Team:KIT-Kyoto/Modeling
From 2014.igem.org
Lovetaylor (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(33 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{Team:KIT-Kyoto/close_navi}} | {{Team:KIT-Kyoto/close_navi}} | ||
{{Team:KIT-Kyoto/Scroll}} | {{Team:KIT-Kyoto/Scroll}} | ||
- | {{Team:KIT-Kyoto/ | + | {{Team:KIT-Kyoto/table}} |
{{Team:KIT-Kyoto/logo}} | {{Team:KIT-Kyoto/logo}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<p class="sentence"> | <p class="sentence"> | ||
Two monoterpene synthetic systems were designed by combining two monoterpene synthetic enzyme genes which are already on the parts’ list, and γ-terpinene synthetic enzyme gene we submitted as well as two protein devices. <br> | Two monoterpene synthetic systems were designed by combining two monoterpene synthetic enzyme genes which are already on the parts’ list, and γ-terpinene synthetic enzyme gene we submitted as well as two protein devices. <br> | ||
- | One device is <em>E.coli</em> IPTG-inducing γ-terpinene synthetic pathway, and the other is yeast-based γ-terpinene synthetic pathway. | + | One device is <em>E. coli</em> IPTG-inducing γ-terpinene synthetic pathway, and the other is yeast-based γ-terpinene synthetic pathway. |
<br> | <br> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
<div class="PDbox"> | <div class="PDbox"> | ||
<div class="PDs1"> | <div class="PDs1"> | ||
- | <h3>Expression in | + | <h3>Expression in <em>S. cerevisiae</em></h3> |
<p class="sentence"> | <p class="sentence"> | ||
- | The device in this yeast-based monoterpene synthetic pathway uses the S. cerevisiae cells which constantly express monoterpene synthetic enzyme by introducing each gene of monoterpene synthetic enzymes at the downstream of TEF promoter. GPP is constitutively synthesized in yeast cells and its volume is enough for intracellular monoterpene synthesis. Thus a certain monoterpene is easily synthesized by transferring this device into yeast cells. | + | The device in this yeast-based monoterpene synthetic pathway uses the <em>S. cerevisiae</em> cells which constantly express monoterpene synthetic enzyme by introducing each gene of monoterpene synthetic enzymes at the downstream of <em>TEF</em> promoter. GPP is constitutively synthesized in yeast cells and its volume is enough for intracellular monoterpene synthesis. Thus a certain monoterpene is easily synthesized by transferring this device into yeast cells. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<div class="PDbox"> | <div class="PDbox"> | ||
<div class="PDs2"> | <div class="PDs2"> | ||
- | <h3>Expression in <em>E.coli</em></h3> | + | <h3>Expression in <em>E. coli</em></h3> |
<p class="sentence"> | <p class="sentence"> | ||
- | The device expresses only when BL21(DE3) strain is used | + | The device expresses only when BL21(DE3) strain is used as the host. In this device, each monoperpene synthetic gene is under the control of <em>tac</em> promoter, so the expression of each monoterpene synthase gene is induced by adding IPTG. By changing the dose of IPTG and the timing of addition, the monoterpene volume changes and the intensity of scent also changes. |
- | <br>However, <em>E.coli</em> does not have enzyme to synthesize geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP), a basal material for all monoterpene synthesis. So one has to directly add GPP to the medium or transfer the DMAPP transferase gene (ERG20). | + | <br>However, <em>E. coli</em> does not have enzyme to synthesize geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP), a basal material for all monoterpene synthesis. So one has to directly add GPP to the medium or transfer the DMAPP transferase gene (ERG20). |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<div class="PDbox"> | <div class="PDbox"> | ||
+ | <h3>How the Pathways Function</h3> <!--はてなマークつけないのが正しい--> | ||
<p class="sentence"> | <p class="sentence"> | ||
- | + | In the two pathways we designed, the behaviors of insects on the plate can be controlled via the scents that can be regulated by the types of monoterpene synthases, the volume and the timing of IPTG addition and the location of colonies on the plate. In our pathways, yeast and <em>E. coli</em> cells become a conductor to orchestrate insects. | |
- | + | ||
- | In the two pathways we designed, the behaviors of insects on the plate can be controlled via the scents that can be regulated by the types of monoterpene synthases, the volume and the timing of IPTG addition and the location of colonies on the plate. In our pathways, yeast and <em>E.coli</em> cells become a conductor to orchestrate insects. | + | |
<br> | <br> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 88: | Line 87: | ||
<h2 id="bioassay">Biological Assay</h2> | <h2 id="bioassay">Biological Assay</h2> | ||
<div class="scroll"></div> | <div class="scroll"></div> | ||
+ | <h3>Purpose</h3> | ||
<p class="sentence"> | <p class="sentence"> | ||
+ | To evaluate the effect of limonene on the behavior of <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em>. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <h3>Materials</h3> | ||
+ | <p class="sentence"> | ||
+ | The first-third instar larvae of <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em> Canton S (CS) as a wild type strain. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="PDbox"> | ||
+ | <div class="PDs1"> | ||
+ | <h3>Method</h3> | ||
+ | <p class="sentence"> | ||
+ | 200 larvae were placed at the center of an agar plate (2.0%, radius: 8cm). A piece of filter paper was placed on each end of the plate (Figure 1). 2.5µl of limonene was dropped on one side of the filter paper (Limonene) and cover the plate with a lid. Three minutes later, the number of larvae within a 3cm radius from the filter paper was counted (A or B). The concentrations of limonene are diluted by 20% and 10% with DMSO. The control is DMSO. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p class="sentence"> | ||
+ | The behavioral effects of incentives were measured by Response Index (RI). The RI is defined as (Ns-Nc)/(Ns+Nc), where Ns is the number of population attracted to limonene, and Nc is the number of population which moved to the control. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p class="sentence"> | ||
+ | When all the population move into the radius with limonene, RI is 1 and when all the population move into the radius of control, RI is -1. Positive values mean positive chemotactic effect, and negative values mean negative chemotactic effect.<br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="pdimg2"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/67/Kit_Bioassay.png" alt='bioassay' /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="clear"><hr /></div> | ||
+ | <h3>Result</h3> | ||
+ | <p class="sentence"> | ||
+ | <div class="bioassay"> | ||
+ | <strong>Table 1. With Limonene 100%</strong> | ||
+ | <div class="m_table"> | ||
+ | <table class="materials"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Trial</th> | ||
+ | <th>A<br>(Limonene)</th> | ||
+ | <th>B<br>(Control)</th> | ||
+ | <th>RI</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>1st</td> | ||
+ | <td>139</td> | ||
+ | <td>11</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.853</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>2nd</td> | ||
+ | <td>116</td> | ||
+ | <td>52</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.381</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>3rd</td> | ||
+ | <td>130</td> | ||
+ | <td>11</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.844</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Average</td> | ||
+ | <td>128</td> | ||
+ | <td>25</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.678</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <img src="/wiki/images/3/3b/Kit_Bioassay_fig2.png"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | <div class="bioassay"> | ||
+ | <strong>Table 2. With Limonene 20%</strong> | ||
+ | <div class="m_table"> | ||
+ | <table class="materials"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Trial</th> | ||
+ | <th>A<br>(Limonene)</th> | ||
+ | <th>B<br>(Control)</th> | ||
+ | <th>RI</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>1st</td> | ||
+ | <td>115</td> | ||
+ | <td>59</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.322</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>2nd</td> | ||
+ | <td>96</td> | ||
+ | <td>71</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.149</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>3rd</td> | ||
+ | <td>133</td> | ||
+ | <td>42</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.520</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Average</td> | ||
+ | <td>115</td> | ||
+ | <td>57</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.333</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <img src="/wiki/images/7/79/Kit_Bioassay_fig3.png"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | <div class="bioassay"> | ||
+ | <strong>Table 3. With Limonene 10%</strong> | ||
+ | <div class="m_table"> | ||
+ | <table class="materials"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Trial</th> | ||
+ | <th>A<br>(Limonene)</th> | ||
+ | <th>B<br>(Control)</th> | ||
+ | <th>RI</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>1st</td> | ||
+ | <td>89</td> | ||
+ | <td>72</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.106</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>2nd</td> | ||
+ | <td>98</td> | ||
+ | <td>59</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.248</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>3rd</td> | ||
+ | <td>92</td> | ||
+ | <td>78</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.082</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Average</td> | ||
+ | <td>93</td> | ||
+ | <td>70</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.143</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <img src="/wiki/images/1/13/Kit_Bioassay_fig4.png"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | < | + | </p> |
- | < | + | <h3>Discussion</h3> |
- | < | + | <p class="sentence"> |
- | < | + | Because RI was over 0 in all the trials, it was revealed that limonene attracts <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em>. Furthermore, it was suggested that the effects of incentives were increased relative to the concentration of limonene.<br> |
- | < | + | </p> |
- | < | + | <h3>Reference</h3> |
- | <br> | + | <p class="sentence"> |
- | < | + | Shimoyama, N. (2014). TJB 200000764. <br>[online] Biol.tsukuba.ac.jp. Available at:<br> <a href="http://www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/tjb/Vol3No2/TJB200402200000764.html">http://www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/tjb/Vol3No2/TJB200402200000764.html</a> [Accessed 25 Aug. 2014]. |
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | |
- | <br> | + | |
- | <br> | + | |
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<div class="clear"><hr /></div> | <div class="clear"><hr /></div> | ||
Line 160: | Line 285: | ||
pd_s = pd_w/3*2; | pd_s = pd_w/3*2; | ||
$(".pdimg1 img").css({width:pd_w}); | $(".pdimg1 img").css({width:pd_w}); | ||
- | $(".pdimg2 img,.pdimg3 img").css({width:pd_w1}); | + | $(".pdimg2 img,.pdimg3 img,.bioassay img").css({width:pd_w1}); |
$(".PDs1,.PDs2").css({width:pd_s}); | $(".PDs1,.PDs2").css({width:pd_s}); | ||
} | } | ||
Line 166: | Line 291: | ||
var m_pdfix =function(){ | var m_pdfix =function(){ | ||
var mpd_w = $(".main-contents").width(); | var mpd_w = $(".main-contents").width(); | ||
- | $(".pdimg1 img,.pdimg2 img,.pdimg3 img").css({width:mpd_w}); | + | $(".pdimg1 img,.pdimg2 img,.pdimg3 img,.bioassay img").css({width:mpd_w}); |
} | } | ||
$(function(){ | $(function(){ | ||
Line 185: | Line 310: | ||
<style type="text/css"> | <style type="text/css"> | ||
+ | h3 em{ | ||
+ | font-size:20px; | ||
+ | } | ||
.PDbox{ | .PDbox{ | ||
overflow:hidden; | overflow:hidden; | ||
Line 204: | Line 332: | ||
float:right; | float:right; | ||
} | } | ||
- | + | .bioassay{ | |
+ | overflow:hidden; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | .bioassay img,.bioassay table{ | ||
+ | float:left; | ||
+ | margin-left:20px; | ||
+ | } | ||
@media screen and (max-width: 568px) { | @media screen and (max-width: 568px) { | ||
Line 213: | Line 347: | ||
.PDs1,.PDs2,.pdimg2,.pdimg3{ | .PDs1,.PDs2,.pdimg2,.pdimg3{ | ||
float:none; | float:none; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | .bioassay img,.bioassay table{ | ||
+ | float:none; | ||
+ | margin-left:0px; | ||
} | } | ||
} | } |
Latest revision as of 20:56, 17 October 2014
Modeling
Parts & Device
Project Concept
Two monoterpene synthetic systems were designed by combining two monoterpene synthetic enzyme genes which are already on the parts’ list, and γ-terpinene synthetic enzyme gene we submitted as well as two protein devices.
One device is E. coli IPTG-inducing γ-terpinene synthetic pathway, and the other is yeast-based γ-terpinene synthetic pathway.
Expression in S. cerevisiae
The device in this yeast-based monoterpene synthetic pathway uses the S. cerevisiae cells which constantly express monoterpene synthetic enzyme by introducing each gene of monoterpene synthetic enzymes at the downstream of TEF promoter. GPP is constitutively synthesized in yeast cells and its volume is enough for intracellular monoterpene synthesis. Thus a certain monoterpene is easily synthesized by transferring this device into yeast cells.
Expression in E. coli
The device expresses only when BL21(DE3) strain is used as the host. In this device, each monoperpene synthetic gene is under the control of tac promoter, so the expression of each monoterpene synthase gene is induced by adding IPTG. By changing the dose of IPTG and the timing of addition, the monoterpene volume changes and the intensity of scent also changes.
However, E. coli does not have enzyme to synthesize geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP), a basal material for all monoterpene synthesis. So one has to directly add GPP to the medium or transfer the DMAPP transferase gene (ERG20).
How the Pathways Function
In the two pathways we designed, the behaviors of insects on the plate can be controlled via the scents that can be regulated by the types of monoterpene synthases, the volume and the timing of IPTG addition and the location of colonies on the plate. In our pathways, yeast and E. coli cells become a conductor to orchestrate insects.
Biological Assay
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of limonene on the behavior of Drosophila melanogaster.
Materials
The first-third instar larvae of Drosophila melanogaster Canton S (CS) as a wild type strain.
Method
200 larvae were placed at the center of an agar plate (2.0%, radius: 8cm). A piece of filter paper was placed on each end of the plate (Figure 1). 2.5µl of limonene was dropped on one side of the filter paper (Limonene) and cover the plate with a lid. Three minutes later, the number of larvae within a 3cm radius from the filter paper was counted (A or B). The concentrations of limonene are diluted by 20% and 10% with DMSO. The control is DMSO.
The behavioral effects of incentives were measured by Response Index (RI). The RI is defined as (Ns-Nc)/(Ns+Nc), where Ns is the number of population attracted to limonene, and Nc is the number of population which moved to the control.
When all the population move into the radius with limonene, RI is 1 and when all the population move into the radius of control, RI is -1. Positive values mean positive chemotactic effect, and negative values mean negative chemotactic effect.
Result
Trial | A (Limonene) |
B (Control) |
RI |
---|---|---|---|
1st | 139 | 11 | 0.853 |
2nd | 116 | 52 | 0.381 |
3rd | 130 | 11 | 0.844 |
Average | 128 | 25 | 0.678 |
Trial | A (Limonene) |
B (Control) |
RI |
---|---|---|---|
1st | 115 | 59 | 0.322 |
2nd | 96 | 71 | 0.149 |
3rd | 133 | 42 | 0.520 |
Average | 115 | 57 | 0.333 |
Trial | A (Limonene) |
B (Control) |
RI |
---|---|---|---|
1st | 89 | 72 | 0.106 |
2nd | 98 | 59 | 0.248 |
3rd | 92 | 78 | 0.082 |
Average | 93 | 70 | 0.143 |
Discussion
Because RI was over 0 in all the trials, it was revealed that limonene attracts Drosophila melanogaster. Furthermore, it was suggested that the effects of incentives were increased relative to the concentration of limonene.
Reference
Shimoyama, N. (2014). TJB 200000764.
[online] Biol.tsukuba.ac.jp. Available at:
http://www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/tjb/Vol3No2/TJB200402200000764.html [Accessed 25 Aug. 2014].