Team:Tokyo Tech/Judging Form

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 68: Line 68:
             <span class="meta">What we have archived from this competition </span>
             <span class="meta">What we have archived from this competition </span>
-
             <div class="entry-long">
+
             <div class="entry-long"></div>
               <div id="gototop"><a href="#"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/55/Tokyo_Tech_Go-to-top-icon.png" height="50" /></a></div>
               <div id="gototop"><a href="#"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/55/Tokyo_Tech_Go-to-top-icon.png" height="50" /></a></div>

Revision as of 23:37, 17 October 2014

Tokyo_Tech

Judging Form

What we have archived from this competition
   
Judging Form
   

Parts Improvement

We constructed an improved Prhl promoter by improving native Prhl promoter (BBa_R0071).

 
Fig. 7-5-1. Fluorescence intensity detected by flow cytometer
 

By changing RhlR binding site and LuxR binding site, we designed Prhl(RL) promoter (BBa_K1529300), Prhl(LR) promoter (BBa_K1529310) and Prhl(RR) promoter (BBa_K1529320).

We think we made a big contribution to the iGEM and iGEMers by the construction of an improved Prhl promoter.

> Jump to Parts.

 

Policy and Practice

Our team went beyond what is normally expected from iGEM teams in terms of policy & practices. We had much interactions to discuss modulate course of our project with the general public.

For example, our team members and iGEM Tokyo_Tech 2013 veterans gave a presentation at a workshop called “MUSE TALK”. Managers, executives and technicians working in IT companies participated in this event to learn about things outside their specialty.

> Jump to Policy and Practices.

 
Fig. 7-5-2. Our presentation at MUSE TALK
 

After the presentation, many audiences were impressed with the technology of synthetic biology, and acknowledged it as a research which estimates future prospects.

 

> Original judging form is here.