Team:Calgary/Project/BsDetector/TargetDiseases

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(50 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{Team:Calgary/ContentPage}}
+
{{Team:Calgary/Main}}
<html>
<html>
-
<section class="Content Text Color-Dark">
+
<section class="Content Text Color-Normal">
<h1>Target Diseases</h1>
<h1>Target Diseases</h1>
-
<p>Our pathogen detection system consists of two collections of interconnected genes (operons) placed inside various regions (loci) of the <Bacillus Subtilis> chromosome. The first operon is designated the "reporter" and consists of a constitutive promoter (<i>Pveg</i>), a ribosome binding site, a repressible operator(<i>C2P22</i>), and a chromophore (<i>LacZ</i>). Our "reporter" operon works in conjunction with our "repressor" operon, which consists of the same promoter ribomsome binding site, and a repressor gene designed to negate the function of aforementioned operator (<i>C2P22</i>). In addition, the repressor gene will be flanked by sequences homologous to a target sequence within our intended pathogen(s). </p>
+
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/PGI3zRNiExQ?list=UU-seezTJ9iriFOIrIi432Mw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
-
<p>By default, when the two operons are placed inside <i>B. subtilis</i>, the repressor operon will act upon the operator of the reporter operon and prevent the translation of the chromophore. With the chromophore not being produced, the <i>B. subtilis</i> will refrain from exhibiting a colorimetric output and remain in what we would call the "negative state". However, when a particular pathogen is introduced to the <i>B. subtilis</i>, it will uptake the target sequence contained within the pathogen through homologous recombination. Essentially, the repressor gene, which is flanked by DNA regions homologous to the target sequence, will be replaced by the target sequence and "knocked off" the chromosome. With the repressor gene absent, the reporter operon will be at liberty to produce the chromophore and cause the <i>B. subtilis</i> to yield a colorimetric output.
+
 
-
<p>A major strength of our project design lies in its high level of customization and modularity. Using our reporter and repressor operons, we can in theory facilitate the detection of any pathogen with an adequately sequenced genome simply by replacing the homologous flanking regions of our repressor gene with the proper sequences. We have also taken cautious measures to ensure that our <i>B. subtilis</i> colonies are harmless in the unlikely event that they escape the casing of our device. The reporter and repressor genes will be placed into the <i>thrC</i> locus of <i>B. subtilis</i> and effectively replace any genes that were originally present in that location. Because the <i>thrC</i> gene is essential for the synthesis of threonine, an essential amino acid, replacing it with our operons will effectively make the <i>B. subtilis</i> incapable of producing endogenous threonine and render it auxotrophic.
+
<h3>A Trend of Misdiagnosis</h3>
 +
<p>Febrile illnesses that pose symptoms similar to malaria are of particular concern in malaria-endemic countries. Patients who present symptoms such as fever, nausea, and headache are often suspected to have malaria before a diagnosis is even made, due predominantly to malaria's high prevalence in these regions. The tragedy lies in the fact that patients who test negative for malaria but show its clinical signs and symptoms are often given antimalarial drugs and considered to have malaria despite their diagnosis <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Sandbox/Notebook/References"#Journals>(Mabey, Peeling, Ustianowski, & Perkins, 2004)</a>. The over-prescription of antimalarials fosters an environment for the continued emergence of drug resistance, unnecessarily taxes healthcare systems, and most importantly, worsens the patient's condition. Clinicians in malaria-endemic countries are presented with a dilemma when patients with symptoms identical to that of malaria are tested negative with commonly used malarial diagnostics such as Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) and microscopic blood smears. On one hand, they know that their patient most likely does not have malaria based on the tests, however, they do not have the diagnostic means to explore the possibility of other diseases and know that missing a case of malaria is considered unforgivable.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Clinicians must make an important decision at this junction based on limited information, the consequences of which could have severe effects on the patient. Some clinicians will opt to treat all cases of fever, nausea, and headache as malaria and indiscriminately prescribe anti-malarial drugs, consequently ensuring that no case of malaria goes unaddressed. The ramifications of such practice can be tremendous, as we have seen in countries such as Uganda, Tanzania, and Sudan <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Sandbox/Notebook/References"#Journals>(Mabey, Peeling, Ustianowski, & Perkins, 2004)</a>. Others must ask themselves the question, "if it's not malaria, then what is it?". Unfortunately, clinicians who fear the consequences of over-prescription and wish to consider alternative diagnoses are left with very few diagnostic options due to limited time and resources.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>We at iGEM Calgary dedicated our summer to developing a solution to this problem. We propose a diagnostic test capable of evaluating the presence of several diseases in parallel, thus opening the door to more routes of treatment and allowing the clinician to make an informed decision regarding treatment plans. Additionally, in cases of a patient being co-infected with both malaria and different febrile illnesses - a common occurrence in malaria-endemic countries - our device will facilitate the diagnosis of all diseases instead of just one. Current malaria diagnostic methods do not offer this feature, which has the potential to lead to dangerous situations. For example, if a co-infected patient is given a malaria RDT and tests positive, the clinician may make the false assumption that the patient <i>only</i> has malaria and remain unaware of other infections. However, our device was not designed with the intent to replace existing gold standard diagnostics that are being used in these regions. Instead, our objective was to offer a comprehensive and affordable diagnostic option that tests for <i>multiple</i> diseases  as <i>economically</i> as possible. We researched a wide spectrum of infectious diseases and decided to target the following:</p>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Typhoid Fever</li>
 +
<li>Dengue Fever</li>
 +
<li>Meningitis</li>
 +
<li>Visceral Leishmaniasis</li>
 +
<li>Schistosomiasis</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
 
 +
<p>Our rationale behind choosing these diseases was the fact that they shared many signs and symptoms strikingly similar to those of malaria. Additionally, these diseases are present in high numbers within malaria-endemic countries (Uganda, Tanzania, Sudan, etc.) making co-infection a significant concern.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/65/Ucalgary2014Diseasetaste.png" width="1000 px" class="Center"></p>
 +
 
 +
<p><center><b>Figure 1:</b> A comparison of clinical signs and symptoms common amongst the targeted febrile illnesses.</center></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is not to say, however, that our device is limited specifically to these diseases. Our device was designed with modularity and customization in mind. By simply switching a few DNA sequences within our genetically engineered <i>B. subtilis</i> our device has the potential to detect virtually any pathogen present in a blood sample whose genome has been sequenced and made available in public repositories. Based on which diseases are common within certain regions of the world, we can modify our device to detect those diseases of interest before shipping it to the end-user. The true strength of our device lies it ability to adapt to different geographic areas and offer a diagnostic assay that is tailored to a specific medical landscape.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><b>Think of our device as the Swiss Army knife of diagnostic tools: affordable, handy, and ready for use in any situation it may encounter.</p></b>
</section>
</section>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 01:57, 18 October 2014

Target Diseases

A Trend of Misdiagnosis

Febrile illnesses that pose symptoms similar to malaria are of particular concern in malaria-endemic countries. Patients who present symptoms such as fever, nausea, and headache are often suspected to have malaria before a diagnosis is even made, due predominantly to malaria's high prevalence in these regions. The tragedy lies in the fact that patients who test negative for malaria but show its clinical signs and symptoms are often given antimalarial drugs and considered to have malaria despite their diagnosis (Mabey, Peeling, Ustianowski, & Perkins, 2004). The over-prescription of antimalarials fosters an environment for the continued emergence of drug resistance, unnecessarily taxes healthcare systems, and most importantly, worsens the patient's condition. Clinicians in malaria-endemic countries are presented with a dilemma when patients with symptoms identical to that of malaria are tested negative with commonly used malarial diagnostics such as Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) and microscopic blood smears. On one hand, they know that their patient most likely does not have malaria based on the tests, however, they do not have the diagnostic means to explore the possibility of other diseases and know that missing a case of malaria is considered unforgivable.

Clinicians must make an important decision at this junction based on limited information, the consequences of which could have severe effects on the patient. Some clinicians will opt to treat all cases of fever, nausea, and headache as malaria and indiscriminately prescribe anti-malarial drugs, consequently ensuring that no case of malaria goes unaddressed. The ramifications of such practice can be tremendous, as we have seen in countries such as Uganda, Tanzania, and Sudan (Mabey, Peeling, Ustianowski, & Perkins, 2004). Others must ask themselves the question, "if it's not malaria, then what is it?". Unfortunately, clinicians who fear the consequences of over-prescription and wish to consider alternative diagnoses are left with very few diagnostic options due to limited time and resources.

We at iGEM Calgary dedicated our summer to developing a solution to this problem. We propose a diagnostic test capable of evaluating the presence of several diseases in parallel, thus opening the door to more routes of treatment and allowing the clinician to make an informed decision regarding treatment plans. Additionally, in cases of a patient being co-infected with both malaria and different febrile illnesses - a common occurrence in malaria-endemic countries - our device will facilitate the diagnosis of all diseases instead of just one. Current malaria diagnostic methods do not offer this feature, which has the potential to lead to dangerous situations. For example, if a co-infected patient is given a malaria RDT and tests positive, the clinician may make the false assumption that the patient only has malaria and remain unaware of other infections. However, our device was not designed with the intent to replace existing gold standard diagnostics that are being used in these regions. Instead, our objective was to offer a comprehensive and affordable diagnostic option that tests for multiple diseases as economically as possible. We researched a wide spectrum of infectious diseases and decided to target the following:

  • Typhoid Fever
  • Dengue Fever
  • Meningitis
  • Visceral Leishmaniasis
  • Schistosomiasis

Our rationale behind choosing these diseases was the fact that they shared many signs and symptoms strikingly similar to those of malaria. Additionally, these diseases are present in high numbers within malaria-endemic countries (Uganda, Tanzania, Sudan, etc.) making co-infection a significant concern.

Figure 1: A comparison of clinical signs and symptoms common amongst the targeted febrile illnesses.

This is not to say, however, that our device is limited specifically to these diseases. Our device was designed with modularity and customization in mind. By simply switching a few DNA sequences within our genetically engineered B. subtilis our device has the potential to detect virtually any pathogen present in a blood sample whose genome has been sequenced and made available in public repositories. Based on which diseases are common within certain regions of the world, we can modify our device to detect those diseases of interest before shipping it to the end-user. The true strength of our device lies it ability to adapt to different geographic areas and offer a diagnostic assay that is tailored to a specific medical landscape.

Think of our device as the Swiss Army knife of diagnostic tools: affordable, handy, and ready for use in any situation it may encounter.