Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/Biosafety

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 22:41, 16 October 2014 by Tore (Talk | contribs)


Biosafety - Antibiotic-free Selection

We work on two different biosafety systems.
First of all we aim to implement an selection system without antibiotics. The target of this system is to perform two deletions in the E. coli KRX genome for two genes encoding the alanine racemase. The alanine racemase catalyses the reversible reaction from L-alanin into D-alanin. D-alanin is an important component of the bacterial cell wall. Every plasmid which is used for the transformation should carry the alanine racemase to complement the deletion. Without the uptake of the plasmid the bacterial cells will die because of their lack of cell wall production.The advantage of this system is visible during the scientific research. It can be used for all cloning and selection purposes in labs all around the world. We also work on a second biosafety system which is based on two steps.
For second system the supplementation with L-rhamnose is essential. In the presence of L-rhamnose a rhamnose dependent promotor is activated which leads to the expression of araC and the alanine racemase. The protein of araC inhibits the expression of the PBAD promotor. In the absence of L-rhamnose two kill switches are activated. If the rhamnose dependent promotor is not activated D-alanine could not be produced which lead to the lysis of the cell wall. In addition araC is not expressed anymore. This leads to the expression of the RNase Ba (Barnase) which leads to the lysis of intracellular RNA.

An import aspect of synthetic biology is the interaction of genetically modified bacteria and natural wild types and the question how a novel designed sequence or even a heterologous used sequence would affect the environment.
Drei typen
Künstliche Sequenz oder Proteine, Erste Ansätze untersuchung aber noch ausstehend
Unnütze Gene die dem Organismus und auch der Umwelt keinen Schaden bringen wie etwa RubisCO
Gene mit Selectionsvorteil, wie AB-resitanz toxische Gene und inhibitoren Ist es besser ein toxin bakterium freizusetzen als AB? Im Prinzip gleiche Wirkung durch Vorteil gegenüber anderen, wenn nicht sogar krasser da noch aktiver da generell nicht durch aussen beieinflusst wird
Kontaminationsproblemtik bei AB-frei, die exaktes Arbeiten beeinflussen kann und somit die Biosicherheit, aber toxisch schlimmer
Übertragbarkeit auf andere Organismen
Listeria monocytes (Thompson et al., 1998), Corynebacterium glutamicum (Tauch et al., 2002) or Bacillus subtilis (Ferrari et al., 1985)
References

  • E. Ferrari, D. Henner und M. Yang (1985) Isolation of an alanine racemase gene from Bacillus subtilis and its use for plasmid maintenance in B.subtilis. Nature Biotechnology, vol. 3, pp. 1003 - 1007.
  • A. Tauch, S. Götker, A. Pühler, J. Kalinowski, G. Thierbach (2002) The alanine racemase gene alr is an alternative to antibiotic resistance genes in cloning systems for industrial Corynebacterium glutamicum strains. Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 99, pp. 79 - 91.
  • R. Thompson, H. Bouwer, D. Portnoy, F. Frankel (1998) Pathogenicity and and immunogenicity of a Listeria monocytogenes strain that requires D-alanine for growth. Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, pp. 3552 - 3561.