Team:Dundee/Modeling/bdsf
From 2014.igem.org
(Created page with "{{:Team:Dundee/Template/header}} <html> <head> <link href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Dundee/bootstrap?action=raw&ctype=text/css" rel="stylesheet"> <link href="http://2014.igem....") |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="container"> | <div class="container"> | ||
<div class="jumbotron"> | <div class="jumbotron"> | ||
- | <h1> | + | <h1>Modelling BDSF</h1> |
<p class="lead">What we did</p> | <p class="lead">What we did</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<div class="col-sm-9 col-xs-9"> | <div class="col-sm-9 col-xs-9"> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>Objectives</h2> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | To investigate why GFP expression was high in the absence of signal in our engineered BDSF system. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
- | + | <div class="row"> | |
+ | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
+ | <h2>BDSF-Induced Phosphorylation of BCAM0228[P] Mediates GFP Expression</h2> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | We constructed models similar to those used in the PQS system to investigate the signal-response behaviour of the BDSF system. Our results verified what we had expected to happen. Phosphorylation of BCAM0228 is induced by BDSF binding to a cell receptor. BCAM0228[P] then activated the expression of GFP through the engineered <i>cvld</i> promoter. In the absence of a BDSF signal, BCAM0228 remained in its unphosphorylated form and GFP expression was repressed. Increasing the signal induced an increased GFP response (Fig 1). | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | <a href="#" class="thumbnail centre"> | ||
+ | <img data-alt-src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ac/BDSF_fig1.png" | ||
+ | src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ac/BDSF_fig1.png" /> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
+ | <hr>BCAM0228 is Phosphorylated by Unknown Compound</hr> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Our experimental results revealed that in the absence of BDSF, the cblD promoter was active in our engineered system and hence GFP expression upregulated. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | <a href="#" class="thumbnail centre"> | ||
+ | <img data-alt-src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1c/BDSF_fig2.png" | ||
+ | src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1c/BDSF_fig2.png" /> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | From our system of equations we know that the expression of GFP is dependant on the levels of BCAM0228[P]. We hypothesised that one possible mechanism by which our cell could be expressing GFP in the absence of signal was by the presence of BCAM0228[P] independent of BDSF-binding mediated phosphorylation. This suggests that an unknown compound could be phosphorylating BCAM0228 in our engineered cells. | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Comparing Fig 2 to Fig 1, it is clear that the model predicts that the expression of GFP is higher when BCAM0228 is being constitutively phosphorylated than in the “normal” case. Moreover, we are also able to conclude that the model predicts that the presence of BDSF has very little effect on the overall expression of GFP when the constitutive phosphorylation process is operating. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | <h2>Conclusions</h2> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Our models predict that an as yet unknown agent phosphorylates BCAM0228 in the absence of a BDSF signal and that in fact the level of the BDSF signal has little quantifiable effect on GFP expression in our engineered cells. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<!--END OF CONTENT--> | <!--END OF CONTENT--> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 16:43, 11 October 2014
Modelling BDSF
What we did
Objectives
To investigate why GFP expression was high in the absence of signal in our engineered BDSF system.
BDSF-Induced Phosphorylation of BCAM0228[P] Mediates GFP Expression
We constructed models similar to those used in the PQS system to investigate the signal-response behaviour of the BDSF system. Our results verified what we had expected to happen. Phosphorylation of BCAM0228 is induced by BDSF binding to a cell receptor. BCAM0228[P] then activated the expression of GFP through the engineered cvld promoter. In the absence of a BDSF signal, BCAM0228 remained in its unphosphorylated form and GFP expression was repressed. Increasing the signal induced an increased GFP response (Fig 1).
BCAM0228 is Phosphorylated by Unknown Compound
Our experimental results revealed that in the absence of BDSF, the cblD promoter was active in our engineered system and hence GFP expression upregulated.
From our system of equations we know that the expression of GFP is dependant on the levels of BCAM0228[P]. We hypothesised that one possible mechanism by which our cell could be expressing GFP in the absence of signal was by the presence of BCAM0228[P] independent of BDSF-binding mediated phosphorylation. This suggests that an unknown compound could be phosphorylating BCAM0228 in our engineered cells.
Comparing Fig 2 to Fig 1, it is clear that the model predicts that the expression of GFP is higher when BCAM0228 is being constitutively phosphorylated than in the “normal” case. Moreover, we are also able to conclude that the model predicts that the presence of BDSF has very little effect on the overall expression of GFP when the constitutive phosphorylation process is operating.
Conclusions
Our models predict that an as yet unknown agent phosphorylates BCAM0228 in the absence of a BDSF signal and that in fact the level of the BDSF signal has little quantifiable effect on GFP expression in our engineered cells.