Team:Aachen/PolicyPractices

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Spreading the Idea of Synthetic Biology)
Line 7: Line 7:
During the course of the past summer, we not only refined the technical and biological side of ''Cellock Holmes'' but also considered other aspects of our iGEM project such as '''social acceptance''', '''biosafety''' and '''economical relevance'''.   
During the course of the past summer, we not only refined the technical and biological side of ''Cellock Holmes'' but also considered other aspects of our iGEM project such as '''social acceptance''', '''biosafety''' and '''economical relevance'''.   
 +
 +
 +
{{Team:Aachen/BlockSeparator}}
== Spreading the Idea of Synthetic Biology ==
== Spreading the Idea of Synthetic Biology ==
Line 73: Line 76:
</ul></html>
</ul></html>
 +
{{Team:Aachen/BlockSeparator}}
 +
 +
== Biosafety ==
 +
 +
Our iGEM team is committed to consider all aspects of the entire project, including biosafety. From the beginning on, the team thoroughly discussed safety issues that could potentially arise with the implementation of ''Cellock Holmes''. The results of these discussions fundamentally influenced the design of ''Watson''
{{Team:Aachen/Footer}}
{{Team:Aachen/Footer}}

Revision as of 14:05, 10 October 2014

Policy & Practices

During the course of the past summer, we not only refined the technical and biological side of Cellock Holmes but also considered other aspects of our iGEM project such as social acceptance, biosafety and economical relevance.


Spreading the Idea of Synthetic Biology

Unfortunately, a lot people around the world are scared of genetically modified organisms and any application related to them. Though we believe that a bit of natural skepticism towards new and unproved technologies is not just good but especially desirable, the current fear of Frankenstein organisms escaping from laboratories might be disproportionate and counterproductive to technological and scientific advancement in related fields.

However, as reported, for example, in an [http://www.rundschau-online.de/magazin/gentechnik--risiko-oder-chance-,15184902,15929266.html article] published in a local newspaper's magazine, Kölnische Rundschau, the social acceptance of biotechnological products would be higher if people felt informed better. Following up on this, we thought about how we can inform people factually but in a comprehensible way about gene technology and synthetic biology.

At the same time, young students interested in science and engineering are the most valuable future source of innovation. One day, they might be the researchers who develop the solutions to the most pressing issues of our world.

Combining these two thoughts, we visited two schools, the Kaiser-Karls-Gymnasium in Aachen and the NEAnderLab in Hilden, where we talked to students about synthetic biology and the iGEM competition, but also explained the scientific background and social aspects of our project. A delegation of our team also visited the MakerFaire in Hannover, a family-friendly exhibition for tinkerers of all kinds, to spread the idea of synthetic biology and to discuss our project with the public. When we organized the Aachen iGEM Meetup 2014, we also made sure to include a public part where all teams who participated in our meetup had the opportunity to present their project to a general audience.

To read more about our different public projects, please click on the respective logo below.

Biosafety

Our iGEM team is committed to consider all aspects of the entire project, including biosafety. From the beginning on, the team thoroughly discussed safety issues that could potentially arise with the implementation of Cellock Holmes. The results of these discussions fundamentally influenced the design of Watson

Contact Disclaimer

Retrieved from "http://2014.igem.org/Team:Aachen/PolicyPractices"