Why we want to improve it?

Whether the Freiburg's design is efficient or not

According to the experimental record of Freiburg, the success rate is higher than 95%(32/33). However, this result, to some degree, lacks statistical significance.

In the result section, they emphasize that there is a light band at 1200bp, which they believe could indicate that the Golden Gate connection works well. However, after conducting several experiments by ourselves, we found that the key point to indicate whether Golden Gate connection works is not the band at 1200bp. If the band is not clear and specific in the gel, it indicates the experiment doesn’t go well. We can easily find several light bands under the band of 1200bp. Moreover, the second light band is somewhat lighter than the band at 1200bp. Although the Freiburg can explain the results with the repeatability of the TALE sequence, we suppose that the possibility of the mismatch of the sticky ends still can’t be excluded. Frankly speaking, we try to believe that they really made it, but if the success cannot be repeated, there must be something wrong with their system. You can view Detail information in iGEM2012 Freiburg wiki.

The protocols we took to connect the parts of TALE

1. Freiburg's protocol

2. Restriction enzyme digestion of plasmid and TAL direpeats, followed by gel extraction. By the mole ratio, plasmid to TALE is 1 to 5 and TALE to TALE is 1 to 1. Ligation with T4 ligase in 22 ℃ over night.

3. With the same ratio of plasmid and TALE direpeats, add the TALE direpeats one by one and connect them in 22 ℃, 30 minutes.

4. Every two parts connect at one time, and try to make three intermediates of 400bp. And then mix the plasmids to make the complete TALE.

5. The same ratio and connect following the program of 22℃ 2min, 40℃ 30s, 25 repeats.

The motivation to improve 2012 Freiburg’s parts

Unfortunately, all of our attempts failed. We didn’t manage to make a complete TALE, or even make two of them together. However, what is important for us is that when we tried the 5th protocol, we noticed an unexpected result. When we analyzed the sequence result, we found that our left adaptor, 1st part and right adaptor connected together. Why did we get this result? We noticed that their sticky ends are TGAC, GCTC, and ACTC. That is to say, GCTC and ACTC might have connected with each other by mistake. In another word, if the sticky ends are very similar, they probably connect with each other. Although we failed again, the result gave us confidence to improve 2012 Freiburg's parts.

How do we connect certain monomer?

Some advanced tips for TALE protein

1. Given a sample sequence with repeating amino acids:

What XX means is that it determines the certain kind of base. For one unit of repetition, other amino acids can be identical.

2. A fully functional TALE protein contains a segment of sequence before repetitive units, recognizing first base T. It also contains a similar segment sequence but it is only half length as the repetitive unit which can recognize the last base T.

3. The length that can be recognized is not strictly twelve or fourteen. According to the published results, the length of recognition sequence are dependent on the number of monomer.

We can gather 96 bioparts based on Freiburg, and each part has its counterproductive sticky ends base on certain location(1,2,3,4,5 or 6). By picking every two bases on certain location, we are able to design one TALE protein sequence.

Previous Review: Freiburg’s way of connection

The main principle of connection is built upon the idea of Golden Gate Connection.( Sanjana, N. E. et al. A transcription activator-like effector toolbox for genome engineering. Nature Protocols 7, 171–192 (2012).)

The key point of their procedures is a type II Restriction Enzyme, BsmBI enzyme.

The main feature of this enzyme is that the recognition sequence is on only one side of cleavage site. It provides the way which can be used to get certain sticky ends with out breaking the whole sequence. The sticky end has 4bp, and it could be designed for combination of multiple sticky ends. That feature is excellent at first, but we cannot ignore its latent shortcomings.

Let’s analyze the example (AA1) provided by Freiburg.

The underlined sequence is recognized by BsmBI. Vertical bar(|) is the cutting position. As for this sample, TGAC is one sticky end which can combine with six other sticky ends.

Evaluate seven sticky ends designed by 2012 Freiburg

2012 Freiburg's parts have seven sticky ends:

We all know that certain two parts can combine together, under the principle of complementary base pairing. However, is it possible that not totally matched sticky ends can bind together? We found, in fact, the more similar they are, the more possibility that they can form new but incorrect base pairs. Inspired by BLAST algorithm, we evaluated the similarity of every pair of sticky ends.

The higher score, the higher similarity, and the higher possibility of mismatch. The table shows that more than 30% of pairs’ score is equal to 3, which means that the possibility of mismatch cannot be neglected. Even if we employ the relatively loose rule to evaluate the similarity, we can still find that error rates cannot be neglected.

Why not other sticky ends?

The reason why Freiburg used these sticky ends

Failed to contact the original designers of these sticky ends, what we can do is just to find feasible advantages of these combinations.

Let's look at the TALE direpeat unit amino acids sequence:

The first amino acid is Leu, which is essential for all connection process. There are six different codons for Leu.

The 2012 Freiburg project's sticky ends:

The feature of Degeneracy has helped to design seven sticky ends. However, since the codons for identical amino acid are highly similar, this feature, for experimental scientists, is a double-edged sword.

How to improve the Golden Gate sticky ends? A big Table!

Three key questions need to be answered:

1. Is it possible to find perfect match pair?

2. Can we find a certain number of sticky ends with least mismatch possibility?

3. How to make this sticky-end score table?

Key algorithms derived from BLAST algorithm

Loose rule: Match: 1; Mismatch: 0; Gap: 0

Strict rule: Match: 1; Mismatch: 0; Gap: 1

The sticky end is composed of four bases, which means that we can design 256 types of sticky ends, which are represented as a 256*256 table.

Find target groups of sticky ends

To solve the TALE parts problem, we need find seven sticky ends, and the similarity score of each pair in them are less than or equal to 1.

When we select Strict Algorithm to find these ends, it is impossible to find seven sticky ends, that each pair of them has score no more than 1. So we have to select Loose Algorithm.

Convert four-basepair sticky ends to amino acid pairs

We care about whether two amino acids located on our target sequence, rather than the 4bp. So we should convert the sticky ends sequence to amino acid pairs.

Based on the above table, we are able to calculate the total scores of each combination and find the best one.

Best choice for seven sticky ends on TALE protein

Best combination:

Scores Table(Loose rule):

Position in TALE amino acids sequence:

Reconstruct DNA sequences

Two main factors to reconstruct DNA sequences:
1.Use the table of best combination and rearrange the sticky ends according to your demand.
2.There are no BsmBI recognition sequence in the reconstruct DNA sequence.
Final DNA Sequence for NEW TALE protein:

	1        CTGACCCCGG AACAGGTGGT GGCCATTGCA AGCAACGGTG GTGGCAAGCA GGCCCTGGAG
	61       ACAGTCCAAC GGCTGCTTCC GGTTCTGTGT CAGGCCCACG GCCTGACTCC AGAACAAGTG
	121      GTTGCTATCG CCAGCCACGA TGGCGGAAAA CAAGCCCTCG AAACCGTGCA GCGCCTGCTT
	181      CCGGTGCTGT GTCAGGCCCA CGGGCTCACC CCGGAACAGG TGGTGGCCAT CGCATCTAAC
	241      AATGGCGGTA AGCAGGCACT GGAAACAGTG CAGCGCCTGC TTCCGGTCCT GTGTCAGGCT
	301      CATGGCCTGA CCCCAGAGCA GGTCGTGGCA ATTGCCTCCA ACATTGGAGG GAAGCAGGCA
	361      CTGGAGACCG TGCAGCGGCT GCTGCCGGTG CTGTGTCAGG CCCACGGCTT GACCCCGGAA
	421      CAGGTGGTGG CCATCGCCTC CAACGGCGGT GGCAAACAGG CGCTGGAAAC AGTTCAACGC
	481      CTCCTTCCGG TCCTGTGCCA GGCCCATGGT CTGACTCCAG AGCAGGTTGT GGCAATTGCA
	541      AGCAACATTG GTGGTAAACA AGCTTTGGAA ACCGTCCAGC GCTTGCTGCC AGTACTGTGT
	601      CAGGCCCACG GGCTTACCCC GGAACAGGTG GTGGCCATTG CAAGCAACGG TGGTGGCAAG
	661      CAGGCCCTGG AGACAGTCCA ACGGCTGCTT CCGGTTCTGT GTCAGGCCCA CGGCCTGACT
	721      CCAGAACAAG TGGTTGCTAT CGCCAGCCAC GATGGCGGTA AACAAGCCCT CGAAACCGTG
	781      CAGCGCCTGC TTCCGGTGCT CTGTCAGGCC CACGGACTGA CCCCGGAACA GGTGGTGGCC
	841      ATCGCCTCCA ACATTGGTGG TAAGCAAGCC CTCGAAACTG TGCAGCGGCT GCTTCCAGTC
	901      TTGTGCCAGG CTCACGGCCT GACACCGGAG CAGGTGGTTG CAATCGCGTC TAATATCGGC
	961      GGCAAACAGG CACTCGAGAC CGTGCAGCGC TTGCTTCCAG TGCTGTGTCA GGCCCACGGC
	1021     CTGACCCCGG AACAGGTGGT GGCCATCGCC TCTAACAATG GCGGCAAACA GGCATTGGAA
	1081     ACAGTTCAGC GCCTGCTGCC GGTGTTGTGT CAGGCTCACG GCCTGACTCC GGAGCAGGTT
	1141     GTGGCCATCG CAAGCCATGA TGGCGGTAAA CAAGCTCTGG AGACAGTGCA ACGCCTCTTG
	1201     CCAGTTTTGT GTCAGGCCCA CGGA                                       
	

Final Amino acids remain the same：

	1         LTPEQVVAIA SNGGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	35        LTPEQVVAIA SHDGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	69        LTPEQVVAIA SNNGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	103       LTPEQVVAIA SNIGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	137       LTPEQVVAIA SNGGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	171       LTPEQVVAIA SNIGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	205       LTPEQVVAIA SNGGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	239       LTPEQVVAIA SHDGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	273       LTPEQVVAIA SNIGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	307       LTPEQVVAIA SNIGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	341       LTPEQVVAIA SNNGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	375       LTPEQVVAIA SHDGGKQALE TVQRLLPVLC QAHG
	

Corresponding part：

PART-left:
…CTGACCCCGGAGACG

PART1(150bp):
CGTCTCGCCCCGGAACAGGTGGTGGCCATTGCAAGCAACGGTGGTGGCAAGCAGG CCCTGGAGACAGTCCAACGGCTGCTTCCGGTTCTGTGTCAGGCCCACGGCCTGACT CCAGAACAAGTGGTTGCTATCGTGGCGGAAAATGAGACG

PART2(219bp):
CGTCTCTAAAACAAGCCCTCGAAACCGTGCAGCGCCTGCTTCCGGTGCTGTGTCAG GCCCACGGGCTCACCCCGGAACAGGTGGTGGCCATCGCATCTAACAATGGCGGTA AGCAGGCACTGGAAACAGTGCAGCGCCTGCTTCCGGTCCTGTGTCAGGCTCATGG CCTGACCCCAGAGCAGGTCGTGGCAATTGCCTCCAACATTGGAGGGCGAGACG

PART3(262bp):
CGTCTCTAGGGAAGCAGGCACTGGAGACCGTGCAGCGGCTGCTGCCGGTGCTGTG TCAGGCCCACGGCTTGACCCCGGAACAGGTGGTGGCCATCGCCTCCAACGGCGGT GGCAAACAGGCGCTGGAAACAGTTCAACGCCTCCTTCCGGTCCTGTGCCAGGCCC ATGGTCTGACTCCAGAGCAGGTTGTGGCAATTGCAAGCAACATTGGTGGTAAACA AGCTTTGGAAACCGTCCAGCGCTTGCTGCCAGTACGGAGACG

PART4(224bp):
CGTCTCCGTACTGTGTCAGGCCCACGGGCTTACCCCGGAACAGGTGGTGGCCATT GCAAGCAACGGTGGTGGCAAGCAGGCCCTGGAGACAGTCCAACGGCTGCTTCCGG TTCTGTGTCAGGCCCACGGCCTGACTCCAGAACAAGTGGTTGCTATCGCCAGCCA CGATGGCGGTAAACAAGCCCTCGAAACCGTGCAGCGCCTGCTTCCGGTGCTGGGA
GACG

PART5(194bp):
CGTCTCCGCTGTGTCAGGCCCACGGACTGACCCCGGAACAGGTGGTGGCCATCGC CTCCAACATTGGTGGTAAGCAAGCCCTCGAAACTGTGCAGCGGCTGCTTCCAGTC TTGTGCCAGGCTCACGGCCTGACACCGGAGCAGGTGGTTGCAATCGCGTCTAATA
TCGGCGGCAAACAGGCACTCGATGAGACG

PART6(249bp):
CGTCTCATCGAGACCGTGCAGCGCTTGCTTCCAGTGCTGTGTCAGGCCCACGGCC TGACCCCGGAACAGGTGGTGGCCATCGCCTCTAACAATGGCGGCAAACAGGCATT GGAAACAGTTCAGCGCCTGCTGCCGGTGTTGTGTCAGGCTCACGGCCTGACTCCG GAGCAGGTTGTGGCCATCGCAAGCCATGATGGCGGTAAACAAGCTCTGGAGACAG
TGCAACGCCTCTTGCCAGTTTTAGAGACG

PART-right:
CGTCTCATTTTGTGTCAGGCCCACGGA...

The recognition sequence of the TALE protein:

All parts are under artificial synthesis process, so there is few results to present, which can prove our changes are effective. However, with the principle of complementary base pairing, our choice should be better than original version. And if you want our data or use our method to create your own best sticky ends, just contact us!