"
Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:sBa F0001/information
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{Sheffield2014_socio-reg-template}} <div id="registrycontent"> =Part X= __TOC__ ==Strengths== The conflict theory looks for moral ends to remove this universality of one gr...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<div id="registrycontent"> | <div id="registrycontent"> | ||
| - | =Part | + | =Part sBa_F0001: information= |
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Strengths== | ==Strengths== | ||
The conflict theory looks for moral ends to remove this universality of one group taking power. It seeks to justify it on the grounds of ‘freedom for all’ | The conflict theory looks for moral ends to remove this universality of one group taking power. It seeks to justify it on the grounds of ‘freedom for all’ | ||
| + | |||
==Limitations== | ==Limitations== | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
*The theory is very negative. It states that humanitarian acts and civil rights movements were all acts in order to control society better, rather than to promote peace. | *The theory is very negative. It states that humanitarian acts and civil rights movements were all acts in order to control society better, rather than to promote peace. | ||
| - | |||
| + | ==Further information== | ||
| + | *This book | ||
| + | *That book | ||
| + | *A paper | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 13:56, 10 October 2014
Registry of Standard Policy and Practice Parts
Part sBa_F0001: information
Contents |
Strengths
The conflict theory looks for moral ends to remove this universality of one group taking power. It seeks to justify it on the grounds of ‘freedom for all’
Limitations
There are several limitations of the social conflict theory:
- There is a lack of scientific research when dealing with interpersonal conflict so there may not be grounds to uphold the theory.
- Incorporation of the theory in different environments is difficult. For example, it is difficult to link family dynamics to class, work and labour.
- The theory is very negative. It states that humanitarian acts and civil rights movements were all acts in order to control society better, rather than to promote peace.
Further information
- This book
- That book
- A paper
