Team:UESTC-China/Questionnaire.html
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 384: | Line 384: | ||
- | #SensorEditingArea{position:absolute; left:0px; top:280px; height: | + | #SensorEditingArea{position:absolute; left:0px; top:280px; height:27300px; width:1183px; background-color:#ffffff; padding:60px 0px 0px 30px;} |
.SensorEditingAreaClass p{color:#1b1b1b;position:relative;left:0px; width:1140px; font-size:23px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; text-align:justify;} | .SensorEditingAreaClass p{color:#1b1b1b;position:relative;left:0px; width:1140px; font-size:23px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; text-align:justify;} | ||
Line 946: | Line 946: | ||
<br/></p> | <br/></p> | ||
+ | <div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/QqImage014.png"></div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | 34% people believed that synthetic biology or genetic biology can play a role in high yield of rice.33% believed that it counts a lot in cutting the cost of drugs. 30% held the idea that it did a lot in promoting the environment. And only 3% people did not notice the effect made by synthetic biology. | ||
+ | <br/></p> | ||
+ | <div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c5/QqImage015.png"></div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | About 39% people cared the biosafety of the plant made by synthetic biology, and about 29% paid attention to the efficiency of absorbing formaldehyde. | ||
+ | <br/></p> | ||
+ | <div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/38/QqImage016.png"></div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | About 94% (77% plus 17%) people were in favor of our project in synthesizing a plant absorbing formaldehyde largely. Only about 4% people held the idea that they cared little about this project for the project had no business with them and 2% people did not back our project due to the potential hazard of synthetic biology. | ||
+ | <br/></p> | ||
+ | <div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Image017.png"></div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | When buying the products to absorb formaldehyde, people cared more about biosafety (47%) and the efficiency (32%). About 17% people cared about the price and 4% cared about the portability of the product. | ||
+ | <br/></p> | ||
- | + | <div align="center" class="analysis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2d/QqImage018.png"></div> | |
- | + | <p> | |
+ | When buying the products of absorbing formaldehyde, people prefer to supermarket (58%) and online shopping (26%) than roadside market or stalls. | ||
+ | <br/></p> | ||
Revision as of 11:56, 14 October 2014