Team:Evry/Overview/Achievements

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(10 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
-
<html>
+
{{:Team:Evry/Overview/Achievements/Medals}}
-
<FONT color=#003399><h5><b>Gold Medal</b></h5> </font><br>
+
{{:Team:Evry/Overview/Achievements/Prizes}}
-
<p><ul style="list-style-type:circle;">
+
{{:Team:Evry/Overview/Achievements/Projects}}
-
<br>  <li> Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry. Please see the Registry help page on how to document a contribution to an existing part.</li>
+
-
<br>  <li> The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. "Characterization" is a measurement of a functional parameter of a part, preferably in absolute units, that can precisely and repeatably be performed in other labs.</li>
+
-
<br> <li>  Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.</li>
+
-
<br> <li>  iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities. </li>
+
-
</p> <br>
+
-
<FONT color=#003399><h5><b>Silver Medal</b></h5> </font><br>
 
-
<p>
 
-
<br>    Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.
 
-
<br>    Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
 
-
<br>    Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
 
-
<br>    iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted.
 
-
</p><br>
 
-
<FONT color=#003399><h5><b>Bronze Medal</b></h5> </font><br>
 
-
<p>
 
-
<br>  We registered our team for iGEM 2014. https://igem.org/Team_List?year=2014
 
-
<br>  We completed and submitted the Judging form.
 
-
<br>  We made a comprehensive and accessible iGEM Evry 2014 Wiki to convey our educational and scientific advances. https://2014.igem.org/Team:Evry
 
-
<br>  We will present a poster and give an oral presentation at the iGEM Jamboree in Boston, USA.
 
-
<br>  The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services. Please see the iGEM 2011 Imperial College Acknowledgements page for an example.
 
-
<br>  Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry
 
-
</p>
 
-
</html>
 
{{:Team:Evry/Template:HomeFooter}}
{{:Team:Evry/Template:HomeFooter}}

Latest revision as of 00:47, 18 October 2014

IGEM Evry 2014

Overview- Achievements


Medals requirements



Gold Medal

Silver Medal


Bronze Medal

iGEM prizes



Environmental track


  • - Real-time monitoring with a bioactive filtration system, a sponge and its microbiome.

  • - Design with the aim not to introduce a new species in a fragile ecosystem.

  • - Environnementaly safe design, not transferrable to descendance.

  • - Working on an organism people know and are confortable with: the "bath sponge".


Best measurement


  • - Participation to the Interlab Study working not only on the 3 mandatory genetic devices but also the 18 promoters from Anderson’s library.

  • - Designed a phenol biosensor able to detect phenol at lower concentrations than previous teams.


Best Policy & Practices Advance


  • - Extensive report of our philosophical reflexion on the contrast between the ambitions of synthetic biology (rigorous designs) and the reality (trial, error and kludges), which we conducted over the summer.

  • - Debate on the ethical questions raised by the modification of an animal's microbiome, and by the use of an animal as a bioremediation tool in potentially toxic areas.

  • - Reflexion about the risks inherent to the release of genetically modified organisms in seawater, and on the possibility and efficiency of epibiosis as a biological containment.


Best New Basic Part


  • - Bring Transposons Tn10 to the iGEM competition, giving a chance to other teams to develop a project in a wider range of chassis.

Projects Achievements



Chassis characterization


New Vector


  • - Transposon-based vector was created to overcome resistance mechanisms to DNA entrance

  • - Proof of concept to use it in Pseudovibrio denitrificans was achieved


New or Optimized sensors Sensors