Modeling

For our two-dimensional Biosensor, we thought of different methods to generate faster and stronger fluorescence responses from weak promotors. We were inspired by a recently published engineered dark quencher, called REACh, that is able to extinguish the fluorescence of EGFP. In our system, we wanted a fusion protein of EGFP with the dark quencher to be cleaved by the very efficient TEV protease that would then be introduced behind the weak quorum sensing promotor.

An amplified reporter system Expression of the TEV protease is induced by 3-oxo-C12-HSL. The protease cleaves the GFP-REACh fusion protein to elicit a fluorescence response.

To determine if this idea was actually feasible, we decided to model the system using the CAD tool TinkerCell (Chandran, Bergmann and Sauro, 2009).

Model of the molecular approach and the output over time The molecular setup of the novel biosensor (left) yields results indicating a strong and fast fluorescence output after induction (right). A directly inducible system was modeled and added to the plot for comparison.

To compare the response time of the fluorescence signal between our theoretical system and a traditional biosensor, we included a direct expression of GFP in the same plot (above). In the results show above, the strength of the promotor used for the direct GFP expression (traditional approach) is even twice as high as the strength of the promotor upstream of the TEV coding sequence in our new approach. Despite the weaker promotor, a higher GFP concentration is generated in the model of the novel biosensor, predicting a quicker responde time of our system.

The model predicted that our approach should be an improvement over the commonly used direct expression, so we proceded with the clonings and assembled plasmids to test the system.

As the first experimental data came in, we correlated the experimental data gathered from the characterization of the double plasmid system K1319014 + K1319008 to the model. Due to the complexity of the quorum sensing circuit, we assembled an IPTG-inducible TEV protease instead of the 3-oxo-C₁₂-HSL-inducible version. Although the modeled system and the existing system differ regarding the induction mechanism, the correlation was high. However, since the final 3-oxo-C₁₂-HSL inducible construct could not be built in time, a new model was designed according to the existing and functional double plasmid system.

Revised model of the molecular approach and output over time. This model is for the IPTG-inducible double plasmid system (left) and the calculated output (right). Experimental data was included in the plot for comparison and data validation.

The model was fitted to the data gathered from the characterization experiment conducted in shake flasks. Additionally, the data from the characterization experiment of the double plasmid construct K1319014 + K1319008 in the chip system was included in the plot. The data was derived from the plate reader output of the four central spots of the chip. The development of the fluorescence is presented in here. It is shown that the fluorescent response occurs later than in the characterization experiment in shake flasks. This is explainable as the solid agar chip poses a greater diffusion barrier than liquid medium as used in the shake flasks. Further, the rate of fluorescence increase over time is smaller than in the characterization experiments in shake flasks. The reason for that is the oxygen limitation of the sensor cells when embedded in the agar chips.

References

• Chandran, D., Bergmann, F. T., & Sauro, H. M. (2009). TinkerCell: modular CAD tool for synthetic biology. Journal of biological engineering, 3(1), 19. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-3-19