Team:Aachen/Collaborations/Neanderlab
From 2014.igem.org
(→School Project at the NEAnderLab) |
(→School Project at the NEAnderLab) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
As a part of our initiative to spark interest for (synthetic) biology and DIY hardware in the young generation, we cooperated with the high school ''Gymnasium am Neandertal'' to bring a grade 11 biology standard level class into the lab. | As a part of our initiative to spark interest for (synthetic) biology and DIY hardware in the young generation, we cooperated with the high school ''Gymnasium am Neandertal'' to bring a grade 11 biology standard level class into the lab. | ||
- | ==Summary of the Day== | + | ===Summary of the Day=== |
The students carried out multiple '''experiments in context of our iGEM project'''. During the day, the students collected samples from an ''E. coli'' TB culture every 30 minutes to observe the exponential growth phase. The optical density was '''measured with our own DIY photometer'''. Overall, the students did a good job of treating their bacterial culture well, as shown in the graph below. | The students carried out multiple '''experiments in context of our iGEM project'''. During the day, the students collected samples from an ''E. coli'' TB culture every 30 minutes to observe the exponential growth phase. The optical density was '''measured with our own DIY photometer'''. Overall, the students did a good job of treating their bacterial culture well, as shown in the graph below. | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
- | ==Evaluation== | + | ===Evaluation=== |
The students were also asked to fill out an evaluation sheet. The '''reception of the program was good''', especially when considering that the class consisted of mostly students that chose biology because they are required to select one of either chemistry, physics or biology and thought that biology was the easiest one and that there would be no math involved (haha!). The results of the evaluation were good, and are shown below. | The students were also asked to fill out an evaluation sheet. The '''reception of the program was good''', especially when considering that the class consisted of mostly students that chose biology because they are required to select one of either chemistry, physics or biology and thought that biology was the easiest one and that there would be no math involved (haha!). The results of the evaluation were good, and are shown below. | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
- | The results of this evaluation clearly shows that the our team members did a '''good job in achieving our goal''': Explaining synthetic biology in a comprehensible and fun way. The students liked the experiments and lessons. This reflects the enthusiasm we observed when working with the students of this biology class. We therefore recommend combining school collaborations like this one to other iGEM teams as a successful way to spread knowledge about iGEM and synthetic biology. High school students are a good target group because they are not | + | The results of this evaluation clearly shows that the our team members did a '''good job in achieving our goal''': Explaining synthetic biology in a comprehensible and fun way. The students liked the experiments and lessons. This reflects the enthusiasm we observed when working with the students of this biology class. We therefore recommend combining school collaborations like this one to other iGEM teams as a successful way to spread knowledge about iGEM and synthetic biology. High school students are a '''good target group''' because they are not prejudiced, are keen to learn more about current developments and also share their experience with their family and friends, potentially resulting discussion of synthetic biology at home. This way, we reach many people |
- | + | ||
{{Team:Aachen/Footer}} | {{Team:Aachen/Footer}} |
Revision as of 20:20, 17 October 2014
|