Team:UESTC-China/Questionnaire.html
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 946: | Line 946: | ||
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c4/QqImage012.png"></div> | <div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c4/QqImage012.png"></div> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | 37% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology | + | 37% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology could be applied in medical science such as synthetic insulin and vaccine. 29% believed that hybrid rice was also one of the application of synthetic biology, and this implied that about 29% people cannot figure out synthetic biology ‘cause hybrid biology was not the application of synthetic biology, and the choice displayed here was just a barricade we made to distinguish the people knew synthetic biology or not. |
<br/></p> | <br/></p> | ||
<div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/eb/QqImage013.png"></div> | <div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/eb/QqImage013.png"></div> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | 34% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology | + | 34% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology could play a role in high yield of rice. 33% believed that it counted a lot in cutting the cost of drugs. 30% held the idea that it did a lot in promoting the environment. And only 3% people did not notice the effect made by synthetic biology. |
<br/></p> | <br/></p> | ||
Revision as of 11:34, 17 October 2014