Team:Cornell/project/wetlab

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 42: Line 42:
<div class="row">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-18">
<div class="col-md-12 col-xs-18">
-
<h1>Results</h1>
+
<h1>Experiments</h1>
-
To assess the efficiency of our system, we used three main methods of determining whether the heavy metals were indeed being sequestered by our bacteria. First, we used a spectrophotometer to analyze the growth rates of E. coli cultures expressing either the vector only, one of the metal transporters, or both a transporter as well as the metallothionein. This test was conducted with the prediction that the bacteria without our constructs would be mildly sensitive to growth in metal-containing media, the bacteria with the transport protein only would be more sensitive to growth in metal-containing media, and the bacteria transformed with both the metal transporter and metallothionein protein would be the least sensitive (and thus grow at the greatest rate) in metal-containing media. . Next, we sampled the supernant of cell cultures that expressed the constructs, and analyzed it for total heavy metal content using the Phen(ylalanine? Phenol? Phenolphthalein?) Green assay[source to company]. Finally, we also submitted that supernatant for analysis at the Cornell Nutrient Analysis lab, in order to obtain specific, quantitative data about the concentration of each heavy metal found in solution.<br>
+
The growth rates of the sequestering strain were measured using spectrophotometry. In addition, two methods were used to determine heavy metal sequestration efficiency. <br><br>
-
-Nutrient Lab results<br>
+
 
-
-Phen Green experiments metals<br>
+
<ol>
-
-Growth assays
+
<li> A spectrophotometer to analyze and compare the kinetic growth rates of E. coli cultures expressing either the metallothionein, transporter proteins, both metallothionein and transporter, and just the vector backbone, as a control. </li>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>We hypothesized that the control culture would be mildly sensitive to growth in metal-containing media, while the cultures with the transport protein would be more sensitive to growth in metal-containing media due to increased access of the heavy metal to cellular machinery. Finally, bacteria transformed with both the metal transporter and metallothionein protein would be the least sensitive in metal-containing media. Each strain was grown in different heavy metal concentrations. </li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<li>Sequestration efficiency was measured by growing both, the wild type strains as well as sequestering strains in heavy metals of different concentrations. The concentration of heavy metals after growth was measured in two ways: </li>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li> Nutrient Analysis Lab at Cornell University</li>
 +
<li> Using green-fluorescent heavy metal indicator Phen Green</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</ol>
<br><br>
<br><br>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 01:33, 16 October 2014

Cornell iGEM

web stats

Wet Lab



Idea

Mercury, nickel, and lead were targeted for sequestration by our strain of bacteria by utilizing the efficient binding properties of the pea metallothionein and specificity of the respective metal transport proteins, merT/merP1, nixA2,and CBP4. First, the yeast metallothionein3 as well as each of the three heavy metal transport proteins were biobricked. Then, our wetlab sub team combined the parts to develop functional composite constructs. The idea of utilizing of metallothioneins in parallel with metal transporters for sequestration has been studied in depth for mercury and nickel. However, this idea has never been investigated for lead primarily due to a lack of characterization of the lead transporter.

To test the sequestration efficiency of each metal, E.coli BL21-A1 was transformed with the pea metallothionein as well the respective metal transporter for the targeted metal. The sequestering strains can be placed into fiber reactors to develop functional sequestering filters (see drylab).

...

Components

...

Experiments

The growth rates of the sequestering strain were measured using spectrophotometry. In addition, two methods were used to determine heavy metal sequestration efficiency.

  1. A spectrophotometer to analyze and compare the kinetic growth rates of E. coli cultures expressing either the metallothionein, transporter proteins, both metallothionein and transporter, and just the vector backbone, as a control.
    • We hypothesized that the control culture would be mildly sensitive to growth in metal-containing media, while the cultures with the transport protein would be more sensitive to growth in metal-containing media due to increased access of the heavy metal to cellular machinery. Finally, bacteria transformed with both the metal transporter and metallothionein protein would be the least sensitive in metal-containing media. Each strain was grown in different heavy metal concentrations.
  2. Sequestration efficiency was measured by growing both, the wild type strains as well as sequestering strains in heavy metals of different concentrations. The concentration of heavy metals after growth was measured in two ways:
    • Nutrient Analysis Lab at Cornell University
    • Using green-fluorescent heavy metal indicator Phen Green


...

Image caption

More detail. Stuff stuff stuff stuff.

Button Button

...

Image caption

More detail. Stuff stuff stuff stuff.

Button Button

...

Image caption

More detail. Stuff stuff stuff stuff.

Button Button

References


  1. Ref 1
  2. Ref 2
  3. Ref 3