Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/catalogue/analysis

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 23: Line 23:
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A0001/main SBa_A0001]</td>
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A0001/main SBa_A0001]</td>
   <td>Trend Modelling</td>
   <td>Trend Modelling</td>
-
   <td>Sheffield 2014</td>
+
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield Sheffield 2014]</td>
   <td></td>
   <td></td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 29: Line 29:
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A0002/main SBa_A0002]</td>
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A0002/main SBa_A0002]</td>
   <td>Graphical Analysis</td>
   <td>Graphical Analysis</td>
-
   <td>Sheffield 2014 </td>
+
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield Sheffield 2014]</td>
   <td></td>
   <td></td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 50: Line 50:
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1001/main SBa_A1001]</td>
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1001/main SBa_A1001]</td>
   <td>Criticial Discourse Analysis </td>
   <td>Criticial Discourse Analysis </td>
-
   <td>Sheffield 2014 </td>
+
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield Sheffield 2014]</td>
   <td></td>
   <td></td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 56: Line 56:
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1002/main SBa_A1002]</td>
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1002/main SBa_A1002]</td>
   <td>Constant Comparison</td>
   <td>Constant Comparison</td>
-
   <td>Sheffield 2014 </td>
+
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield Sheffield 2014]</td>
   <td></td>
   <td></td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 62: Line 62:
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1003/main SBa_A1003]</td>
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1003/main SBa_A1003]</td>
   <td>Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis</td>
   <td>Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis</td>
-
   <td>Sheffield 2014 </td>
+
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield Sheffield 2014]</td>
   <td></td>
   <td></td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 68: Line 68:
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1004/main SBa_A1004]</td>
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield/sociobricks/Part:SBa_A1004/main SBa_A1004]</td>
   <td>Content Analysis</td>
   <td>Content Analysis</td>
-
   <td>Sheffield 2014 </td>
+
   <td>[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Sheffield Sheffield 2014]</td>
   <td></td>
   <td></td>
</tr>
</tr>

Revision as of 17:58, 17 October 2014

Registry of Standard Policy and Practice Parts


Analysis

The bricks presented below show ways in which the data collected from research can be analysed to draw conclusions to support the projects being carried out.

Contents


Quantitative

Quantitative analysis looks for numerical trends in research that can be used to deduce conclusions from research:


Name Description Created by Examples
SBa_A0001 Trend Modelling Sheffield 2014
SBa_A0002 Graphical Analysis Sheffield 2014


Qualitative

Qualitative analysis methods generate an impression of the data but don't provide numerical integrity. Analysis is based on individual's deductions from the data collected through research methods:


Name Description Created by Examples
SBa_A1001 Criticial Discourse Analysis Sheffield 2014
SBa_A1002 Constant Comparison Sheffield 2014
SBa_A1003 Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis Sheffield 2014
SBa_A1004 Content Analysis Sheffield 2014