybe</i>. But  
-
Maybe it is even the opposite, that people does know a lot about GMOs, and that they are afraid of the risk
+
is it only the ignorance, which means that people are hostile towards GMOs? <br>
-
and hazard, that is enclosed in genetically modification. Maybe those people would change their minds, if  
+
Or could it be the opposite case, namely that people with knowledge of GMOs are afraid of the risks and  
-
they can be guaranteed that the system is safe, for humans and for the environment.  
+
hazards that genetically modification brings? Furthermore, could those people be brought to change their  
-
Furthermore, it might be import to well consider, which genes are going to be used in the development of  
+
minds if they were guaranteed a safe system for humans and the environment?<br><br>
-
GMOs. As synthetic biologist we know that genes are build up by the same four bases, Thymine, Guanine,  
+
</p>
-
Adenine and Cytosine, and we know that the difference between genes is the sequence of these four bases,
+
<img align="right" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f8/2014SDUethics7.png" style="width:400px" />
-
but vegans and vegetarians for example might see an ethical issue in using genes from animals. Would
+
<p>
-
people, who for various reasons don’t eat meat, eat a product produced with genes from an animal? Is the  
+
<span class="intro">Life is full of</span> daily risks, which have to be counterbalanced against each other and against potential benefits. Studies have shown that policies continue to be based on false believes about the public opinion in
-
use of animal genes in GMOs a real ethical issue, or is this a good example of lack of knowledge?
+
<span class="sourceReference">Europe.</span>
-
Another aspect that could be taken into consideration is the fact that medicine produced with the use  
+
<span class="tooltip">
-
of GMOs, is accepted by many people. Do they accept the medicine because they don’t know how it  
+
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
-
is produced, or do they accept it because they can feel and notice an improvement when using these
+
  Marris, C: Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths.EMBO reports, 2001.2:7,545-548.
-
products? Would people though also accept Edible coli as a food source once they even can feel the many
+
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1083956/" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
-
advantages that Edible coli leads to?
+
A well-known term that describes this tendency is “zero risk”, which indicates prospects without risks.
 +
Demands of “zero risk” are not realistic and although these opinions does not necessarily belong to the
 +
general population, it has become increasingly important to communicate the risks to the public about
 +
<span class="sourceReference">risks.</span>
 +
<span class="tooltip">
 +
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
 +
  Bartsch, D: GMO regulatory challenges and science: a European perspective. Journal of
 +
Consumer Protection and Food Safety,2014. 9:1,51–S58.
 +
<a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-014-0885-9" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
 +
So saying, the regulations of GMO primarily should focus on preventing danger to people and
 +
to the environment rather than accommodating zero
 +
<span class="sourceReference">tolerance.</span>
 +
<span class="tooltip">
 +
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
 +
  Peters, HP., et al. Culture and
 +
Technological Innovation: Impact of Institutional Trust and Appreciation of Nature on Attitudes
 +
towards Food Biotechnology in the USA and Germany. Int J Public Opin Res,2007.19:2,191-220.
 +
<a href="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/2/191.full" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span><br><br>
 +
 
 +
<span class="intro">Furthermore, it might be</span> important to consider which genes to use in the development of GMOs. As synthetic biologists we know that genes consists of four bases, Thymine, Guanine, Adenine and Cytosine, and we know that the difference between genes lies in the sequence of these four bases alone. Nevertheless specific
 +
genes, like genes from animals, might be unethical to use in GMO’s as it would be disrespectful towards
 +
vegans, vegetarians, religious groups etc. <br>
 +
 
 +
Would people, who for various reasons does not eat meat, accept to eat a product containing genes from  
 +
an animal? Is the use of animal genes in GMOs a real ethical issue, or is this exclusively an example of lack  
 +
of knowledge? These questions are important for the continued research.<br><br>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<span class="intro"><i>Would the use of</i></span> <i>GMOs in the agricultural industries have an impact on the job market or cultural traditions?</i><br>
 +
As mentioned above, genetically modified organisms can bring pivotal advantages to the agriculture
 +
and food industry. The production may expand with larger quantities and more uniform breeding,
 +
which has worked as an encouragement of approving GMOs in the agricultural
 +
<span class="sourceReference">industry.</span>
 +
<span class="tooltip">
 +
  <span class="tooltipHeader">Source:</span>
 +
  Select USA: The Biotechnology Industry in the United States.
 +
<a href="http://selectusa.commerce.gov/industry-snapshots/biotechnology-industry-united-states" target="_blank">(Link)</a></span>
 +
But what would happen if GMOs were approved for all
 +
industries? Would it result in the optimal exploitation of our resources and would it lead to the best and
 +
largest quantities of the food production? Maybe it would. But maybe it would also lead to loss of jobs, as
 +
the breeding is easier and more successful. Furthermore smaller companies and private farmers might be
 +
forced to produce larger quantities and better products, as they otherwise could not keep up with the rapid
 +
growth and development of the food producing industry.<br><br>
 +
<span class="intro">In other respects, the permission of</span> GMOs in agricultural industry might lead to the creation of more new jobs, for example within the research industry. GMOs also require environmental safeguards that must be
 +
performed by educated experts. In that way, it could encourage to higher educational levels in some
 +
countries, and thereby high probability of getting a job afterwards.<br><br>
 +
 
 +
<span class="intro">It has been valuable for our iGEM team</span> to work on constructing an edible coli where so many ethical considerations come into play. To begin with the idea of creating a nutrition source based on non-digestible materials for human beings seemed as the good deed of the day, but it did not take long before this viewpoint changed due to reflections.<br>
 +
It came to our attention that scientists play a major role in the dissemination of new scientific proposals. The reason for this is the importance of a good integration of the proposal, but also because of the impact it can have on peoples lives.<br>
 +
On our ethics course in Copenhagen and through the trip to Ghana, we began to reflect upon how our targeted consumers would welcome our proposal. Whether they would see it as much-needed help or as a deamination of their needs and we realized that maybe not all people would welcome the idea with open arms.<br>
 +
Our ethical considerations have made us look at our project from several new angles and opened our eyes to both the good and the more problematic aspects of our project.
 +
<br><br><br>
</p>
</p>
</html>
</html>
{{:Team:SDU-Denmark/core/footer}}
{{:Team:SDU-Denmark/core/footer}}

Latest revision as of 03:58, 18 October 2014

Ethics

Living organisms can be manipulated genetically so that they contain specific characteristics. Such modifications of organisms are obtained by inserting genetic material from other living organisms. Source: Marshall, S: Genetically Modified Organisms and Food. Nutrition & Food Science, 1994.94:1,4-7. (Link) A genetically modified organism (GMO) is associated with uncertainty by many. Source: Mehta, M.: Public perceptions of genetically engineered foods: “Playing God” or trusting science Risk. Health, Safety and Environment, 2001. 12,205–220. (Link) Consequently, many countries have strict regulations or laws against use of GMOs. The European Union in particular have strict regulations regarding GMOs. Source: Davison, J.: GM plants: Science, politics and EC regulations. Plant Science, 2010. 178,94–98. (Link)   Source: Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC (Official Journal L 268, 18/10/2003 P. 0024 – 0028) (Link)

In Africa regulations of GMOs are also strict although GMOs have great potential for food and crops. Source: Paarlberg, R.: GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice. New Biotechnology, 2010.27:5,609–613. (Link) The regulations of GMOs in Africa are based on the consumer's perceptions, rather than on health and food safety. This is noteworthy because it could seem unethical that the health and security of people have a lower priority than the consumer's perceptions and it might indicate that populism and industrial interests have a large influence regarding political decisions. Source: Viljoen, C.D and Marx, G.M.: The implications for mandatory GM labelling under the Consumer Protection Act in South Africa. Food Control, 2013.31:2,387–391. (Link)

Manipulation of living organisms raises questions in the public. One of the central questions which has led to public debate is whether scientists pretend to be God by constructing GMOs.
The agricultural industry has benefited from selective breeding throught centuries, and although this has led to discussions as well, it is a standard procedure which is well-known in the society.
Whether selective breeding to some extent is equal to the manipulation of living organisms is difficult to determine. One might claim that both methods entails modification of genetic material. However, there is no doubt that genetically engineering is a complex field, which includes careful considerations concerning safety and regulations among others. Source: Mehta, M.: Public perceptions of genetically engineered foods: “Playing God” or trusting science Risk. Health, Safety and Environment, 2001. 12,205–220. (Link)

What role does the scientist play in the debate?

Studies suggests that individuals with lower levels of scientific knowledge are equivalently sceptical towards science. Source: Einsiedel, E.F.: Mental Maps of Science: Knowledge and attitude Among Canadian Adults. Int J Public Opin Res, 1994.6:1,35-44. (Link) Lack of scientific knowledge indicates a necessity of dissemination of research done by scientists. Especially research in genetically modified food is dependent on the applications in society. This is emphasized by the distinction between the uses of GMOs in agriculture compared to the production of pharmaceutical products, which has been described by C. Marris in her article about public views on GMOs. Source: Marris, C: Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. EMBO reports, 2001.2:7,545-548. (Link) This means that people are more likely to accept GMOs if they recognize an effect of a product, which is a well-known property of pharmaceutical products. It is therefore important to include the public in the laboratory work in hope of preventing a link between synthetic engineering and insecurity. Therefore, it is important that a scientist does not become ignorant to this reality but rather aims at converting science.


What is our chances in an already established world?

Many people living in Sub-Saharan Africa remain poor and insecure as result of few employment possibilities and low productivity. Given that these populations depend on agricultural products as potato and maize, a solution to the low productivity seems essential. Source: Paarlberg, R.: GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice. New Biotechnology, 2010.27:5,609–613. (Link) Furthermore, their poor nutritional status remains low because maize does not cover the recommended diet of a human being. Source: FAO/WHO/UNU, expert consultation: Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. World Health Organization,2007.935,1-265. (Link) Genetically engineering of living organisms offer infinite possibilities of reducing starvation in the world. Source: Marshall, S: Genetically Modified Organisms and Food. Nutrition & Food Science, 1994.94:1,4-7. (Link) Although the developed part of the world has the resources to help populations suffering from undernourishment, malnutrition or both, it is worth acknowledging how the help appears to others.
In relation to the strict GMO regulations in Europe, one might reflect upon the justice of offering GMOs as food supplement to the developing countries. In addition to this, it is worth considering how the regulations of GMO in developed countries influence governments of developing countries. Source: Paarlberg, R.: GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice. New Biotechnology, 2010.27:5,609–613. (Link)

Due to the above mentioned it might be worth considering improvements to legislations concerning the use of GMOs in relation to agriculture in European countries.

How will a controversial proposal be met by an established society?

Another consideration approaches the morals of offering GMOs to people who have limited access to food to begin with.

First of all the finances relies on investments from nongovernmental organizations, benefactors or both. The motive for this comes from the minimal output that is associated with relief aids, which is not beneficial from the perspectives of the industrial world. Secondly, there is a risk of violating the right of the individual to choose when the alternatives to GMOs are limited. The fact that the people in focus do not have alternatives to begin with could on the contrary support the application of GMOs.

Unlike starving populations, the ethical concern of offering GMOs to malnourished societies is not whether it is unfair to offer this without alternative nutritional choices. In this context, it is decisive to aim at integrating the GMOs in the gastronomy that already exists, as the two nutrition experts also states in an expert opnion. But, will the population of developing countries necessarily have a positive view on an initiative such as this coming from the developed countries?

Is it an ethical issue to eat genetically modified bacteria?

One question in our questionnaire was: Would you eat GMO or food produced by GMOs? The optional answers given were yes, no, maybe, I don’t think so, and I don’t know. We received a total number of 259 completed questionnaires where the answers were as follow; 43.66 % yes, 8.11 % no, 33.98 % maybe, 8.11 % I don’t think so and 6.18 % I don’t know.
As mentioned above, GMOs are organisms where the DNA has been modified; some people might even claim that it has been tampered with. It is important to note, that many people are unfamiliar with the procedure of genetical modification. This perhaps leads to skepticism or the development of fear for the unknown. The distribution of answers to the question Would it be an ethical issue to offer GMO as relief aid for hunger-stricken countries? showed that 16.22% of all participants answered yes or maybe. But is it only the ignorance, which means that people are hostile towards GMOs?
Or could it be the opposite case, namely that people with knowledge of GMOs are afraid of the risks and hazards that genetically modification brings? Furthermore, could those people be brought to change their minds if they were guaranteed a safe system for humans and the environment?

Life is full of daily risks, which have to be counterbalanced against each other and against potential benefits. Studies have shown that policies continue to be based on false believes about the public opinion in Europe. Source: Marris, C: Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths.EMBO reports, 2001.2:7,545-548. (Link) A well-known term that describes this tendency is “zero risk”, which indicates prospects without risks. Demands of “zero risk” are not realistic and although these opinions does not necessarily belong to the general population, it has become increasingly important to communicate the risks to the public about risks. Source: Bartsch, D: GMO regulatory challenges and science: a European perspective. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety,2014. 9:1,51–S58. (Link) So saying, the regulations of GMO primarily should focus on preventing danger to people and to the environment rather than accommodating zero tolerance. Source: Peters, HP., et al. Culture and Technological Innovation: Impact of Institutional Trust and Appreciation of Nature on Attitudes towards Food Biotechnology in the USA and Germany. Int J Public Opin Res,2007.19:2,191-220. (Link)

Furthermore, it might be important to consider which genes to use in the development of GMOs. As synthetic biologists we know that genes consists of four bases, Thymine, Guanine, Adenine and Cytosine, and we know that the difference between genes lies in the sequence of these four bases alone. Nevertheless specific genes, like genes from animals, might be unethical to use in GMO’s as it would be disrespectful towards vegans, vegetarians, religious groups etc.
Would people, who for various reasons does not eat meat, accept to eat a product containing genes from an animal? Is the use of animal genes in GMOs a real ethical issue, or is this exclusively an example of lack of knowledge? These questions are important for the continued research.

Would the use of GMOs in the agricultural industries have an impact on the job market or cultural traditions?
As mentioned above, genetically modified organisms can bring pivotal advantages to the agriculture and food industry. The production may expand with larger quantities and more uniform breeding, which has worked as an encouragement of approving GMOs in the agricultural industry. Source: Select USA: The Biotechnology Industry in the United States. (Link) But what would happen if GMOs were approved for all industries? Would it result in the optimal exploitation of our resources and would it lead to the best and largest quantities of the food production? Maybe it would. But maybe it would also lead to loss of jobs, as the breeding is easier and more successful. Furthermore smaller companies and private farmers might be forced to produce larger quantities and better products, as they otherwise could not keep up with the rapid growth and development of the food producing industry.

In other respects, the permission of GMOs in agricultural industry might lead to the creation of more new jobs, for example within the research industry. GMOs also require environmental safeguards that must be performed by educated experts. In that way, it could encourage to higher educational levels in some countries, and thereby high probability of getting a job afterwards.

It has been valuable for our iGEM team to work on constructing an edible coli where so many ethical considerations come into play. To begin with the idea of creating a nutrition source based on non-digestible materials for human beings seemed as the good deed of the day, but it did not take long before this viewpoint changed due to reflections.
It came to our attention that scientists play a major role in the dissemination of new scientific proposals. The reason for this is the importance of a good integration of the proposal, but also because of the impact it can have on peoples lives.
On our ethics course in Copenhagen and through the trip to Ghana, we began to reflect upon how our targeted consumers would welcome our proposal. Whether they would see it as much-needed help or as a deamination of their needs and we realized that maybe not all people would welcome the idea with open arms.
Our ethical considerations have made us look at our project from several new angles and opened our eyes to both the good and the more problematic aspects of our project.