Team:UESTC-China/Questionnaire.html

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(15 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 311: Line 311:
}
}
#top{
#top{
-
background-image:url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/42/Top3.png');
+
background-image: url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/89/Uestc_top2.png');
-
width: 53px;
+
width: 65px;
-
height: 84px;
+
height: 138px;
-
position: fixed;
+
position: fixed;
-
top: 80%;
+
top: 70%;
-
margin-left: 1220px;
+
margin-left: 1200px;
-
cursor: pointer;
+
cursor: pointer;
 +
z-index: 999;
}
}
#logo{
#logo{
Line 384: Line 385:
-
#SensorEditingArea{position:absolute; left:0px; top:280px; height:15200px; width:1183px; background-color:#ffffff; padding:60px 0px 0px 30px;}
+
#SensorEditingArea{position:absolute; left:0px; top:280px; height:15100px; width:1183px; background-color:#ffffff; padding:60px 0px 0px 30px;}
.SensorEditingAreaClass p{color:#1b1b1b;position:relative;left:0px; width:1140px; font-size:23px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;  text-align:justify;}
.SensorEditingAreaClass p{color:#1b1b1b;position:relative;left:0px; width:1140px; font-size:23px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;  text-align:justify;}
Line 502: Line 503:
<div id="SensorEditingArea" class="SensorEditingAreaClass">
<div id="SensorEditingArea" class="SensorEditingAreaClass">
 +
<h1 style="color:#1b1b1b; position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:40px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold;font-style: Italic; text-align:center; width:1140px;">Questionnaire</h1>
  <p style="width:1150px;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;color:#1b1b1b; position:relative;font-size:23px;font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;text-align:justify;">
  <p style="width:1150px;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;color:#1b1b1b; position:relative;font-size:23px;font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;text-align:justify;">
-
  This year, the UESTC iGEM team has conducted many human practices to disseminate iGEM and our project. One of them is a questionnaire survey which gathers the information of public awareness of synthetic biology, formaldehyde and last but not least, their perspective on the trans-genetic plant which can absorb formaldehyde. Last, we analyzed our research data, and come to a conclusion of our activity, and made many charts or diagrams to make people easier to understand.
+
  This year, the UESTC iGEM team has conducted many human practices to disseminate iGEM and our project. One of them is a questionnaire survey which gathers the information of public awareness of synthetic biology, formaldehyde and last but not least, their perspective on the transgenic plant which can absorb formaldehyde. Last, we analyzed our research data, and come to a conclusion of our activity, and made many charts or diagrams to make people easier to understand.
  <br/><br/>
  <br/><br/>
Line 549: Line 551:
A. <3000 RMB
A. <3000 RMB
<br/>
<br/>
-
B.3000-6000 RMB
+
B. 3000-6000 RMB
<br/>
<br/>
-
C.6000-10000 RMB
+
C. 6000-10000 RMB
<br/>
<br/>
-
D.>10000 RMB
+
D. >10000 RMB
<br/>
<br/>
<strong>5. Your vocation is _________</strong>
<strong>5. Your vocation is _________</strong>
Line 607: Line 609:
E. allergic dermatitis
E. allergic dermatitis
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
-
<p style="color:#5CC33C"><strong>10. If you buy a new house, which way you prefer to reduce the amount of formaldehyde?</strong>
+
<p style="color:#0000FF"><strong>10. If you buy a new house, which way you prefer to reduce the amount of formaldehyde?</strong>
<br/>
<br/>
A. ventilate to fresh the air   
A. ventilate to fresh the air   
Line 651: Line 653:
D. hybrid rice
D. hybrid rice
<br/>
<br/>
-
<strong>14. what effects you think that synthetic biology or genetic engineering bring to human being?</strong>
+
<strong>14. What effects you think that synthetic biology or genetic engineering bring to human being?</strong>
<br/>
<br/>
A. high yield of grain
A. high yield of grain
Line 661: Line 663:
D. no influence
D. no influence
<br/>
<br/>
-
<p style="color:#5CC33C;"><strong>15. For the plant designed by synthetic biology which absorb formaldehyde, which kind of problem you care more about?</strong>
+
<p style="color:#0000FF;"><strong>15. For the plant designed by synthetic biology which absorb formaldehyde, which kind of problem you care more about?</strong>
<br/>
<br/>
A. the efficiency of absorbing formaldehyde
A. the efficiency of absorbing formaldehyde
Line 709: Line 711:
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px;">Statistic</h1>
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px;">Statistic</h1>
 +
 +
<div width="1000px">
<div width="1000px">
<table  >
<table  >
Line 895: Line 899:
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px;">Analysis</h1>
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px;">Analysis</h1>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6e/QqImage001.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6e/QqImage001.png"></div>
-
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get the information that, for these questionnaires, the number of male slightly exceeded the female’. And this excess is trivial enough to guarantee the scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
+
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get the information that, for these questions, the number of male slightly exceeded the number of female. And this excess is trivial enough to guarantee the scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/53/QqImage002.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/53/QqImage002.png"></div>
-
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get that more than half of the people answered the questionnaire are young aged between 18 and 35. And the people between 35 and 50 also counts a crucial part. The information we get may insured the practicability and scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
+
<p align="center" width="300px">From the charts, we could get that more than half of the people answered the questionnaires were young aged between 18 and 35. And the people between 35 and 50 also counted a crucial part. The information we got may insured the practicability and scientificity of our data collected.<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/QqImage003.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/QqImage003.png"></div>
Line 905: Line 909:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1e/QqImage004.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1e/QqImage004.png"></div>
-
<p>Due to the people received our questionnaire were mostly not graduating students in college, so the revenue people get, finding in this chart under 3,000 counts 52%. And the second most proportion is the people with the revenue between 3,000 and 6,000.<br/></p>
+
<p>Due to the people received our questionnaire were mostly not graduating students in college, so the revenue people got, finding in this chart under 3,000 counted 52%. And the second most proportion was the people with the revenue between 3,000 and 6,000.<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/db/QqImage005.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/db/QqImage005.png"></div>
Line 914: Line 918:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/83/QqImage006.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/83/QqImage006.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 43% people thought that the most serious environmental problem around us is air pollutant. About 30% thought that the most serious problem is water pollution. So the urgent two environmental pollutant people care about is the factor which is crucial to our life such as air and water.
+
About 43% people thought that the most serious environmental problem around us was air pollutant. About 30% thought that the most serious problem was water pollution. So the most urgent two environmental pollutants people care about were the factors which were crucial to our life such as air and water.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
Line 925: Line 929:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ef/QqImage008.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ef/QqImage008.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 29%people recognized that formaldehyde may lead to cancer to people. 24% considered the consequence of formaldehyde is chronic hazard. 18% thought that formaldehyde irritated skin and mucosa.
+
About 29% people recognized that formaldehyde might lead to cancer to people. 24% considered the consequence of formaldehyde was chronic hazard. 18% thought that formaldehyde irritated skin and mucosa.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8b/QqImage009.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8b/QqImage009.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
Most people preferred ventilation above all other choices. And the proportion reached 34%. Also they are fond of green plants and it counts 29%. Besides, 21% people chose activated carbon, 13% chose air purifier, rarely chose photocatalyst, which might due to the unawareness of photocatalyst in my opinion.
+
Most people preferred ventilation above all other choices. And the proportion reached 34%. Also they were fond of green plants and it counted 29%. Besides, 21% people chose activated carbon, 13% chose air purifier, rarely chose photocatalyst, which might due to the unawareness of photocatalyst in my opinion.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
Line 936: Line 940:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/97/QqImage010.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/97/QqImage010.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
People who did not choose plants to absorb formaldehyde is mainly because of the low absorbing efficiency. Also the troublesome of cultivating a plant also counts a lot.
+
People who did not choose plants to absorb formaldehyde was mainly because of the low absorbing efficiency. Also the troublesome of cultivating a plant also counted a lot.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a4/QqImage011.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a4/QqImage011.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 81% people accept the plant designed by the synthetic biology. And 15% people accentuated that they minded accepting this manmade plant. What cannot be ignorable was that there were still 4% people could not accept the plant.
+
About 81% people accepted the plant designed by the synthetic biology. And 15% people accentuated that they minded accepting this manmade plant. What couldn't be ignorable was that there were still 4% people could not accept the plant.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c4/QqImage012.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c4/QqImage012.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
37% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology can be applied in medical science such as synthetic insulin and vaccine. 29% believed that hybrid rice was also one of the application of synthetic biology, and this implied that about 29% people cannot figure out synthetic biology ‘cause hybrid biology was not the application of synthetic biology, and the choice displayed here was just a barricade we made to distinguish the people knew synthetic biology or not.
+
37% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology could be applied in medical science such as synthetic insulin and vaccine. 29% believed that hybrid rice was also one of the application of synthetic biology, and this implied that about 29% people cannot figure out synthetic biology, ‘cause hybrid biology was not the application of synthetic biology, and the choice displayed here was just a barricade we made to distinguish the people knew synthetic biology or not.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/eb/QqImage013.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/eb/QqImage013.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
34% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology can play a role in high yield of rice.33% believed that it counts a lot in cutting the cost of drugs. 30% held the idea that it did a lot in promoting the environment. And only 3% people did not notice the effect made by synthetic biology.
+
34% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology could play a role in high yield of rice. 33% believed that it counted a lot in cutting the cost of drugs. 30% held the idea that it did a lot in promoting the environment. And only 3% people did not notice the effect made by synthetic biology.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/QqImage014.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/QqImage014.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
34% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology can play a role in high yield of rice.33% believed that it counts a lot in cutting the cost of drugs. 30% held the idea that it did a lot in promoting the environment. And only 3% people did not notice the effect made by synthetic biology.
+
About 39% people cared the biosafety of the plant made by synthetic biology, and about 29% paid attention to the efficiency of absorbing formaldehyde.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c5/QqImage015.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c5/QqImage015.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 39% people cared the biosafety of the plant made by synthetic biology, and about 29% paid attention to the efficiency of absorbing formaldehyde.
+
About 94% (77% plus 17%) people were in favor of our project in synthesizing a plant absorbing formaldehyde largely. Only about 4% people held the idea that they cared little about this project for the project had no business with them and 2% people did not back our project due to the potential hazard of synthetic biology.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/38/QqImage016.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/38/QqImage016.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 94% (77% plus 17%) people were in favor of our project in synthesizing a plant absorbing formaldehyde largely. Only about 4% people held the idea that they cared little about this project for the project had no business with them and 2% people did not back our project due to the potential hazard of synthetic biology.
+
When buying the products to absorb formaldehyde, people cared more about biosafety (47%) and the efficiency (32%). About 17% people cared about the price and 4% cared about the portability of the product.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Image017.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Image017.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
When buying the products to absorb formaldehyde, people cared more about biosafety (47%) and the efficiency (32%). About 17% people cared about the price and 4% cared about the portability of the product.
+
When buying the products of absorbing formaldehyde, people prefered to supermarket (58%) and online shopping (26%) than roadside market or stalls.
<br/><br/></p>
<br/><br/></p>
-
<p style="color:#1b1b1b;">There is <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UESTC-China/ExtraAnalysis"><u>more</u></a> analysis of our questionaire,which contains more details of our analysis.</p>
+
<p style="color:#1b1b1b;">There is <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UESTC-China/ExtraAnalysis"><u>more</u></a> analysis of our questionaire, which contains more details of our analysis.</p>

Latest revision as of 02:35, 18 October 2014

UESTC-China