Introduction

Our aim is to bind carbon dioxide in organic molecules using E. coli. There are many different pathways known for carbon dioxide fixation in bacteria. Most suitable for our application are the 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle and the reductive pentose phosphate cycle also called Calvin cycle. We were looking for aerobic possibilities of carbon dioxide fixation, because of the desired energy source. Electric power should be the only source of energy for our bacteria. Therefore an aerobic cultivation is required. The electrons should pass through the bacterial respiratory chain. Oxygen is needed as the final acceptor of electrons at the end of the respiratory chain. Finally we decided to construct a bacterial version of the calvin cycle (figure 1) which is a well understood carbon dioxide fixation mechanism in plants (Winkel, 2004; Raines, 2003). One reason for our choice was the existence of almost all essentiell enzymes in E. coli. Only enzymes for three steps are missing. The implementation of the 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle would require the heterologous expression of genes for nearly all involved enzymes. All in all would this sum up to at least 12 genes. Nevertheless we developed plans for the construction of both pathways in E. coli.

Figure 1: Pathway of the D-xylose consumption in E. coli for the fixation of carbon dioxide by the RuBisCO from Halothiobacillus neapolitnaus. For this approach the substrate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate needs to be accumulated in the cell. This is realzied be the PrkA from Snyechoccous elongatus.

Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase

The first missing enzyme of the Calvin cycle in E. coli is the sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase). While this enzyme is common in plants only a few bacterial versions of it are known. One bacterial SBPase was recently identified and characterized (Stolzenberger et al. in 2013). The origin of this sequence is the thermophilic Bacillus methanolicus, which lives at 50°C. Therefore the temperature optimum of this enzyme is also at 50°C (Stolzenberger et al., 2013). We would like to use this enzyme at 37°C in E. coli. It had not escaped our notice that this temperature difference could cause a significant reduction in activity (Peterson et al., 2007). To our best knowledge there are no better fitting bacterial enzymes available. Terefore we decided to clone the coding sequence of glpX^C into pSB1C3. This BioBrick should then be combined with a strong promotor to enable a heterologous overexpression in E. coli. We selected the T7 (BBa_I719005) and Ptac ( BBa_K731500 ) promotors for this task. The T7 is at least suitable for a simple overexpression, but could cause the building of inclusion bodies (Tabor and Richardson, 1985). The resulting protein could be analysed by SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. This methods are suitable to show the synthesis of GlpX. Additionally there is an enzyme assay available to validate the function of this protein (Stolzenberger et al., 2013). The expression for this assay should be done under the controll of the Ptac promotor.

Phosphoribulokinase

The next critical step of the Calvin cycle is the phosphorylation of riublose-5-phosphate. This reaction is catalyzed by the phosphoribulokinase. E. coli lacks such an enzyme. Therefore a phosphoribulokinase encoding sequence (prkA) is taken from Synechococcus elongatus. It was functionally tested before (Parikh et al., 2006). The evolutionary distance between these two species is huge and the codon usage is different. Therefore we ordered the synthesis of a codong optimized sequence for E. coli(BBa_K1465201). The function of this enzyme could be analysed by the toxicity of its product. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate is not metabolized in the wildtype of E. coli(Parikh et al., 2006). It is also possible to detect ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate via HPLC-ESI-MS. For both purposis is the expression in E. coli necessary. Therefore we placed the coding sequence of prkA under the control of the Ptac and T7 promoter respectively(BBa_K1465212 and pSB1A2-T7:prkA).

RubisCO

The most important step is the actual carbon dioxide fixing reaction. It is catalyzed by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate-carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) in plants. The position of this reaction in the whole pathway is shown in figure 1.
We looked for a bacterial ezymes and selected two different RuBisCOs. One is an enzyme from the carboxysome of Halothiobacillus neapolitanus (Bonacchi et al., 2011). The other one is from Synechococcus elongatus (Long et al., 2007). We decided to work on both enzymes and to make a comparison between them.
First of all the coding sequences of the H.neapolitanis RubisCO () and of the S.elongatus RubisCO should be cloned. The first characterisation approach is an overexpression in E.coli. Therefore we designed pSB1A2-T7:Hneap. The protein could be identified by SDS-PAGE separation of the protein extract and a following MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. We are interessted in the difference of the protein extract between one induced and one uninduced culture.
To validate the enzyme function of the RubisCO we would like to coexpress it with the phosphoribulokinase. The toxicity of the PrkA should be avoided by the activity of the RubisCO. The produced ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate is no longer a metabolic dead end. Our RubisCO should use this metabolite as substrate and thereby close this pathway. We designed BBa_K1465214 for the coexpression of BBa_1465201 and BBa_K1465202.
The removal of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate by the RubisCO implies another method to demonstrate the function of the heterologous expressed protein. An protein extract from the wild type should not degrade ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate as mentioned before. If our RubisCO is functional in E. coli we expect the removal of this substance. BBa_K146213 was designed for an heterologous expression in E. coli.
The RubisCO from H. neapolitanus is usually located in a special microcompartiment called "carboxysome"(Bonacchi et al. in 2011). Therefore we decided to construct a carboxysome in E. coli.
We would like to compare the enzymatic activity inside the carboxysome and in the cytoplasm. The separation of enzymes from both compartments could be achieved by ultracentrifugation and a following enzyme assay.

Carboxysome

The carboxysome ensures an efficient carbon fixation reaction. It separates the RubisCO from the aerobic cytoplasm. The concentration of carbon dioxide is selectively increased inside the carboxysome (Reinhold et al., 1991; Dou et al., 2008; Mangan and Brenner, 2014). We selected the carboxysome encoding plasmid pHnCBS1D from H. neapolitanus as template for our synthetic construct.
The gene cluster of the carboxysome contains many illegal restriction sites. Therefore we decided to order some synthetic sequences to replace special parts of pHnCBS1D. This synthesis is not just used to remove the illegal restriction sites, but also allowed an optimization of the codon usage for expression in E. coli.
The assembly should be started at the downstream end of the carboxysome operon. We would like to analyse the effect of csoS1D on the carboxysome. Therefore the construction will be done in parallel with and without csoS1D. The illegal restriction sites of csoS1CAB and csoS4AB will be removed by PCR. We would like to construct pSB1C3-csoS4AB-csoS1CAB (BBa_1465206) from four different pcr products in a single Gibson-assembly. In the next step csoS1D could be added from pSB1C3-csoS1D (BBa_K1465207) by suffix assembly.
The next step is the addition of csoS3, which encodes the carbonic anhydrase, to the existing construct pSB1C3-csoS4AB-csoS1CAB with and without csoS1D by prefix assembly. Afterwards is csoS2, which encodes the shell associated protein, added to the existing construct BBa_K1465208 by prefix assembly. The resulting construct should encode a complete carboxysome (Bonnachi et al, 2012).
The complete carboxysome encoding plasmid could then be combined with the RubisCO encoding sequence and prkA under the control of a strong and induvible promotor e.g. Ptac. Therefore we would use a prefix assembly. This step would produce a large plasmid, which encodes all proteins needed for carbon dioxide fixation in E.coli.
To demonstrate the correct carboxysome assembly on protein level csoS1A should be translational fused with gfp. The fluorescence of GFP can be used to indicate the correct folding of a protein (Waldo et al., 1999; Hsu et al., 2009). Therefore we designed BBa_K1465222. We would like to analyse the function of the gene product of csoS2 in the carboxysome assembly by trying an assembly without CsoS2. Of course the construction of BBa_K1465223 was necessary for comparison. The fluorescence from GFP can be quantified by photometric measurements. The correct assembly of the entire carboxysome could be visualized by fluorescence microscopy.

Phosphofructokinase / Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase

The activity of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) and phosphofructokinase (PFK) forms a futile cycle. The PFK consumes ATP to phosphorylate the fructose-6-phosphate while the FBPase removes the phosphate. The regulation of both enzymes is well understood in plants (Michelet et al., 2013). E. coli is strict heterotroph so there is no need to switch between oxidative and reductive pentose phosphate pathway. Usually the glycolysis is active. We would like to change this. Therefore we need to reduce the phosphofructokinase activity to a minimum. To avoid the complications of chromosomal modifications we decided to try a knock-down approach. There are two PFK encoding genes in E. coli, which are called pfkA (Hellinga & Evans, 1985) and pfkB (Daldal, 1984). The PfkA accounts for 90% of the phosphofructokinase activity in E. coli (Hellinga & Evans, 1985). Hence we will focus on the knock down of the PfkA expression.
We ordered the synthesis of two sequences, which are complementary to the start of the corresponding pfk transcripts. The in vivo transcription of these sequences will produce small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), which will knock down the expression of PfkA (sRNA-pfkA and sRNA-pfkB) respectively. Both sequences include a strong terminator downstream of the complementary sequence to avoid unnecessary transcription. The designed constructs for pfkA are pSB1C3-sRNApfkA (BBa_K1465225), the sequence under control of the Ptac promoter (BBa_1465226) and the sequence under control of the T7 promoter (BBa_1465227). These constructs could be used in growth experiments to compare their impact on the cellular metabolism. Their effects could be compared to a knockout mutant of the pfkA (JW3887-1).
Additionally the overexpression of an FBPase encoding sequence would be useful. The overexpression of glpX is already planned. Its product is actually an FBPase with a little SBPase activity (Stolzenberger et al., 2013). If there is enough of this enzyme to cover the need for an SBPase there will also be enough for the FBPase function. In addition we could use the endogenous FBPase from E. coli.

Summary

If it is possible to enable the whole cycle in E. coli the cells should be able to grow with carbon dioxide as sole carbon source. Nevertheless there is still a need for an energy source. We would like to address this issue by inventing an electroautotrophic E. coli strain. As a backup we think of feeding a pentose (e.g. xylose) to support the Calvin cycle in case the efficiency of the newly created electroautotrophic metabolism is not high enough.
To engineer an autotrophic E. coli strain we need to fullfill the following tasks:

• heterologous expression of glpX^C from B. methanolicus in E. coli
• heterologous expression of prkA from S.elongatus in E. coli
• construction of a plasmid encoding a carboxysome
• production of a functional carboxysome in E.coli
• heterologous expression of an RubisCO in E.coli
• knock down of pfkA to avoid an futile cycle
• invention of an energy feeding mechanisms (e.g. electric)