Team:UC Davis/Electrochemistry Enzyme Tests
From 2014.igem.org
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<div class="mainContainer"> | <div class="mainContainer"> | ||
<div class="mainContainerCenterTopPic"> | <div class="mainContainerCenterTopPic"> | ||
- | <p>This portion of experiment is necessary to determine a maximum and minimum concentration of detecting enzyme activity. Since the necessary detection range for substrate concentration was limited to micromolar range(based on aldehyde concentration on rancid olive oil data), determining the amount of enzyme spiked into the substrate was a key. Our protocol was to mix different | + | <p>This portion of experiment is necessary to determine a maximum and minimum concentration of detecting enzyme activity. Since the necessary detection range for substrate concentration was limited to micromolar range(based on aldehyde concentration on rancid olive oil data), determining the amount of enzyme spiked into the substrate was a key. Our protocol was to mix different concentrations of pentanal substrate with enzyme and to quantify the response with the potentiostat instrument. </p> |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | " | + | <div id="slider"> |
+ | <a href="#" class="control_next">></a> | ||
+ | <a href="#" class="control_prev"><</a> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f4/Pentanalstudyfigure1.png"/></li> | ||
+ | <li><https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/Pentanalstudy2.png" height="400px"/></li> | ||
+ | <div style="position:absolute"><h2>Pentanal Study</h2></div></li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </div><p><br><br> | ||
Graph displays the result of signal our device detected with 1µg / ml E. coli ALDH in each 500, 1000µM pentanal as shown in the figure. | Graph displays the result of signal our device detected with 1µg / ml E. coli ALDH in each 500, 1000µM pentanal as shown in the figure. | ||
Our original protocol expect to continue smaller pentanal concentration as 250µM. However, detection level was smaller than 100nA, which requires our resolution of device to be reset to 10nA - 100nA range. Unfortunately, after changing the resolution, noise level was so large that makes the collected data much less reliable, compared to the higher concentration detection. This experiment has suggested that <br><br> | Our original protocol expect to continue smaller pentanal concentration as 250µM. However, detection level was smaller than 100nA, which requires our resolution of device to be reset to 10nA - 100nA range. Unfortunately, after changing the resolution, noise level was so large that makes the collected data much less reliable, compared to the higher concentration detection. This experiment has suggested that <br><br> |
Revision as of 01:21, 17 October 2014
Electrode Choice
Electrode Choice
System Optimization
System Optimization
Coupling Enzymes
Coupling Enzymes
Overview
Once set up our electrochemical system to be comparable to our home-made detection device, testing our engineered enzymes in our system is the next step. Aldehyde dehydrogenase has been successfully engineered to have specificity in different chain length of aldehyde group or saturity of aldehyde groups. The data that proves these specificity has been collected through plate reader, which is the device measures the enzyme kinetics. However, unlike the plate reader, our system contains more complex and sensitive issue that closely related to electrochemistry. Therefore, planning out experiments that can measure current in our necessity level of detection, which will also be suitable for out system was the first part of enzyme testing; and the second part was to carry out the experimental data which can be comparable to plate reader data.
Enzyme Activity
This portion of experiment is necessary to determine a maximum and minimum concentration of detecting enzyme activity. Since the necessary detection range for substrate concentration was limited to micromolar range(based on aldehyde concentration on rancid olive oil data), determining the amount of enzyme spiked into the substrate was a key. Our protocol was to mix different concentrations of pentanal substrate with enzyme and to quantify the response with the potentiostat instrument.
Graph displays the result of signal our device detected with 1µg / ml E. coli ALDH in each 500, 1000µM pentanal as shown in the figure.
Our original protocol expect to continue smaller pentanal concentration as 250µM. However, detection level was smaller than 100nA, which requires our resolution of device to be reset to 10nA - 100nA range. Unfortunately, after changing the resolution, noise level was so large that makes the collected data much less reliable, compared to the higher concentration detection. This experiment has suggested that
- Necessity for higher enzyme concentration(>>>1µg/ml)
- Electrochemical approach of finding a solution to decrease noise level in the current system
After this conclusion, we have decided to test our enzyme specificity using 10µg/ml enzyme concentration.
Enzyme Specificity
After our engineered proteins have successfully shows distinctive activities on different chain length and saturity of aldehydes in plate reader(device measuring enzyme kinetics), our next goal was to conduct an experiment that proves our electrochemical system can also detect these significant activities on each enzymes and display comparable detection to those data from plate reader.
Our experimental protocol always starts with measuring NADH Standard curve. This step is crucial to find out whether our electrode connection is reliable, and detection of damaged electrode. NADH standard run should be measured after and before each enzyme run to check our system.
Three engineered enzyme has been used to prove detection of enzyme specificity in our homemade device:
- enzyme 1 (referred as E.coli)
- Proved to have higher response in shorter chain aldehyde than longer chain aldehyde
- Significantly lower response in unsaturated aldehyde(all chain length)
- enzyme 2 (referred as Rat)
- Active on all chain length aldehydes, regardless of saturity.
- enzyme 3 (referred as mutant 3)
- Showed significantly higher activity on saturated aldehyde(in all chain length)
In order to show reflect this result in our system, we have chose C5 as the representation of “short length aldehyde”; C10 as “long length aldehyde”; EC10 as “unsaturated aldehyde”
Order of runs:
1) NADH Standard curve 1
2) E. coli with C5, C10, EC10
3) NADH Standard Curve 2
4) Rat enzyme with C5, C10, EC10
5) NADH Standard Curve 3
6) E. coli Mutant 3 with C5, C10, EC10
As a system checkup run for NADH standard curve 1, 2, 3 came out to be very similar. This is an indication of no major problem/change in our system in between the enzyme comparison runs.
"figure (or image slider) comes here"
Enzyme Test Result
"3 figures from plate reader data comes here"
"3 figures from our electrode comes here - using image slider"
" one figure from bar graph comes here"
Conclusion
Figures above shows our experimental data compared to the plate reader data, which has been collected at the same time, using same exact solutions, while we run our experiment on electrode. Data proves the predicted activity on all three engineered enzymes. This can be shown as clear indication of deconvolution of aldehyde concentrations(more than one types of aldehyde) in olive oil using the data from our device.