Team:ETH Zurich/modeling/whole
From 2014.igem.org
Whole cell model
Model
The whole cell model is the combination of the Quorum sensing, Integrase and XOR modules. The model shows the behaviour of the a single cell in response to incoming signals. The model enables us to understand the effect of leakiness, cross-talk and their combinations on the whole system.
Chemical Species
Name | Description |
---|---|
Lux-AHL | 30C6-HSL is an acyl homoserine lactone which mainly binds to LuxR. |
LuxR | Constitutively expressed regulator protein that can bind Lux-AHL and stimulate transcription of Bxb1. |
RLux | LuxR and Lux-AHL complex which can dimerize. |
DRLux | Dimerized form of RLux. |
mRNABxb1 | mRNA of the Bxb1 integrase being transcribed by the Lux promoter. |
Bxb1 | Serine integrase that can fold into two conformations - Bxb1a and Bxb1b. We chose to use a common connotation for both conformations - Bxb1. |
Las-AHL | 30C12-HSL is an acyl homoserine lactone which mainly binds to LasR. |
LasR | Constitutively expressed regulator protein that can bind Las-AHL and stimulate transcription of ΦC31. |
RLas | LasR and Las-AHL complex which can dimerize. |
DRLas | Dimerized form of RLas. |
mRNAΦC31 | mRNA of the ΦC31 integrase being transcribed by the Lux promoter. |
ΦC31 | Serine integrase that can fold into two conformations - ΦC31a and ΦC31b. We chose to use a common connotation for both conformations - ΦC31. |
Bxb1 | Serine integrase that can fold into two conformations called Bxb1a and Bxb1b. Even if those conformations have the same sequence of amino acids, their tertiary structure is different. As it is experimentally difficult to differentiate these two conformations, we chose to to use a common notation for both conformations. |
ΦC31 | Serine integrase that can fold into two conformations called ΦC31a and ΦC31b. Similarly to Bxb1, we chose to use a common notation for both conformations. |
DBxb1 | Dimer of Bxb1. Bxb1a (respectively Bxb1b) forms a dimer DBxb1a (respectively DBxb1b). To be coherent, dimers are not differentiated depending on their spatial configuration. |
DΦC31 | Dimer of ΦC31. ΦC31a (respectively ΦC31b) forms a dimer DΦC31a (respectively DΦC31b). The different spatial configuration are not taken into account. |
- For the Lux system
$$ \begin{align} &\rightarrow LuxR \\ Lux-AHL+LuxR & \leftrightarrow RLux\\ RLux+RLux &\leftrightarrow DRLux\\ DRLux+P_{luxOFF} & \leftrightarrow P_{luxON}\\ P_{luxON}&\rightarrow P_{luxON}+mRNA_{Bxb1}\\ mRNA_{Bxb1}&\rightarrow Bxb1\\ AHL &\rightarrow \\ LuxR &\rightarrow \\ RLux &\rightarrow\\ DRLux &\rightarrow\\ mRNA_{Bxb1} &\rightarrow\\ Bxb1 &\rightarrow \end{align}$$
- For the Las system
\begin{align} &\rightarrow LasR \\ Las-AHL+LasR & \leftrightarrow RLas \\ RLas+RLas & \leftrightarrow DRLas\\ DRLas+P_{LasOFF} & \leftrightarrow P_{LasON}\\ P_{LasON}&\rightarrow P_{LasON}+mRNA_{\phi C31}\\ Las-AHL &\rightarrow \\ LasR &\rightarrow \\ RLas &\rightarrow\\ DRLas &\rightarrow\\ mRNA_{\phi C31} &\rightarrow \\ \phi C31 &\rightarrow \\ \end{align}
Applying mass action kinetic laws, we obtain the following set of differential equations. $$\begin{align*} \frac{d[Lux-AHL]}{dt} &= k_{-RLux}[R_{Lux}]-k_{RLux}[Lux-AHL][LuxR]-d_{Lux-AHL}[Lux-AHL]\\ \frac{d[LuxR]}{dt} &= \alpha_{LuxR} -k_{RLux}[Lux-AHL][LuxR] + k_{-RLux}[RLux] - d_{LuxR}[LuxR] \\ \frac{d[RLux]}{dt} &= k_{RLux}[Lux-AHL][LuxR] - k_{-RLux}[RLux] - 2 k_{DRLux} [RLux]^2 + 2 k_{-DRLux} [DRLux] - d_{RLux} [RLux] \\ \frac{d[DRLux]}{dt} &= k_{DRLux} [RLux]^2 - k_{-DRLux} [DRLux] - d_{DRLux} [DRLux] \\ \frac{d[P_{LuxON}]}{dt} &= k_{P_{LuxON}} [P_{LuxOFF}][DRLux] - k_{-P_{LuxON}} [P_{LuxON}]\\ \frac{d[mRNA_{Bxb1}]}{dt} &= L_{P_{Lux}} + k_{mRNA_{Bxb1}} [P_{LuxON}] - d_{mRNA_{Bxb1}} [mRNA_{Bxb1}]\\ \frac{d[Bxb1]}{dt} &= k_{mRNA_{Bxb1}} [mRNA_{Bxb1}] - d_{Bxb1}[Bxb1]\\ \end{align*}$$
The same holds true for the Las system.
Characterization: KmLux and KmLas
Data
For the Quorum sensing module we used established experimentally determined parameters for the rate of formation of RLux (reference). Since, in the literature the other parameters were estimated or fitted to their data, we decided to determine the parameters specific to our system. Hence, we used our data for the remaining parameters. Our data was mainly a transfer function of normalized GFP concentration as a function of input Lux-AHL concentrations. (link to data)
Assumptions
From the original set of reactions, we reduce the rate of production of mRNABxb1 as a Hill function of RLux instead of Mass action kinetics in terms of PLuxON and PLuxOFF.
Assumption A
We assumed that the dimerization of RLux to DRLux is quick. Quasi steady state approximation (QSSA) as follows
$$\frac{d[DRLux]}{dt} = k_{DRLux} [RLux]^2 - k_{-DRLux} [DRLux] - d_{DRLux} [DRLux] \approx 0\\$$
Assumption B
Further, from literature, we found that DRLux is specific to DNA and the dissociation constant is low (km = 0.1nM) {Reference}. Therefore, we using QSSA again,
$$\frac{d[P_{LuxON}]}{dt} = k_{P_{LuxON}} [P_{LuxOFF}][DRLux] - k_{-P_{LuxON}} [P_{LuxON}] \approx 0\\$$
Solving, we get the rate of production of mRNABxb1 as $$\frac{d[mRNA_{Bxb1}]}{dt} = L_{P_{Lux}} + \frac{K_{mRNA_{Bxb1}}RLux^2}{K_{mLux} + RLux^2 }- d_{mRNA_{Bxb1}} [mRNA_{Bxb1}]\\$$
where
$$K_{mLux} = \frac {k_{-P_{LuxON}}}{k_{P_{LuxON}}}.\frac {k_{-DRLux} + d_{DRLux}}{k_{DRLux}}$$
is a lumped parameter which we fitted to our data.
Similarly, lumped parameter KmLas was derived for the las system and fitted to a transfer function of normalized GFP concentration as a function of input Las-AHL.
Parameter fitting
We used MEIGO Toolbox to fit the parameters to the transfer functions.
Range of validity of the assumptions
These assumptions hold true for all input Lux-AHL and Las-AHL concentrations.