Team:SCUT/Safety

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 55: Line 55:
</b>
</b>
<br/>A. Who made the world? The god, or we human beings ?<br/>
<br/>A. Who made the world? The god, or we human beings ?<br/>
-
     &nbsp;---- Introduction to Bioethics<br/>
+
     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;---- Introduction to Bioethics<br/>
     B. Heads up! The CDC is watching u.<br/>
     B. Heads up! The CDC is watching u.<br/>
-
     &nbsp;---- Regulations of Biosafety in Research Laboratories<br/>
+
     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;---- Regulations of Biosafety in Research Laboratories<br/>
     C. How to Protect yourself and human beings.<br/>
     C. How to Protect yourself and human beings.<br/>
-
     &nbsp;---- More Details about Biosafety
+
     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;---- More Details about Biosafety
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>
<b>2) Risks to the safety and health of team members, or other people working in the lab:</b>
<b>2) Risks to the safety and health of team members, or other people working in the lab:</b>

Revision as of 10:30, 15 October 2014

Q & A

1) Please briefly describe of the topics that you learned about in your safety training:
A. Who made the world? The god, or we human beings ?
    ---- Introduction to Bioethics
B. Heads up! The CDC is watching u.
    ---- Regulations of Biosafety in Research Laboratories
C. How to Protect yourself and human beings.
    ---- More Details about Biosafety

2) Risks to the safety and health of team members, or other people working in the lab:
Ethidium bromide, Gelred and some genetic engineering relative reagents have risks to members` health. Thus, we attached great importance to the protection when doing experiments.

3) Risks to the environment (from waste disposal, or from materials escaping from your lab):As mentioned above, biological materials are dealt with denature process and harmless to the environment. Moreover, strict lab rules are executed to further ensure safety.

4) Risks to security through malicious mis-use by individuals, groups, or countries:
We all received safety training. Plus, when we were faced with problems we usually turned to skilled ones for help. We believe everything`s under control when doing experiments and it turns out that we haven`t met any problems of biosafety yet.

5) What measures are you taking to reduce these risks?
For our perspective, it is, of course, very significant for iGEM teams to pay attention to safety in our involvement, considering the genetically machines we constructed are artificial and, most genetically engineered microorganisms are resistant to specific drugs. Thus, we`d like to support this safety program and will be willing to involve it again into our future projects.

6)What new risks might arise from your project's growth? Also, what risks might arise if the knowledge you generate or the methods you develop became widely available?
Given that we old members are becoming more and more skillful and, we are to design a suicide mechanism for further application, the risks in the future could only happen in new guys when they get started to do experiments. Therefore, we will spare no efforts to train the freshmen to avoid the risks. It is to say, according to the current knowledge we got, we deem it riskless to apply our project to a commercial or industrial products.

7) Does your project currently include any design features to reduce risks? Or, if you did all the future work to make your project grow into a popular product, would you plan to design any new features to minimize risks? Such features are not required for an iGEM project, but many teams choose to explore them.
The hosts we use are safe. The yeast is an auxotrophic strain, while Top 10 E.coli is a general strain in lab which has been tamed for genetic engineering. And, we will focus on inserting a suicide mechanism on the recombinant molecules for more security. It is to say that we have full confidence that our project is extremely unlikely to get problems of biosafety with it proceeding.

Other Work