Team:Tokyo Tech/Judging Form

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
-
<meta name="keywords" content="iGEM,2014,Tokyo_Tech,Bank"<i>E. coli</i>/>
+
<meta name="keywords" content="iGEM,2014,Tokyo_Tech,Bank"E. coli/>
<meta name="description" content="iGEM2014 Wiki pages" />
<meta name="description" content="iGEM2014 Wiki pages" />
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />

Revision as of 22:54, 17 October 2014

Tokyo_Tech

Judging Form

What we have archive from this compettion
   
Judging Form
   

Parts Improvement

We construted new Prhl promoter by improving original Prhl promoter (BBa_R0071).
 
Fig. 7-5-1. Fluorescence intensity detected by flow cytometer
 

By changing RhlR binding site and LuxR binding site, we designed Prhl(RL) promoter (BBa_K1529300), Prhl(LR) promoter (BBa_K1529310) and Prhl(RR) promoter (BBa_K1529320).

We think we made a big contribution to the iGEM and iGEMer by the construction of new Prhl promoter.

> Jump to Parts.

 

Policy and Practice

Our team went beyond what is normally expected from iGEM teams in terms of policy & practices. We had much interactions to discuss modulate course of our project with the general public.

For example,　our team members and iGEM Tokyo_Tech 2013 veterans gave a presentation at a workshop called “MUSE TALK”. Managers, executives and technicians working in IT companies participated in this event to learn about things outside their specialty.

> Jump to Policy and Practices.

 
Fig. 7-5-2. Our presentation at MUSE TALK
 

After the presentation, many audiences were impressed with the technology of synthetic biology, and acknowledged it as a research which estimates future prospects.
 

> Original judging form is here.

 

 

Retrieved from "http://2014.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Judging_Form"