Team:CU-Boulder/Notebook/Phage Team
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{:Team:CU-Boulder/Wiki}} {{Template:UCB-NavBar}} <html>") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {{: | + | {{Template:UCB-Main}} |
- | {{ | + | {{UCB-NavBar}} |
- | + | __FORCETOC__ | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Week 1== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::'''Notes:''' Unless stated otherwise, all gels contain 2-log ladder | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/9''' | ||
+ | *•Obtained BW23115 KanR cells- BW23115 cells that had their native CRISPR-Cas system knocked out by the insertion of a Kanamycin resistance gene | ||
+ | **-Will also be called BW23115 or BW | ||
+ | **-Conjugated BW23115 KanR cells with contain F’ notation (ex. BWF’) | ||
+ | *•Obtained ER2738 cells that contain the F’ episome (no changes from NEB sample) | ||
+ | **-Will also be called ER. Assume that all ER samples contain the F’ episome | ||
+ | **-Streaked sample onto LB+Tet (20ug/mL) to select for colonies containing F’ episome | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/10''' | ||
+ | *•Did receive colonies from 5/9 selection | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Week 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/12''' | ||
+ | *•Need to conjugate BW23115 KanR cells with the F’ episome | ||
+ | **-Set up overnight cultures of ER2738 and BW23115 KanR | ||
+ | **-When mixed, ER2738 will donate it’s F’ episome and BW23115 KanR will receive the F’ episome. F’ episome confers Tetracycline resistance | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/13''' | ||
+ | *•Started M13 Amplification: Amplify M13 phage using the M13K07 Helper Phage | ||
+ | **-Let precipitated in NaCl/PEG solution overnight | ||
+ | **-Possible sources of error | ||
+ | ::::Did not sterilize 2.5M NaCl/20% PEG-8000 solution | ||
+ | ::::Added 4-fold PEG solution | ||
+ | ****•Compensated by adding more LB | ||
+ | ::::During precipitation, put sample in -20C for 30 minutes before realizing mistake and moving to it to 4C. Sample partially froze | ||
+ | *•Conjugated BW23115 with F’ episome | ||
+ | **-Added 1mL BW23115 to 1mL ER2738 overnight culture | ||
+ | **-Incubated at 37C for 30 minutes, shaking | ||
+ | **-Plated on LB+Kan(50ug/mL)+Tet(20ug/mL) | ||
+ | ::::To select for BW cells that took the F’ episome (containing Tet resistance) | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/14''' | ||
+ | *•Finished the M13 Amplification | ||
+ | **-Visualized product on UV-vis. There was a tall spike at 269nm indicating that DNA was present. Did not test at 320nm. | ||
+ | *•Results of BW23115 Conjugation | ||
+ | **-Many colonies indicating successful conjugation of F’ episome into BW23115 | ||
+ | **-Set up overnight to make freeze down tomorrow | ||
+ | *•Set up overnight of ER2738 to make chemically competent tomorrow | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/15''' | ||
+ | *•Made freeze down of BW23115 KanR F’ | ||
+ | **-BW23115 E. coli strain with Kanamycin resistance gene inserted into genome and with F’ episome | ||
+ | *•Made chemically competent ER2738 cells | ||
+ | *•Transformation of Litmus28i (from NEB) into chemically competent ER2738 cells | ||
+ | **-Added 1ul Litmus28i plasmid to 40ul competent cells | ||
+ | **-Plated on LB + Amp(100ug/mL) | ||
+ | **-Purpose: To make M13 phage that package Litmus28i DNA. Need phagemid (Litmus28i) DNA in infectable cells (cells containing F’ episome) to introduce M13K07 Helper Phage and make phage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/16''' | ||
+ | *•Results of 5/15 transformation | ||
+ | **-No growth for No DNA control | ||
+ | **-Many colonies for sample | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Week 3== | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/19''' | ||
+ | *•M13 Amplification to isolate M13-Litmus28i phage | ||
+ | **-Cells: ER2738 cells containing Litmus28i phagemid | ||
+ | **-Helper Phage: M13K07 | ||
+ | **-Not much phage was precipitated | ||
+ | *•Set up overnight culture of ER2738 to infect tomorrow | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/20''' | ||
+ | *•Infected ER2738 cells with M13-Litmus28i phage | ||
+ | **-Plated only on Ampicillin(100ug/mL) (should have also plated on kanamycin) | ||
+ | **-Infected for 4-5 hours-> should have only infected for 30 minutes maximum. This extra time gives the cells that were infected with M13-M13K07 the time to produced M13-M13K07 phage and reinfect | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/21''' | ||
+ | *•Results from M13-Litmus28i infection of ER2738 | ||
+ | **-Solid lawn of growth for diluted and non-diluted | ||
+ | **-Also sickly looking growth | ||
+ | *•Set up overnights | ||
+ | **-ER2738 cells containing Litmus28i for freeze down | ||
+ | **-BW23115 with F’ episome to make chemically competent cells | ||
+ | **-ER2738 to redo infection | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/22''' | ||
+ | *•Tested absorbance of phage produced through M13 amplification on 5/19 | ||
+ | **-Low absorbance of 0.018 at 269nm but no detection at wavelength 320nm | ||
+ | **-Decided to redo M13 amplification | ||
+ | *•Made chemically competent BW23115 with f-episome | ||
+ | *•Made freeze down of ER2738 containing Litmus28i | ||
+ | *•Set up overnight of ER2738 containing Litmus28i to redo M13 amplification tomorrow | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''5/23''' | ||
+ | *•Protocol switch to make phage using phagemid | ||
+ | **-“M13 Amplification” protocol should only be used to make more M13-M13K07, not to make M13 phage containing a different phagemid | ||
+ | **-Switched to new protocol (“Use of M13K07 Helper Phage for isolation of single stranded phagemid DNA” by NEB. Made modifications (see our protocols) to isolate phage rather than single-stranded DNA) | ||
+ | **-Making phage…. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *•Made fresh antibiotics | ||
+ | **-Chloramphenicol (34 ng/mL) | ||
+ | ::::1.44g chloramphenicol into 42mL EtOH | ||
+ | **-Ampicillin (50 ng/mL) | ||
+ | ::::4g ampicillin into 80mL mili-Q H2O |
Revision as of 05:32, 4 October 2014
Contents |
Week 1
- Notes: Unless stated otherwise, all gels contain 2-log ladder
5/9
- •Obtained BW23115 KanR cells- BW23115 cells that had their native CRISPR-Cas system knocked out by the insertion of a Kanamycin resistance gene
- -Will also be called BW23115 or BW
- -Conjugated BW23115 KanR cells with contain F’ notation (ex. BWF’)
- •Obtained ER2738 cells that contain the F’ episome (no changes from NEB sample)
- -Will also be called ER. Assume that all ER samples contain the F’ episome
- -Streaked sample onto LB+Tet (20ug/mL) to select for colonies containing F’ episome
5/10
- •Did receive colonies from 5/9 selection
Week 2
5/12
- •Need to conjugate BW23115 KanR cells with the F’ episome
- -Set up overnight cultures of ER2738 and BW23115 KanR
- -When mixed, ER2738 will donate it’s F’ episome and BW23115 KanR will receive the F’ episome. F’ episome confers Tetracycline resistance
5/13
- •Started M13 Amplification: Amplify M13 phage using the M13K07 Helper Phage
- -Let precipitated in NaCl/PEG solution overnight
- -Possible sources of error
- Did not sterilize 2.5M NaCl/20% PEG-8000 solution
- Added 4-fold PEG solution
- •Compensated by adding more LB
- During precipitation, put sample in -20C for 30 minutes before realizing mistake and moving to it to 4C. Sample partially froze
- •Conjugated BW23115 with F’ episome
- -Added 1mL BW23115 to 1mL ER2738 overnight culture
- -Incubated at 37C for 30 minutes, shaking
- -Plated on LB+Kan(50ug/mL)+Tet(20ug/mL)
- To select for BW cells that took the F’ episome (containing Tet resistance)
5/14
- •Finished the M13 Amplification
- -Visualized product on UV-vis. There was a tall spike at 269nm indicating that DNA was present. Did not test at 320nm.
- •Results of BW23115 Conjugation
- -Many colonies indicating successful conjugation of F’ episome into BW23115
- -Set up overnight to make freeze down tomorrow
- •Set up overnight of ER2738 to make chemically competent tomorrow
5/15
- •Made freeze down of BW23115 KanR F’
- -BW23115 E. coli strain with Kanamycin resistance gene inserted into genome and with F’ episome
- •Made chemically competent ER2738 cells
- •Transformation of Litmus28i (from NEB) into chemically competent ER2738 cells
- -Added 1ul Litmus28i plasmid to 40ul competent cells
- -Plated on LB + Amp(100ug/mL)
- -Purpose: To make M13 phage that package Litmus28i DNA. Need phagemid (Litmus28i) DNA in infectable cells (cells containing F’ episome) to introduce M13K07 Helper Phage and make phage.
5/16
- •Results of 5/15 transformation
- -No growth for No DNA control
- -Many colonies for sample
Week 3
5/19
- •M13 Amplification to isolate M13-Litmus28i phage
- -Cells: ER2738 cells containing Litmus28i phagemid
- -Helper Phage: M13K07
- -Not much phage was precipitated
- •Set up overnight culture of ER2738 to infect tomorrow
5/20
- •Infected ER2738 cells with M13-Litmus28i phage
- -Plated only on Ampicillin(100ug/mL) (should have also plated on kanamycin)
- -Infected for 4-5 hours-> should have only infected for 30 minutes maximum. This extra time gives the cells that were infected with M13-M13K07 the time to produced M13-M13K07 phage and reinfect
5/21
- •Results from M13-Litmus28i infection of ER2738
- -Solid lawn of growth for diluted and non-diluted
- -Also sickly looking growth
- •Set up overnights
- -ER2738 cells containing Litmus28i for freeze down
- -BW23115 with F’ episome to make chemically competent cells
- -ER2738 to redo infection
5/22
- •Tested absorbance of phage produced through M13 amplification on 5/19
- -Low absorbance of 0.018 at 269nm but no detection at wavelength 320nm
- -Decided to redo M13 amplification
- •Made chemically competent BW23115 with f-episome
- •Made freeze down of ER2738 containing Litmus28i
- •Set up overnight of ER2738 containing Litmus28i to redo M13 amplification tomorrow
5/23
- •Protocol switch to make phage using phagemid
- -“M13 Amplification” protocol should only be used to make more M13-M13K07, not to make M13 phage containing a different phagemid
- -Switched to new protocol (“Use of M13K07 Helper Phage for isolation of single stranded phagemid DNA” by NEB. Made modifications (see our protocols) to isolate phage rather than single-stranded DNA)
- -Making phage….
- •Made fresh antibiotics
- -Chloramphenicol (34 ng/mL)
- 1.44g chloramphenicol into 42mL EtOH
- -Ampicillin (50 ng/mL)
- 4g ampicillin into 80mL mili-Q H2O