Team:UESTC-China/result

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 573: Line 573:
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Expression of four key enzymes in tobacco</h1><br/>
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Expression of four key enzymes in tobacco</h1><br/>
-
<p style="color:#1b1b1b;">We extracted DNA from tobacco plantlets. And then we used specific primers to amplify the target gene to verify the kan-resistant seedlings (Fig.6). Next we extracted RNA from tobacco leaves which are PCR positive. We used  RT-PCR to detect whether target gene was expressed (Fig.7).</p>
+
<p style="color:#1b1b1b;">We extracted DNA from tobacco plants. And then we used specific primers to amplify the target gene to verify the kan-resistant plants (Fig.6). Next we extracted RNA from tobacco leaves which are PCR positive. We used  RT-PCR to detect whether target gene was expressed (Fig.7).</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/58/10.png">
<div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/58/10.png">
<p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:1100px; color:#1b1b1b;"><strong>Fig.6</strong>
<p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:1100px; color:#1b1b1b;"><strong>Fig.6</strong>
-
PCR identification of kan-resistant tobacco seedlings (piGEM010 transgenic line).
+
PCR identification of kan-resistant tobacco plants (piGEM010 transgenic line).
M: DNA marker;
M: DNA marker;
WT: widetype control;
WT: widetype control;
Line 586: Line 586:
<div align="center"><img style="width:45% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/46/Fig_7.jpg"><br/>
<div align="center"><img style="width:45% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/46/Fig_7.jpg"><br/>
<p style="position:relative; left:40px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:600px; color:#1b1b1b;">
<p style="position:relative; left:40px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:600px; color:#1b1b1b;">
-
<strong>Fig.7</strong> RT-PCR verification of positive transgenic tobacco seedlings.
+
<strong>Fig.7</strong> RT-PCR verification of positive transgenic tobacco plants.
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<br/>
<br/>
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Enhanced formaldehyde Tolerance </h1><br/>
<h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Enhanced formaldehyde Tolerance </h1><br/>
-
<p style="color:#1b1b1b;">The transgenic plants and wildtype, which had been grown separately in sealed boxes, were exposed to formaldehyde evaporated from a micro tube (0.5ml) containing formaldehyde solution (37%, 50ul) (Fig.8). One week later we observed the phenotype of transgeneic plants and widetype (Fig.9). We found that the transgenetic seedling is stronger than wildtype after formaldehyde exposure. This indicates that production of <i>HPS/PHI</i>, <i>FALDH</i> and <i>FDH</i> enhanced formaldehyde tolerance of transgenic seedlings to some extent.</p>
+
<p style="color:#1b1b1b;">The transgenic and wildtype plants, which had been grown separately in sealed boxes, were exposed to formaldehyde evaporated from a micro tube (0.5ml) containing formaldehyde solution (37%, 10ul) (Fig.8). One week later we observed the phenotype of transgeneic and widetype plants (Fig.9). We found that the transgenetic plant is stronger than wildtype after formaldehyde exposure. This indicates that production of <i>HPS/PHI</i>, <i>FALDH</i> and <i>FDH</i> enhanced formaldehyde tolerance of transgenic plants.</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9e/12.png">
<div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9e/12.png">
Line 605: Line 605:
<p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:1100px; color:#1b1b1b;">
<p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:1100px; color:#1b1b1b;">
<strong>Fig.9</strong>
<strong>Fig.9</strong>
-
Phenotype testing of transgenetic seedlings and wildtype. A: Before exposure to HCHO. B: Exposure to HCHO for one week. The transgenetic seedling is stronger than wildtype after formaldehyde exposure. 20ul 37% HCHO, one week.
+
Phenotype testing of transgenic plants and wildtype. A: Before exposure to HCHO. B: Exposure to HCHO for one week. The transgenic plant is stronger than wildtype after formaldehyde exposure. 10ul 37% HCHO, one week.
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 12:33, 17 October 2014

UESTC-China