Team:ITESM-Guadalajara/Technology
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 400: | Line 400: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/BIOPHRAMEchemicalprocess.jpg" width="650" height="370"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/BIOPHRAMEchemicalprocess.jpg" width="650" height="370"> | ||
<p align="justify">This means that large quantities of toxic chemicals (such as hydrochloric acid, acetic acid and sodium hydroxide) are released to the environment, damaging the aquatic flora and fauna; furthermore, this process has the inconveniences that cannot guarantee a standard quality of the product, it is expensive (since it requires chemical reagents in each Chitosan production cycle) and the access to it is restricted by the production seasonality of current producers.</p> | <p align="justify">This means that large quantities of toxic chemicals (such as hydrochloric acid, acetic acid and sodium hydroxide) are released to the environment, damaging the aquatic flora and fauna; furthermore, this process has the inconveniences that cannot guarantee a standard quality of the product, it is expensive (since it requires chemical reagents in each Chitosan production cycle) and the access to it is restricted by the production seasonality of current producers.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/11/BIOPHRAMEdisadvantajeschemicalprocess.jpg" width="650" height="370"> | ||
+ | |||
<p align="justify">Therefore, in order to solve these problems, Biophrame Technologies has proposed a novel method using the same three steps described previously to produce Chitosan from shrimp shell, but instead of using chemical substances, use two bacteria fermentations with two microorganisms: B. subtilis and a modified E. coli (see figure below)</p> | <p align="justify">Therefore, in order to solve these problems, Biophrame Technologies has proposed a novel method using the same three steps described previously to produce Chitosan from shrimp shell, but instead of using chemical substances, use two bacteria fermentations with two microorganisms: B. subtilis and a modified E. coli (see figure below)</p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/22/BIOPHARAMEGDLtech2.jpg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/22/BIOPHARAMEGDLtech2.jpg"> | ||
Line 406: | Line 409: | ||
<p align="justify">On the other hand, E. coli is a very common rod shaped, gram-negative, facultative anaerobic and non-endospore forming bacterium, capable of using large quantities of inorganic carbon sources to grow (Förster & Gescher, 2014). Its optimal growth pH and temperature ranges are 6.4-7.2 and 37°C, respectively. We decided to use this bacterium as a recombinant protein producer because it can grows to high densities on inexpensive media and in the presence of chitin, its genome is completely sequenced and it has been used several times as a protein producer due to its capability of an easy transformation and fermentation, low cost and high protein yield (Manderson, Dempster, & Chisti, 2006), (Keyhani, Wang, Lee, & Roseman, 2000), (Roseman & Keyhani, 1997), (Plumbridge & Pellegrini, 2004).</p> | <p align="justify">On the other hand, E. coli is a very common rod shaped, gram-negative, facultative anaerobic and non-endospore forming bacterium, capable of using large quantities of inorganic carbon sources to grow (Förster & Gescher, 2014). Its optimal growth pH and temperature ranges are 6.4-7.2 and 37°C, respectively. We decided to use this bacterium as a recombinant protein producer because it can grows to high densities on inexpensive media and in the presence of chitin, its genome is completely sequenced and it has been used several times as a protein producer due to its capability of an easy transformation and fermentation, low cost and high protein yield (Manderson, Dempster, & Chisti, 2006), (Keyhani, Wang, Lee, & Roseman, 2000), (Roseman & Keyhani, 1997), (Plumbridge & Pellegrini, 2004).</p> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<p align="justify">Therefore, Biophrame Technologies’ innovative process involves the use of an anaerobic fermentation with B. subtilis to carry out the demineralization and deproteinization steps, since B. subtilis is capable of producing proteases and lactic acid. Proteases are enzymes capable to digest long protein chains into smaller fragments by breaking the peptide bonds that link amino acid residues; this means that proteases will be the responsible of eliminating the proteins (deproteinization process) present in shrimp shell. For the demineralization, we propose the use of lactic acid because it can react with the calcium carbonate component in the chitin fraction of the shrimp shell, leading to calcium lactate formation, which in turn precipitates and can be easily removed by washing. This approach leads to a liquor fraction rich in proteins, minerals, and asthaxanthin and to a solid chitin fraction.</p> | <p align="justify">Therefore, Biophrame Technologies’ innovative process involves the use of an anaerobic fermentation with B. subtilis to carry out the demineralization and deproteinization steps, since B. subtilis is capable of producing proteases and lactic acid. Proteases are enzymes capable to digest long protein chains into smaller fragments by breaking the peptide bonds that link amino acid residues; this means that proteases will be the responsible of eliminating the proteins (deproteinization process) present in shrimp shell. For the demineralization, we propose the use of lactic acid because it can react with the calcium carbonate component in the chitin fraction of the shrimp shell, leading to calcium lactate formation, which in turn precipitates and can be easily removed by washing. This approach leads to a liquor fraction rich in proteins, minerals, and asthaxanthin and to a solid chitin fraction.</p> |
Revision as of 05:33, 17 October 2014