Team:UESTC-China/Questionnaire.html

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 956: Line 956:
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/QqImage014.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/QqImage014.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
34% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology can play a role in high yield of rice.33% believed that it counts a lot in cutting the cost of drugs. 30% held the idea that it did a lot in promoting the environment. And only 3% people did not notice the effect made by synthetic biology.
+
About 39% people cared the biosafety of the plant made by synthetic biology, and about 29% paid attention to the efficiency of absorbing formaldehyde.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c5/QqImage015.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c5/QqImage015.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 39% people cared the biosafety of the plant made by synthetic biology, and about 29% paid attention to the efficiency of absorbing formaldehyde.
+
About 94% (77% plus 17%) people were in favor of our project in synthesizing a plant absorbing formaldehyde largely. Only about 4% people held the idea that they cared little about this project for the project had no business with them and 2% people did not back our project due to the potential hazard of synthetic biology.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/38/QqImage016.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/38/QqImage016.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
About 94% (77% plus 17%) people were in favor of our project in synthesizing a plant absorbing formaldehyde largely. Only about 4% people held the idea that they cared little about this project for the project had no business with them and 2% people did not back our project due to the potential hazard of synthetic biology.
+
When buying the products to absorb formaldehyde, people cared more about biosafety (47%) and the efficiency (32%). About 17% people cared about the price and 4% cared about the portability of the product.
<br/></p>
<br/></p>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Image017.png"></div>
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Image017.png"></div>
<p>
<p>
-
When buying the products to absorb formaldehyde, people cared more about biosafety (47%) and the efficiency (32%). About 17% people cared about the price and 4% cared about the portability of the product.
+
When buying the products of absorbing formaldehyde, people prefered to supermarket (58%) and online shopping (26%) than roadside market or stalls.
<br/><br/></p>
<br/><br/></p>

Revision as of 11:46, 17 October 2014

UESTC-China