Team:Oxford/codon optimisation

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 59: Line 59:
  <div class="list">
  <div class="list">
  <div class="white_news_block2">
  <div class="white_news_block2">
-
Using the pRSFDuet vector and codon-optimised dcmA, we managed to express dcmA fused to sfGFP in E.coli. We managed to show this using western blots as indicated in the figure below:
+
Using the pRSFDuet vector and codon-optimised dcmA, we managed to express dcmA fused to sfGFP in E.coli. We managed to show this using western blots as indicated in part A of the figure below:
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e5/DCMAsfGFP.jpg" style="float:left;position:relative; width:60%;margin-left:20%;margin-right:20%" />
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e5/DCMAsfGFP.jpg" style="float:left;position:relative; width:60%;margin-left:20%;margin-right:20%" />
Line 65: Line 65:
<br>
<br>
-
As shown in this figure, we have induced expression of dcmA-sfGFP with 0, 0.1 and 1 mM concentrations of IPTG (the inserts in pRSFDuet are under lac-control).  
+
As shown in this figure, we have induced expression of dcmA-sfGFP with 0, 0.1 and 1 mM concentrations of IPTG (the inserts in pRSFDuet are under lac-control). Part B of this figure indicates OD and fluorescence readings of the three samples, showing how sfGPF (and thus expression levels of dcmA) increase at higher IPTG concentrations.
<br>
<br>

Revision as of 01:13, 18 October 2014


Codon optimisation


Introduction: Codon Optimisation

In our quest to optimise the process of DCM breakdown, the first step was to move the genes we were interested in into well-characterised host strains. The source bacterium Methylobacterium extorquens DM4 proved very difficult to grow in the lab, and took its leisurely time once it did decide to grow. It's also not a particularly well-studied bacterium, unlike E. coli and P. putida, which we decided to work with. This section explains the concept of codon optimisation, why we used it, and how we did so.

Cells use codons, which are composed of three consecutive nucleotides, to read the genetic code and translate it into proteins. This genetic code can not only vary between species, but it is also degenerate, meaning that several codons may specify a particular amino acid. Different species have unique codon usage biases, implying that they prefer particular codons over other codons that define the same amino acid. An excerpt of a codon usage frequency table is given for the three strains we worked with to highlight different codon biases.



Since we are expressing the dcmA enzyme from M. extorquens in E. coli and P. putida, we used an online tool to optimise the sequence of dcmA so that it can be translated by our host strains. To ensure that dcmA is not over-produced and therefore a strain on the metabolic capacity of the cell, codon usage was only optimised to ~70%.

Expression of dcmA in E.coli
Expression of dcmA in E.coli
Using the pRSFDuet vector and codon-optimised dcmA, we managed to express dcmA fused to sfGFP in E.coli. We managed to show this using western blots as indicated in part A of the figure below:
As shown in this figure, we have induced expression of dcmA-sfGFP with 0, 0.1 and 1 mM concentrations of IPTG (the inserts in pRSFDuet are under lac-control). Part B of this figure indicates OD and fluorescence readings of the three samples, showing how sfGPF (and thus expression levels of dcmA) increase at higher IPTG concentrations.



Oxford iGEM 2014

Retrieved from "http://2014.igem.org/Team:Oxford/codon_optimisation"