Does our kit worth to use instead the current methods? Is it cheaper or only atractive but less feasible? Aimed to respond these questions we analyze the current situation about prices of most used methods to detect Vibrio sp. in industry and labs.

There are a lot of selective and differential kind of agars for Vibrio sp.. You always have to begin with TCBS agar, in which you culture a pre-enriched sample in peptone water. In this point you alreadsy got to spend 48 h of your time plus USD 28 (for 40 TCBS dishes) and USD 138 (for 500 g of bufferd peptone water).

If you get suspect colonies, you got to identify the specie, reason by which you got to spend your money (and several days) performing biochemical tests or using other agars (as Vibrio Agar, V. vulnificus Agar, V. parahemolyticus Agar). Or if you prefer molecular technologies, you can spend less time (but more money) using a PCR. Other methods suchs as immunological reactions or toxins purifications are only used in research because their hihg price. With these agars you will have spent at least USD 400) for other 40 Petri dishes each.

In conclussion, to detect Vibrio sp. in a food or water sample is necessary to be able to spend one week and USD 570. The price for each reaction is USD 28.5 (keeping on mind that even if you don't use all the available agars, you have to acquire them if you want to be able to find what the specie of your Vibrio sp. is).

So, how much will be our kit? We don't know!... But we can do an approximation: Delvotest is an easy-use kit to detect antibiotics in milk, it usses thermophilic bacilli as indicators. Each reaction of delvotest costs USD 1.5 and you can buy them for 25 or 100 units. Now, think that our kit will be made of a easier-culturable bacteria (E. coli!) and needs no indicator as Delvotest does (the color will be produced by E. coli itself, due to mRFP or AmilCP genes). Taking the above into account, we can hypotezyse that our kit could be cheaper than Delvotest, it means around USD 1 (28 times cheaper than current methodologies).

But things are not always so easy... we are using pqrr4 promoter (which is very conserved among Vibrio sp.) and a phosphorilation cascade from Vibrio cholerae., but this bacterium is not the only one that usses CAI-1 autoinducer, so what will happen if our kit is sensible to Vibrio sp. rather than specific for Vibrio cholerae.?? See the next section! ;)

Texto

Más texto??

We learnt, because of our interview with Dr. Suárez, that every single scientific project carries ethical issues which have to be taken into account by the researchres ad by all involved people. Off course, our project is not an exception, so we had to analyze these issues.

Fortunately we can say that our project does not involve serious ethical issues, this because of the following reasons:

• We did not work directly with V. cholerae or with any other pathogen. All the organisms involved in our project were bacteria (no mammal cells).

• Our final product (an easy-use kit) is meant to be used in laboratories, industries and universities; that means, it will be used by trained people. Our product will be easy-disposable and wont got to have directly contact to foods id order to get a result.

For the above reasons, our project does not have ethical issues more than the coomon necessary issues in all sythetic biology's project. These issues are well known and well discussed in scientific (icluding philosophical) literature. Most of those are related with genetic manipulations.

On References we show you a brief, but excellent, compendium of revised cietific literature about this topic. These papers also discuss the issues mentioned above.

Texto