Team:Aachen/OD/F device
From 2014.igem.org
(→Achievements) |
|||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
Commercially available equipment uses lasers and a set of two fine filters, one between laser and sample and one between sample and sensor. To beat down the price, our OD/F Device uses a simpler measuring principle: It has just one rather low-quality filter, between sample and sensor, and illuminates with an LED instead of a laser. However, the LED is not as accurate as a laser and has a non-optimal spectrum. On top of that, due to the missing filter between laser and sample, stray light might influence the measurement. Nevertheless, one main goal was to produce an inexpensive device. Given that we therefore had to compromise some of the measurement quality, were we still able to produce stable, precise and good data? | Commercially available equipment uses lasers and a set of two fine filters, one between laser and sample and one between sample and sensor. To beat down the price, our OD/F Device uses a simpler measuring principle: It has just one rather low-quality filter, between sample and sensor, and illuminates with an LED instead of a laser. However, the LED is not as accurate as a laser and has a non-optimal spectrum. On top of that, due to the missing filter between laser and sample, stray light might influence the measurement. Nevertheless, one main goal was to produce an inexpensive device. Given that we therefore had to compromise some of the measurement quality, were we still able to produce stable, precise and good data? | ||
- | The answer is: Yes! With the optimal design of our cuvette holder we achieved good-quality results albeit using the cheap filter. | + | The answer is: Yes! With the optimal design of our cuvette holder we '''achieved good-quality results''' albeit using the cheap filter. |
[graphs showing the awesomeness of our OD/F device] | [graphs showing the awesomeness of our OD/F device] | ||
- | On top of that, we also achieved all other goals we set in the beginning: The device makes do with one button, the blank button, only and is thus really straightforward to use. With a cost of just [https://2014.igem.org/Team:Aachen/PolicyPractices/Economics#economicsodf 60$], the OD/F beats any commercially available system by far. Due to the use of plexiglass and the compact design, one unit | + | On top of that, we also achieved all other goals we set in the beginning: The device makes do with '''one button''', the blank button, only and is thus really straightforward to use. With a '''cost of just [https://2014.igem.org/Team:Aachen/PolicyPractices/Economics#economicsodf 60$]''', the OD/F beats any commercially available system by far. Due to the use of light plexiglass for the casing and the compact design, one unit '''weighs less than 500 g''' and can be easily connected to any power adapter via USB. We also managed to build the device with common, inexpensive and easily available parts, and '''[https://2014.igem.org/Team:Aachen/Notebook/Engineering/ODF#diy published] all technical details and a construction manual on our wiki'''. At least, though we actually built two separate devices for OD and fluorescence measurement, both work really well and putting the two units into one case would just require to laser cut a new top. |
{{Team:Aachen/Footer}} | {{Team:Aachen/Footer}} |
Revision as of 19:50, 15 October 2014
|
|
|
|