Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Modelling/erster/test/123

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(content improved)
Line 279: Line 279:
<div id="text">
<div id="text">
<p>
<p>
-
Our modelling results indicated that the concentration of <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/Isobutanol/GeneticalApproach">IlvC</a> is limiting the isobutanol production. An experimentell verification of this hind is the next logical step. This bottleneck could be removed by overexpression of the corresponding coding sequence. One way to achieve this is the integration of a strong promotor and RBS upstream of this coding sequence. Due to a lack of time we were not able to follow up this lead. It could be a great possibility to improve our isobutanol production.
+
Our modelling results indicated that the concentration of two enzymes are limiting the isobutanol production. They are <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/Isobutanol/GeneticalApproach">IlvD</a> and <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/Isobutanol/GeneticalApproach">KivD</a>. An experimentell verification of this effect is the next logical step. This enzymatic bottleneck could be removed by overexpression of the corresponding coding sequences. One way to achieve this is the integration of a strong promotor upstream of theire coding sequences. It could be a possibility to improve our isobutanol production.
 +
As shown in figure
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 17:55, 16 October 2014


Modelling



Abstract

Different modelling approaches were used to identify enzymatic bottlenecks in the isobutanol production pathways and to predict the formation of the desired product in a given time. First of all we created a map of all metabolic reactions which are part of our project (figure 1). This network not only provides a good overview, it also serves as the basic tool for further considerations. Due to the huge amount of components it does not seem feasible to create a computational model for all reactions at once. Therefore we started our modelling work by carrying out a stochiometric analysis. It reveals that 42 electrons are needed for the production of one isobutanol molecule from CO2. As for the isobutanol production pathway, dynamic modeling was carried out, in the course of which bottlenecks could be identified.Finally we prepared the extension of the existing model to predict the effect of specific carbon dioxide fixing reactions.




Introduction

Mathematical modelling is crucial to understand complex biological systems (Schaber et al., 2009). The analysis of isolated biological components hass been supplemented by a systems biology approach in over ten years (Chuang et al., 2010). Mathematical modelling is used to combine biological results (Kherlopian et al., 2008). Modeling is also a way to achieve results without carrying out experiments in a laboratory. The behaviour of a system can be simulated to get results, which cannot be derived from simply looking at the given system (Schaber et al., 2009). The most important aim of any modelling approach is the reduction of complexity. As the given biological reality is often diverse and variable, it is important to identify the major rules and principles, which can describe a system.



Our aims

  • Visualization of the complete meatoblic network
  • Relating electron input to product output
  • Relating electron input to carbon dioxide fixation
  • The identification of bottlenecks in the isobutanol production pathway
  • Prediction of maximal isobutanol production




Stoichiometric analysis

Stoichiometric analysis are useful to get information about the maximal output of a system. In this project the numer of electrons moving into the system limits the amount of product, which could be synhetized in the cells. Therefore the stoichiometric relations of all substances involved in our complex reaction network were calculated (figure 1). The calculation starts with the electrons, which are transportet into the system by mediators. We calculated the resulting production of intracellular molecules based on our map of the metabolic system (figure 1). The results are listed below.




Figure 1: Complete metabolic network of reactions involved in our project.

The theoretical electron costs of different molecules is listed in table 1. All calculations are based on our pathway map. According to our pathway map there are 42 electrons needed for the production of one molecule isobutanol, if CO2 is used as sole carbon source. Our calculation does not involve the house keeping metabolism of E. coli, which consumes lots of energy for the survival of the cell. The true number of consumed electrons per produced isobutanol molecule is therefore much higher. The applied electric power can be converted into a number of electrons by the following equation: 1 A = 1 C * s-1 = 6.2415065 * 1018 electrons.



Table1: This table shows the theoretical electron cost of different intracellular molecules. The electron cost is the number of electrons which are needed for the synthesis of this metabolite. The intermediates are substances which are needed for the production of the final product. There costs are included in the final value for each substance.
Substance Intermediates Number of electrons
FADH2 - 2
NADH+H+ - 2
ATP - 1
Triosephosphate 9 ATP + 6 NADH 21
CO2 fixation - 7
Pyruvate Triosephosphate 19
Isobutanol 2x Pyruvate 42




Dynamic modelling

After the stoichiometric analysis of the system we designed a dynamic model containing kinetic equations for the metabolite concentrations. It allows the identification of metabolic or enzymatic bottlenecks. This is our major aim. We could even use this information in the next step to modify constructs e.g. exchange an RBS or a promotor sequence. This could improve the different enzyme concentrations for upcoming experiments in the laboratory. Furthermore it was our target to predict the production of isobutanol per substrate in a given time. Our model predicts the isobutanol production in a carbon dioxide fixing cell. To achieve our aims we reduced the complex system shown in figure 1 to the version shown in figure 2. This metabolic network was suitable for our dynamic modelling approach.




Figure 2: Reduced metabolic network of reactions which were selected for modelling.


Dynamic modelling of the isobutanol production pathway

The modelling work on the isobutanol pathway is based on publications about the isobutanol production pathway (Atsumi et al., 2008 and Atsumi et al., 2010). We started our work on the isobutanol production pathway by collecting the appropriated kinetic parameters. They were used for the development of a system of differential equations. As for the choice of the kinetics used, we stick to Michaelis-Menten kinetics. This was published as the best approach, if reaction kinetics are not known (Breitling et al., 2008; Chubukov et al., 2014). Additionally kcat and KM values were collected from databases like KEGG, biocyc and BRENDA (table 2). Missing values had to be estimated. The starting concentrations for different metabolites were also taken from the literature and from different databases (table 3).



Table2: This table shows all enzymatic parameters which were used for our dynamic model.
Enzyme kcat KM [mM] Reference
AlsS 121 13.6 Atsumi et al., 2009
IlvC 2.2 0.25 Tyagi et al., 2005
IlvD 10 (estimated) 1.5 Flint et al., 1993
KivD 20 (estimated) 5 (estimated) Werther et al., 2008; Gorcke et al., 2007
AdhA 6.6 9.1 Atsumi et al., 2010




Table3: This table shows all metabolite concentrations which were used for our first model. The metabolite concentration was set to zero, if no published value was available.
Metabolite Concentration [mM] Reference
Pyruvate 10 Yang et al., 2000
2-Acetolactate 0 -
2,3-Dihydroxyisovalerate 0 -
2-Ketoisovalerate 0 -
Isobutyraldehyde 0.6
Isobutanol variable -


We implemented the system of differential equations (figure 3) in matlab (source code) and created first results. The predicted changing of the metabolic concentration over the time is shown in figures 4-7. The amount of expressed proteins could differ depending on the distance of the coding sequence downstream of the promotor. The coding sequences for the involved enzymes are located downstream of a common promotor. Therefore we decided to set the enzyme concentration for the first enzyme to 1 and decrease in steps of 0.1 (source code). These different values were tried to identify appropiate concentrations for each enzyme. The results of this dynamic modelling approach could be transfered to the laboratory by using promotors of different strength.




Figure 3: Differential equations for the dynamic modelling of the isobutanol production.



Figure 4: Predicted changes in metabolic concentration over time.


Figure 5: Predicted changes in metabolic concentration over time. The development in the first minutes is shown by zooming into the figure 4.


Figure 4: Predicted changes in metabolic concentration in an improved system over time. The concentration of IlvD and KivD was increased by factor 3 and 4 respectively.


Figure 7: Predicted changes in metabolic concentration in an improved system over time. The concentration of IlvD and KivD was increased by factor 3 and 4 respectively.


Our modelling results indicated that the concentration of two enzymes are limiting the isobutanol production. They are IlvD and KivD. An experimentell verification of this effect is the next logical step. This enzymatic bottleneck could be removed by overexpression of the corresponding coding sequences. One way to achieve this is the integration of a strong promotor upstream of theire coding sequences. It could be a possibility to improve our isobutanol production. As shown in figure



Carbon dioxide fixing reactions

The next model improvement was the addition of some of the carbon fixing reactions and the pathway leading to pyruvate. We collected kcat and KM values for nearly all relevant steps (table 4). They were used for differential equations which describe these additional reactions.



Table4: This table shows all kcat and KM values of enzymes involved in CO2-fixation and the pathway leading to pyruvate.
Enzyme kcat KM [mM] Reference
PrkA 72.6 0.09 Wadano et al., 1998,Kobayashi et al., 2003
RubisCO 20 (estimated) 0.02 (estimated) Lan and Mott, 1991,Sage, 2002
Pgk 480 1 (estimated) Fifis and Scopes., 1978
GapA - 0.5 Zhao et al., 1995
GpmA 490 (in S.cerevisiae) 0.15 Fraser et al., 1999,White and Fothergil-Gilmore, 1992
Eno 17600 0.1 Spring and Wold, 1972, Albe et al., 1990
PykF 3.2 0.3 (estimated) Oria-Hernandez et al., 2005




Conclusion and summary

We were able to achieve most our aims. The complete metabolic network of our project is visualized in figure 1. Stoichiometric caculations revealed the number of electrons which is in theory need for the production of a desired substance. There are 42 electrons needed for the synthesis of one molecule isobutanol. The fixation of one carbon dioxide molecule would cost 7 electrons. We were able to identify a putative bottleneck in the isobutanol production pathway. This needs to be verified by experiments. The production of isobutanol from pyruvate can be predicted. The next and very important step would be the verification of these prediction by experimental approaches.


References
  • Atsumi, Shota, Taizo Hanai, und James C. Liao. „Non-Fermentative Pathways for Synthesis of Branched-Chain Higher Alcohols as Biofuels“. Nature 451, no. 7174 (2008): 86–89.
  • Atsumi, Shota, Tung-Yun Wu, Eva-Maria Eckl, Sarah D. Hawkins, Thomas Buelter, und James C. Liao. „Engineering the isobutanol biosynthetic pathway in Escherichia coli by comparison of three aldehyde reductase/alcohol dehydrogenase genes“. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 85, no. 3 (2010): 651–57.
  • Yang, Y. T., G. N. Bennett, und K. Y. San. „The Effects of Feed and Intracellular Pyruvate Levels on the Redistribution of Metabolic Fluxes in Escherichia Coli“. Metabolic Engineering 3, no. 2 (2001): 115–23.
  • Wadano, Akira, Keisuke Nishikawa, Tomohiro Hirahashi, Ryohei Satoh, und Toshio Iwaki. „Reaction Mechanism of Phosphoribulokinase from a Cyanobacterium, Synechococcus PCC7942“. Photosynthesis Research 56, no. 1 (1998): 27–33.
  • Kobayashi, Daisuke, Masahiro Tamoi, Toshio Iwaki, Shigeru Shigeoka, und Akira Wadano. „Molecular Characterization and Redox Regulation of Phosphoribulokinase from the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus Sp. PCC 7942“. Plant & Cell Physiology 44, no. 3 (2003): 269–76.
  • Lan, Yun, und Keith A. Mott. „Determination of Apparent Km Values for Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase (Rubisco) Activase Using the Spectrophotometric Assay of Rubisco Activity“. Plant Physiology 95, Nr. 2 (1991): 604–9.
  • Sage, Rowan F. „Variation in the K(cat) of Rubisco in C(3) and C(4) Plants and Some Implications for Photosynthetic Performance at High and Low Temperature“. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, no. 369 (2002): 609–20.
  • Fifis, T., und R. K. Scopes. „Purification of 3-Phosphoglycerate Kinase from Diverse Sources by Affinity Elution Chromatography“. The Biochemical Journal 175, no. 1 (1978): 311–19.
  • Zhao G, Halbur T, Pankratz DC. Colonization of oropharynx and nasal cavity of CDCD pigs by a nontoxigenic strain of Pasteurella multocida type D. J Swine Health Prod 1995;3(3):113-115.
  • Fraser, H. I., M. Kvaratskhelia, und M. F. White. „The Two Analogous Phosphoglycerate Mutases of Escherichia Coli“. FEBS Letters 455, no. 3 (1999): 344–48.
  • White, Malcolm F., und Linda A. Fothergill-Gilmore. „Development of a Mutagenesis, Expression and Purification System for Yeast Phosphoglycerate Mutase“. European Journal of Biochemistry 207, no. 2 (1992): 709–14.
  • Spring, Thomas G., und Finn Wold. „The Purification and Characterization of Escherichia Coli Enolase“. Journal of Biological Chemistry 246, no. 22 (1971): 6797–6802.
  • Albe, Kathy R., Margaret H. Butler, und Barbara E. Wright. „Cellular concentrations of enzymes and their substrates“. Journal of Theoretical Biology 143, no. 2 (1990): 163–95.
  • Oria-Hernández, Jesús, Nallely Cabrera, Ruy Pérez-Montfort, und Leticia Ramírez-Silva. „Pyruvate Kinase Revisited: The Activating Effect of K+“. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, no. 45 (2005): 37924–29.
  • Breitling, Rainer, David Gilbert, Monika Heiner, und Richard Orton. „A Structured Approach for the Engineering of Biochemical Network Models, Illustrated for Signalling Pathways“. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9, no. 5 (2008): 404–21.
  • Chubukov, Victor, Luca Gerosa, Karl Kochanowski, und Uwe Sauer. „Coordination of Microbial Metabolism“. Nature Reviews Microbiology 12, no. 5 (Mai 2014): 327–40.
  • Schaber, J., W. Liebermeister, und E. Klipp. „Nested Uncertainties in Biochemical Models“. IET Systems Biology 3, no. 1 (2009): 1–9.
  • Chuang, Han-Yu, Matan Hofree, und Trey Ideker. „A Decade of Systems Biology“. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 26 (2010): 721–44.
  • Kherlopian, Armen R., Ting Song, Qi Duan, Mathew A. Neimark, Ming J. Po, John K. Gohagan, und Andrew F. Laine. „A Review of Imaging Techniques for Systems Biology“. BMC Systems Biology 2, no. 1 (12. August 2008): 74.
  • Tyagi, R., Lee, Y.-T., Guddat, L.W., and Duggleby, R.G. (2005). Probing the mechanism of the bifunctional enzyme ketol-acid reductoisomerase by site-directed mutagenesis of the active site. FEBS J. 272, 593–602.
  • Atsumi, S., Li, Z., and Liao, J.C. (2009). Acetolactate Synthase from Bacillus subtilis Serves as a 2-Ketoisovalerate Decarboxylase for Isobutanol Biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 6306–6311.
  • Flint, D.H., Emptage, M.H., Finnegan, M.G., Fu, W., and Johnson, M.K. (1993). The role and properties of the iron-sulfur cluster in Escherichia coli dihydroxy-acid dehydratase. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14732–14742.
  • Gocke, D., Nguyen, C.L., Pohl, M., Stillger, T., Walter, L., and Müller, M. (2007). Branched-Chain Keto Acid Decarboxylase from Lactococcus lactis (KdcA), a Valuable Thiamine Diphosphate-Dependent Enzyme for Asymmetric CC Bond Formation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 1425–1435.
  • Werther, T., Spinka, M., Tittmann, K., Schütz, A., Golbik, R., Mrestani-Klaus, C., Hübner, G., and König, S. (2008). Amino Acids Allosterically Regulate the Thiamine Diphosphate-dependent α-Keto Acid Decarboxylase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5344–5354.

Retrieved from "http://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Modelling/erster/test/123"