Team:Freiburg/Content/Results/The combination
From 2014.igem.org
Mirja Harms (Talk | contribs) |
Mirja Harms (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<h2 id="Light-induced-receptor">Light induced receptor</h2> | <h2 id="Light-induced-receptor">Light induced receptor</h2> | ||
- | <p>Since our viral vector is specific for the mCAT-1 receptor that is under normal conditions only expressed in murine cells, we | + | <p>Since our viral vector is specific for the mCAT-1 receptor that is under normal conditions only expressed in murine cells, we used this receptor and linked it to the blue light system (p14ls_003) or the red light system (p14rz_002). Non-murine cells that were transfected with this receptor combinations expressed the inducible mCAT-1 after illumination with the specific wave lenghts. Cells expressing the receptor were visible by co-expression of mCherry. To test the functionality of the light induced receptor the cells were infected with our viral vector leading to EGFP expression. Non illuminated cells of the same cell culture containing the same plasmids were not able to express the receptor, thus leading to no infection with our viral vector. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
- | <p class="header">Red light induced receptor.</p> | + | <p class="header">Figure 1: Red light induced receptor in CHO cells.</p> |
<p class="desc">CHO cells were transfected with the red light system (PKM022) and the light induced receptor (p14rz_002). The receptor was labeled with mCherry; (left) after illumination with red light, (middle) incubation in the dark, (right) positive control. Cells were stained with DAPI. <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/Labjournal#MirjaHarms_Confocal_Red_Light">Labjournal</a></p> | <p class="desc">CHO cells were transfected with the red light system (PKM022) and the light induced receptor (p14rz_002). The receptor was labeled with mCherry; (left) after illumination with red light, (middle) incubation in the dark, (right) positive control. Cells were stained with DAPI. <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/Labjournal#MirjaHarms_Confocal_Red_Light">Labjournal</a></p> | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<div class="row category-row"> | <div class="row category-row"> | ||
<div class="col-sm-6"> | <div class="col-sm-6"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>The fluorescence marker mCherry is cleaved from the receptor after its expression, thus remaining in the cytosol when the receptor was transported to the surface of the cell (Fig. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
<figure class="fig-full-width"> | <figure class="fig-full-width"> | ||
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ac/Freiburg2014_Results_light_pos_neg_rez_virus.jpg"> <!-- ORGINAL --> | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ac/Freiburg2014_Results_light_pos_neg_rez_virus.jpg"> <!-- ORGINAL --> | ||
Line 36: | Line 40: | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
- | <p class="header">Blue light induced receptor.</p> | + | <p class="header">Figure 2: Blue light induced receptor in HEK293T.</p> |
<p class="desc">HEK cells were transfected with the blue light system (PKM292 and PKM297) and the light induced receptor (p14ls_003). The receptor was labeled with mCherry. Cells were infected with MuLV EGFP afterwards; (left) incubation in the dark, (middle) after illumination with blue light, (right) cells expressing the light induced receptor were infected with MuLV. <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/Labjournal#MirjaHarms_Controls_Blue_Light">Labjournal</a></p> | <p class="desc">HEK cells were transfected with the blue light system (PKM292 and PKM297) and the light induced receptor (p14ls_003). The receptor was labeled with mCherry. Cells were infected with MuLV EGFP afterwards; (left) incubation in the dark, (middle) after illumination with blue light, (right) cells expressing the light induced receptor were infected with MuLV. <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/Labjournal#MirjaHarms_Controls_Blue_Light">Labjournal</a></p> | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
Line 49: | Line 53: | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
- | <p class="header">Blue light induced receptor in HEK293T</p> | + | <p class="header">Figure 3: Blue light induced receptor in HEK293T</p> |
<p class="desc">HEK cells were transfected with the blue light system (PKM292 and PKM297) and the light induced receptor (p14ls_003). The receptor was labeled with mCherry that was cleaved after expression, thus remaining in the cytoplasm. Cells were infected with MuLV EGFP afterwards; Overlay of all three channels (A); DAPI stained nuclei (B); EGFP expression in infected cells (C); mCherry expression in HEK293T cells since it was cleaved of the mCAT-1; (D) Objective plan apo 60x, 1.4 NA.</p> | <p class="desc">HEK cells were transfected with the blue light system (PKM292 and PKM297) and the light induced receptor (p14ls_003). The receptor was labeled with mCherry that was cleaved after expression, thus remaining in the cytoplasm. Cells were infected with MuLV EGFP afterwards; Overlay of all three channels (A); DAPI stained nuclei (B); EGFP expression in infected cells (C); mCherry expression in HEK293T cells since it was cleaved of the mCAT-1; (D) Objective plan apo 60x, 1.4 NA.</p> | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
Line 68: | Line 72: | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
- | <p class="header">Kinetics of the blue light induced receptor.</p> | + | <p class="header">Figure 4: Kinetics of the blue light induced receptor.</p> |
<p class="desc">HEK cells were transfected with the blue light system (PKM292 and PKM297) and the light induced receptor (p14ls_003, mCherry labeled receptor). Pictures were taken after 12h, 15h, 18h and 24h. <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/Labjournal#MirjaHarms_Blue_Light_Kinetik">Labjournal</a></p> | <p class="desc">HEK cells were transfected with the blue light system (PKM292 and PKM297) and the light induced receptor (p14ls_003, mCherry labeled receptor). Pictures were taken after 12h, 15h, 18h and 24h. <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Notebook/Labjournal#MirjaHarms_Blue_Light_Kinetik">Labjournal</a></p> | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> |
Revision as of 19:31, 17 October 2014
The combination
We, the iGEM Team Freiburg 2014, combined the spatial resolution of the light system with the specificity of our viral vector generating patterns in a homogenous cell culture.
Light induced receptor
Since our viral vector is specific for the mCAT-1 receptor that is under normal conditions only expressed in murine cells, we used this receptor and linked it to the blue light system (p14ls_003) or the red light system (p14rz_002). Non-murine cells that were transfected with this receptor combinations expressed the inducible mCAT-1 after illumination with the specific wave lenghts. Cells expressing the receptor were visible by co-expression of mCherry. To test the functionality of the light induced receptor the cells were infected with our viral vector leading to EGFP expression. Non illuminated cells of the same cell culture containing the same plasmids were not able to express the receptor, thus leading to no infection with our viral vector.
The fluorescence marker mCherry is cleaved from the receptor after its expression, thus remaining in the cytosol when the receptor was transported to the surface of the cell (Fig.
As we know that the transient mCAT-1 receptor that was not linked to a light system needs 24 hours for expression in HEK293 cells, we determined the expression time of the receptor that was induced by blue light after illumination for five hours. We used a receptor that was labeled with both, mCherry and an HA-tag (p14ls_003), for analysis with Western blot and fluorescence microscopy. The results show that the receptor had an expression peak at 24 hours after beginning of illumination.
Pattern Generation
For generating pattern in homogenous cell layers we transfected HEK293T cells with the blue light system and the blue light induced receptor (p14ls_003). Dishes were covered with a photo mask preventing areas in the cell culture from light exposure. However, the blue light system is very sensitive to even low intensities of blue light. Due to scatterd light the receptor was activated in a huge area of the cell culture. Thus patterns were not visible to this time point due to by light scatter activated receptors (Fig.).