Team:IIT Delhi/Parts
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center>✔ Biobrick 3: <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1395003" > Part:BBa_K1395003 sqr gene (sulfide quinone reductase) under constitutive promoter </a> ✔</center> | <center>✔ Biobrick 3: <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1395003" > Part:BBa_K1395003 sqr gene (sulfide quinone reductase) under constitutive promoter </a> ✔</center> | ||
- | <div class="vector"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/da/Igemiitd_S0x_clone_Final_photo.jpg"/></div> | + | <div class="vector"> |
+ | <img class="normalpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/da/Igemiitd_S0x_clone_Final_photo.jpg"/> | ||
+ | <img class="biggerpic" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2d/SOx_Final_Clone_Map_copy.png"/> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<li>This part is composite biobrick having parts of biobricks Bba_K896000 and Bba_K896001. The first part is sqr gene obtained from biobrick Bba_K896000. In this part the gene is expressed under a constitutive promoter and this enzyme converts the sulphide (S-2 ) to elemental Sulfur. And the second part is cysI gene obtained from Bba_K896001 which converts sulphite(SO32-) to sulphide (S-2 ) . So, these two parts codes for proteins which simultaneously work to convert sulphite (SO32-)to elemental Sulfur.</li> | <li>This part is composite biobrick having parts of biobricks Bba_K896000 and Bba_K896001. The first part is sqr gene obtained from biobrick Bba_K896000. In this part the gene is expressed under a constitutive promoter and this enzyme converts the sulphide (S-2 ) to elemental Sulfur. And the second part is cysI gene obtained from Bba_K896001 which converts sulphite(SO32-) to sulphide (S-2 ) . So, these two parts codes for proteins which simultaneously work to convert sulphite (SO32-)to elemental Sulfur.</li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center>Testing of Biobricks</center> | ||
+ | <br>Expression of protein: | ||
+ | The plasmids of positive clones were digested by EcoR1 and Pst1I to check the release of insert and clones were confirmed. The positive clone was sequenced by Chromus Biotech and sequence was confirmed by Clustal W sequence alignment program. The E. coli cells containing our clones were grown in LB medium supplemented with 34 µg mL-1 chloramphenicol as selective agent at 37ºC till OD600 reaches 1.0. The expression of proteins was checked on SDS-PAGE.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center>Activity Assay of nrfA:</center> | ||
+ | <br>For activity assay cells were sonicated for 10 minutes at 50 amplitude with 5 second pulse on and 5 second pulse off. After this the cells were centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4C to separate the cell lysate. In activity assay 50mM Sodium Phosphate Buffer (pH – 7.2), 2mM KCN, 0.16mM DCPIP, 10mM tyramine was used to test the activity of enzyme. | ||
+ | DCPIP used as a redox dye. Oxidized, DCPIP is blue with a maximal absorption at 600 nm; when reduced, DCPIP is colorless. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <div class="vector"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a9/Igem-iitd-reaction.png"/><br> | ||
+ | <div class="vector"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c9/Igem-iitd-reaction-2.JPG"/><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | From these readings it was clear that enzyme activity is present in both negative control and nox clone. We got slightly lower readings for nox clone but not as high as expected. This might be due to the improper sonication of the cells. Because of this maybe the whole protein goes in the pellet after centrifuging the sonicated fraction. Hence, We are working on the optimization of sonication. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="gel"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/32/Igem-iitd-parts-testing-gel-run.jpg"/></div><br> | ||
+ | Above figure shows the bands of 53.7 kDa and 46.3 kDa were observed for the nitrite reductase and sulphide-quinone reductase respectively.<br> | ||
+ | <div class="gel"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/01/Igem-iitd-parts-testing-gel-run-2.jpg"/></div><br> | ||
+ | Fig. The bands of 62 kDa and 46.3 kDa were observed for the sulfur reductase and sulphide-quinone reductase respectively. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 173: | Line 207: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | <div class="copyright"><p>Copyright © iGEM-IIT Delhi 2014 | Developer: ABHISHEK BHARTI & SHASHANK YADAV </p></div> | + | <div class="copyright"><p>Copyright © iGEM-IIT Delhi 2014 | Developer: ABHISHEK BHARTI & SHASHANK YADAV </p> |
+ | <center>"We won a Bronze Medal at the iGEM Giant Jamboree 2014"</center></div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 10:50, 30 November 2014
Expression of protein: The plasmids of positive clones were digested by EcoR1 and Pst1I to check the release of insert and clones were confirmed. The positive clone was sequenced by Chromus Biotech and sequence was confirmed by Clustal W sequence alignment program. The E. coli cells containing our clones were grown in LB medium supplemented with 34 µg mL-1 chloramphenicol as selective agent at 37ºC till OD600 reaches 1.0. The expression of proteins was checked on SDS-PAGE.
For activity assay cells were sonicated for 10 minutes at 50 amplitude with 5 second pulse on and 5 second pulse off. After this the cells were centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4C to separate the cell lysate. In activity assay 50mM Sodium Phosphate Buffer (pH – 7.2), 2mM KCN, 0.16mM DCPIP, 10mM tyramine was used to test the activity of enzyme. DCPIP used as a redox dye. Oxidized, DCPIP is blue with a maximal absorption at 600 nm; when reduced, DCPIP is colorless.
From these readings it was clear that enzyme activity is present in both negative control and nox clone. We got slightly lower readings for nox clone but not as high as expected. This might be due to the improper sonication of the cells. Because of this maybe the whole protein goes in the pellet after centrifuging the sonicated fraction. Hence, We are working on the optimization of sonication.
Above figure shows the bands of 53.7 kDa and 46.3 kDa were observed for the nitrite reductase and sulphide-quinone reductase respectively.
Fig. The bands of 62 kDa and 46.3 kDa were observed for the sulfur reductase and sulphide-quinone reductase respectively.