Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/CO2-fixation/Calvin-Cycle
From 2014.igem.org
Line 273: | Line 273: | ||
<h6 id="gluco-switch">Gluco-Switch</h6> | <h6 id="gluco-switch">Gluco-Switch</h6> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
+ | For the knock-down of the <i>pfkA</i> we used the synthesised sRNA:pfkA. Herewith we wanted to down-regulate the glycolysis to prohibit the bacteria to use sugar as a carbon source for our later experiments. This should cause a reduction of the growth of our bacteria carrying the plasmid. We tried to show this in a cultivation which results are shown in figure XXXX. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <div class="element" style="width:650px"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7f/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_sRNA_pfkA_glucose.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7f/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_sRNA_pfkA_glucose.png" width="650px"></a><br><font size="2"><b>Figure XX:</b></font> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Neither the construct with the p<sub>tac</sub> promoter nor the one with the T7 promoter showed a difference between induced and not induced. As we used M9 glucose as medium for the cultivation there should be a difference in the growth. The HPCL results did not give another hint for the functioning of the sRNA because the induced culture as well as the not induced one showed the same use of glucose.<br> | ||
+ | Maybe it was not enough to only take the sRNA of <i>pfkA</i> so another try would be to integrate the sRNA:pfkB downstream of the sRNA:pfkA to be sure to cover the activity of both phosphofructokinases. Additionally the building of the sRNA should be checked. | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 16:53, 17 October 2014
Module II - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Fixation
Introduction
As already mentioned in the project section we decided to work with the Calvin-cycle. There are different reasons for this. One the one side we searched for a method to cultivate aerobically and on the other side we searched for a cycling system which is not given in every carbon dioxide fixation possibility.
In E.coli are three enzymes missing to enable the whole cycle. Our goal is to transform the missing genes from different organisms. Our main research is based on a publication by Bonacci et al., 2011. The idea was to use the carboxysom as a microcompartiment for E.coli from Halothiobacillus neapolitanus for an efficient RuBisCO activity. The problem of the RuBisCO is the affinity to oxygen which lead to non fixating cycle. A carboxysom establishs a higher concentration of carbon dioxide in the microcompartiment. The substrate for the RuBisCO is provided by an enzyme called phosphoribulokinase which took from Synechococcus elongatus. The last missing enzyme was taken from Bacillus methanolicus and is called sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase (Stolzenberger et al., 2013).
A problem for our system would be the glycolysis which we aimed to inhibit with a knock-down of the phosphofructo kinase. We called this system the gluco-switch.
The main goal for characterization was to establish a new enzyme purification system based on an intein tag with chitin binding domain. It could be used by integrating a coding sequence into the vector.
Phosphoribulokinase
The sequence of the phosphoribulokinase was synthesized to remove illegal restriction sites and to optimize the codon usage for E.coli. We were able to transform the prk into E.coli but without ribosom binding site. As a template for the synthesis we used the prkA of Synechococcus elongatus.
The toxicity of the prk in E.coli was described previously by Parikh et al., 2006 and Bonacci et al., 2012. The toxicity results through the accumulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate which can not be further metabolized. We performed an enzyme assay to identify the functionality of the prkA in E. coli. For this we cultivated the strain and made crude cell extract. The cell extract was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. We compared different approaches. First we incubated a wildtype strain, secondly we incubated the crude cell extract and thirdly we incubated the crude cell extract with 1 mM ribulose 5-phosphate which is the substrate for the prk. The target was to identify ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate with the HPLC. Because the wildtype is not able to produce ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate the prk activity should be easily seen. We were not able to identify the product with HPLC in all approaches. For performing a SDS-Page we cultivated the prkA and induced with 1 mM IPTG. In comparison to the wildtype the prkA carrying strain showed a similar growth behaviour. The resulting SDS-Page is shown below.
The result of our overall approaches looked like the prkA is expressed by E.coli but does not show a functionality in an in vitro assay. A possible problem is the light dependent activation of the prk. This activation is triggered by thioredoxin which is maybe not present sufficiently. As previously described it would be possible to activate the prkA by adding DTT in the enzyme assay (Hariharan et al., 1998) which would be our next try for an enzyme assay.
Sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase
For the characterization of the sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase / glpX) we did an enzyme assay with a His-Tag purification as described before (Stolzenberger et al., 2013).
The proteins were overexpressed by adding 1 mM IPTG for the T7 promotor. The increasing amount of protein could be verified through a SDS-PAGE..
|
Reaction mix:
- 20 mM Fructose 6-phosphate
- 20 mM Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
- 20 mM Dihydroxyacetonephosphate
- 10 µM Thiamine pyrophosphate
- 2 mM Manganese chloride
- 50 mM Tris-HCl
In the first approach we add no enzyme to verify that no product is generated. The second approach includes the transketolase which does the reaction of F6P and GAP to erythrose 4-phosphate. In the third approach fructose bisphosphate aldolase was added which converts erythrose 4-phosphate with dihydroacetonephosphate to sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate. In the last approach the sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase (glpX) was added which results in sedoheptulose 7-phosphate. All intermediates could be verified in all approaches as expected. This measurement showed the activity of the SBPase in vitro (Xylulose 5-phosphate is a byproduct of one of the enzymatical reactions).
We decided to use glpX as a target for amplification and transformation because of the shown acitivity. The finished construct of ptac_glpX in pSB1C3 was cultivated in M9 glucose in comparison to the wildtype. We performed two biological replicates and two technical replicates.
This result shows that the SBPase does not limit the growth maximum of E. coli. The glucose concentration confirmes these results. The wildtype consumes the glucose faster than the mutant strains.
Gluco-Switch
For the knock-down of the pfkA we used the synthesised sRNA:pfkA. Herewith we wanted to down-regulate the glycolysis to prohibit the bacteria to use sugar as a carbon source for our later experiments. This should cause a reduction of the growth of our bacteria carrying the plasmid. We tried to show this in a cultivation which results are shown in figure XXXX.
Maybe it was not enough to only take the sRNA of pfkA so another try would be to integrate the sRNA:pfkB downstream of the sRNA:pfkA to be sure to cover the activity of both phosphofructokinases. Additionally the building of the sRNA should be checked.
Protein purification
For the purpose of characterizing our BioBricks we thought of using enzyme assays to verify the functionality of different proteins. Enzyme assays depend on purified enzymes. A typical purification approach is the His-Tag mediated purification system. The disadvantage of this system is that the tag remains attached at the enzyme after the purification and has to be cleaved afterwards. A further development of this system is the intein tag mediated purification.
By adding an intein tag attached to a chitin binding domain to the enzyme of interest a purification can be achieved. The chitin binding domain binds the column on which chitin beads are stored. After adding binding buffers and washing solutions an elution with DTT allows to cut the attachment of the intein tag to the coding sequence. The enzyme is eluted from the column and can be stored in the desired buffer. The chitin binding domain and intein tag can be eluted from the column afterwards to reuse the column.
We implemented this system in the pSB1C3 backbone by combining the T7 promotor with RBS and intein tag with chitin binding domain.
CTATAGGGAAAGAGGAGAAAT
>GSP_rev
CTAGTGCATCTCCCGTGATGCA
Note: The stop codon of the coding sequence has to be deleted through primer design.
Because of problems during the transformation of the coding sequences we were not able to characterize this BioBrick.
References
-
Stolzenberger et al., 2013. Characterization of Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphatase and Sedoheptulose 1,7-Bisphosphate from the Facultative Ribulose Monophosphate Cycle Methylotroph Bacillus methanolicus. Journal of Bacteriology, Vol. 195, pp. 5112-5122
-
Bonacci et al., 2011. Modularity of carbon-fixing protein organelle. PNAS, vol. 109, pp. 478-483
-
Parikh et al., 2006. Directed evolution of RuBisCO hypermorphs through genetic selection in engineered E.coli. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol. 19, pp. 113-119
-
Hariharan et al., 1998. Purification and characterization of phosphoribulokinase from the marine chromophytic alga Heterosigma carterae. Plant Physiol. Vol. 117, pp. 321-329