"
Team-EPF Lausanne/Judging
From 2014.igem.org
JUDGNG
Judging form
The judging form can be found here.
Medal criteria
| Criterion | Achieved? | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Team registration | EPF_Lausanne | |
| Complete judging form | Judging form | |
| Team Wiki | Wiki | |
| Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree | ||
| The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services. | Attributions | |
| Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry. | BBa_K1486001 | |
| Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected. | BBa_K1486008 | |
| Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry. | BBa_K1486008 | |
| Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry | BBa_K1486002 | |
| iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted. | Safety Page | |
| Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry. | BBa_K1486045 | |
| Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. | ||
| iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). | Safety Page |
Microfluidics medal criteria
| Criterion | Achieved? | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Team registration | EPF_Lausanne | |
| Complete judging form | Judging form | |
| Team Wiki | Wiki | |
| Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree | ||
| Demonstrate the implementation of any fluidic system. Document via video, images, and text how you fabricated and tested any milli-, micro- or nano-fluidic system. | ??? | |
| Document and submit your fluidic system to the "Metafluidics" repository of device and hardware designs. | microfluidic parts | |
| iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted. | Safety Page | |
| Demonstrate the implementation of a novel fluidic system. This system can be a variation of an existing published system, with novel areas including optimized device geometries, integration of different functional modules (e.g. on-chip mixer and incubator), improved "world-to-chip" interfaces, improved controller hardware, or software. | microfluidics parts | |
| Document what you consider the novel features are compared to previous work. Note this does not require demonstration of biological function. Use an existing fluidic system to miniaturize an established biological process (e.g. PCR) or characterize an existing BioBrick Part or Device. Document any biological protocols performed utilizing your fluidic system. Compare biological protocols conducted on-chip against standard bench top techniques. | Microfluidics Notebook | |
| Utilizing your novel fluidic system, characterize or improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device. Document any biological protocols performed utilizing your microfluidic system. Compare biological protocols conducted on-chip against standard bench top techniques. Upload data collected to the page of the part(s) used on the Registry of Standard Biological Parts via experience page/contribution system. | Microfluidics Notebook | |
| Utilizing any fluidic system, characterize a new BioBrick Part or Device. Document any biological protocols performed utilizing your microfluidic system. Compare biological protocols conducted on-chip against standard bench top techniques. Upload data collected to the page of the part(s) used on the Registry of Standard Biological Parts via experience page/contribution system. | BBa_K1486002 | |
| Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. | ||
| iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). | Safety Page |
Sponsors
Copyright © iGEM EPFL 2014. All Rights Reserved
