Team:ETH Zurich/expresults/qs
From 2014.igem.org
(→Summary of experimental results regarding quorum sensing) |
(→Summary of experimental results regarding quorum sensing) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{:Team:ETH_Zurich/expresults/qs/tab-plas}} | {{:Team:ETH_Zurich/expresults/qs/tab-plas}} | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
{{:Team:ETH_Zurich/expresults/qs/tab-prhl}} | {{:Team:ETH_Zurich/expresults/qs/tab-prhl}} | ||
+ | In this set of experiment the promoter pRhl was tested for possible crosstalk. In the top row left graph we see the the induction of pRhl by C4-HSL bound to regulator RhlR. The switching behaviour was observed at a concentration of the inducer molecule of 10<sup>3</sup> nM. | ||
+ | In the case of 3OC12-HSL binding the RhlR regulator and subsequently the promoter pRhl negligible crosstalk has been observed. | ||
+ | Severe crosstalk was detected in the case of 3OC6-HSL binding the RhlR regulator followed by induction of pRhl. The transition occurred at a concentration of the inducer molecule of 10<sup>3</sup> nM but compared to the reference curve a lower (1000 AU) value of fluorescence was observed. The second case of crosstalk with the pRhl was detected with 3OC12-HSL binding to the corresponding LasR regulator followed by inducing the promoter pRhl. There the switching occurred at a concentration 1nM of 3OC12-HSL reaching a fluorescence of 750 AU. This is approximately 0.5 fold the value of the fluorescence shown by the reference curve in green. | ||
====Conclusion of crosstalk experiments==== | ====Conclusion of crosstalk experiments==== | ||
As shown in the graphs in the matrices above, we found and quantitatively characterized all three levels of crosstalk described previously. Unspecific inducer binding to the regulators as well as unspecific binding of the regulator to the promoter occurred in almost all possible combinations. To conclude, we were not able to find an orthogonal quorum sensing pair due to inevitable crosstalk between the systems employing LuxI/LuxR, LasI/LasR, or RhlI/RhlR. | As shown in the graphs in the matrices above, we found and quantitatively characterized all three levels of crosstalk described previously. Unspecific inducer binding to the regulators as well as unspecific binding of the regulator to the promoter occurred in almost all possible combinations. To conclude, we were not able to find an orthogonal quorum sensing pair due to inevitable crosstalk between the systems employing LuxI/LuxR, LasI/LasR, or RhlI/RhlR. |
Revision as of 20:00, 17 October 2014
Quorum Sensing
For our Mosiacoli project, we were looking for molecular systems that allow orthogonal cell-to-cell communication in order to implement connected XOR logic gates. We decided to exploit the quorum sensing systems LuxI/LuxR, LasI/LasR, and RhlI/RhlR in order to achieve the required orthogonal cell-to-cell communication. Even though the corresponding inducer molecules are commercially available and the systems often used, in particular in iGEM projects (e.g. [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_R0062 pLux (BBa_R0062)], '[http://parts.igem.org/Frequently_Used_Parts Top 10 Most used promoters]' with 246 uses), potential crosstalk activity between the different systems may be a severe problem (e. g. Tokyo_Tech 2013, Peking University 2011).
In order to address that challenge, we measured a) a given promoter with its corresponding regulator and a different inducer molecule, b) a given promoter with an unspecific regulator and a particular inducer, c) a given promoter with both regulator and inducer being unspecific, and always included the correct combination of inducer molecule, regulator and promoter as a positive control. This gives in total 27 possible combinations. The output was assessed via sfGFP and measured in terms of fluorescence on microtiter-plate scale.
Summary of experimental results regarding quorum sensing
The following matrices serve as on overview summarizing the results of our experiments to characterize crosstalk on different levels. On the horizontal top row we see the three different inducer molecules (3OC12-HSL, 3OC6-HSL, C4-HSL). On the vertical axis we see the three regulators (LuxR, LasR, RhlR). These matrices aim at giving an overview of the experimental results conducted in relation with quorum sensing and crosstalk. The graph shown in each matrix on the very top left describes the situation where the correct autoinducer molecule has bound the corresponding regulator and this complex has then induced the correct promoter. The solid lines in the graphs show the model data whereas the data points indicated with standard deviation show experimental data.
In this set of experiment the promoter pRhl was tested for possible crosstalk. In the top row left graph we see the the induction of pRhl by C4-HSL bound to regulator RhlR. The switching behaviour was observed at a concentration of the inducer molecule of 103 nM. In the case of 3OC12-HSL binding the RhlR regulator and subsequently the promoter pRhl negligible crosstalk has been observed. Severe crosstalk was detected in the case of 3OC6-HSL binding the RhlR regulator followed by induction of pRhl. The transition occurred at a concentration of the inducer molecule of 103 nM but compared to the reference curve a lower (1000 AU) value of fluorescence was observed. The second case of crosstalk with the pRhl was detected with 3OC12-HSL binding to the corresponding LasR regulator followed by inducing the promoter pRhl. There the switching occurred at a concentration 1nM of 3OC12-HSL reaching a fluorescence of 750 AU. This is approximately 0.5 fold the value of the fluorescence shown by the reference curve in green.
Conclusion of crosstalk experiments
As shown in the graphs in the matrices above, we found and quantitatively characterized all three levels of crosstalk described previously. Unspecific inducer binding to the regulators as well as unspecific binding of the regulator to the promoter occurred in almost all possible combinations. To conclude, we were not able to find an orthogonal quorum sensing pair due to inevitable crosstalk between the systems employing LuxI/LuxR, LasI/LasR, or RhlI/RhlR.