Team:Aachen/Errorlog

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 24: Line 24:
<!--====================================================================-->
<!--====================================================================-->
<!--==================== TEXT STARTS HERE ==============================-->
<!--==================== TEXT STARTS HERE ==============================-->
-
<h1>
+
 
-
The software Measurarty
+
<h1>Device and Software</h1>
-
</h1>
+
 
-
<p>
+
The soft- and hardware aspects of our project are described in the <i>Error Log</i>, because we all learn from errors we made.
-
The third part of our project is our software Measurarty. The software will allow us to analyze the fluorescence emitted by our sensor cells in a more advanced and better way than just using a simple Treshold. We will utilize a modern segmentation algorithm in combination with further, detailed image processing algorithms.
+
-
</p>  
+
-
<p>
+
-
More information will be available soon!
+
-
</p>
+
<!--===================== TEXT ENDS HERE ===============================-->
<!--===================== TEXT ENDS HERE ===============================-->
Line 66: Line 61:
<!--==================== TEXT STARTS HERE ==============================-->
<!--==================== TEXT STARTS HERE ==============================-->
-
$$MathJax 2+2 \frac{1}{2}$$ works. <br>
+
<h1>
 +
The Software: Measurarty
 +
</h1>
 +
<p>
 +
The third part of our project is our software Measurarty. The software will allow us to analyze the fluorescence emitted by our sensor cells in a more advanced and better way than just using a simple Treshold. We will utilize a modern segmentation algorithm in combination with further, detailed image processing algorithms.
 +
</p>
 +
<p>
 +
More information will be available soon, as soon as we can describe the theoretical foundations of the software in detail. But therefore we'd love to use formula that need to be displayed properly using the <math>-tag :-)
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
While MathJax seems to work $$2+2 \cdot \frac{1}{2}$$, <br>
 +
the math-tag </html><math>2 \cdot \frac{1}{2}</math><html> does not ...
-
but the math-tag </html><math>2 \cdot \frac{1}{2}</math><html> ?
+
</p>
<!--===================== TEXT ENDS HERE ===============================-->
<!--===================== TEXT ENDS HERE ===============================-->
Line 102: Line 108:
<!--==================== TEXT STARTS HERE ==============================-->
<!--==================== TEXT STARTS HERE ==============================-->
 +
<h1>The Device: Cellock Holmes</h1>
 +
 +
You may wonder: again Cellock Holmes?! YES! <br>
 +
In lack of a better name, our name for the device is Cellock Holmes, again.
<!--===================== TEXT ENDS HERE ===============================-->
<!--===================== TEXT ENDS HERE ===============================-->

Revision as of 16:29, 7 June 2014

Device and Software

The soft- and hardware aspects of our project are described in the Error Log, because we all learn from errors we made.

The Software: Measurarty

The third part of our project is our software Measurarty. The software will allow us to analyze the fluorescence emitted by our sensor cells in a more advanced and better way than just using a simple Treshold. We will utilize a modern segmentation algorithm in combination with further, detailed image processing algorithms.

More information will be available soon, as soon as we can describe the theoretical foundations of the software in detail. But therefore we'd love to use formula that need to be displayed properly using the -tag :-)

While MathJax seems to work $$2+2 \cdot \frac{1}{2}$$,
the math-tag <math>2 \cdot \frac{1}{2}</math> does not ...

The Device: Cellock Holmes

You may wonder: again Cellock Holmes?! YES!
In lack of a better name, our name for the device is Cellock Holmes, again.