The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it
from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website
designers, artists, and commercial services.
Attributions of those outside of the team are stated within the Attributions page
Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project
and submit this part to the iGEM Registry.
The plant specific promoter BS3 which is induced by the TALE AvrBS3.
The methyl-jasmonate induced plant specific promoter PDF 1.2
The AvrBS3 TAL Effector whichinduces the BS3 promoter.
Silver
Requirement
Notes
Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.
INSERT LINK TO PARTS PAGE.
Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
INSERT LINK TO PARTS PAGE.
Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry.
INSERT LINK TO PARTS PAGE.
iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability,
social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and
describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders
consulted.
Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution
in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry.
Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct,
or modeling or simulating their system.
We sent Team Valencia chromoproteins (amilCP and AmilGFP in Golden Gate form) so that they could use these as reporters to check that their gene constructs were successfully transfected into their plant chassis.
iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability,
social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least
one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the
team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM).
"
