|
|
(5 intermediate revisions not shown) |
Line 62: |
Line 62: |
| </ul> | | </ul> |
| </nav> | | </nav> |
- | <aside style="height: 1100px;"></aside> | + | <aside style="height: 1350px;"></aside> |
| <!-- end .sidebar1 --></div> | | <!-- end .sidebar1 --></div> |
| | | |
Line 73: |
Line 73: |
| <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/22/Tsinghua_Icon_Project_Virus.gif" class="fltrt" style="margin-right: 30px; border-radius: 10px;" width="250" /> | | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/22/Tsinghua_Icon_Project_Virus.gif" class="fltrt" style="margin-right: 30px; border-radius: 10px;" width="250" /> |
| | | |
- | <p>Gene therapy requires introduction of therapeutic DNA into a patient's somatic cells, typically achieved with a viral vector, such as the adeno-virus. For many years medical researchers have been struggling to optimize existing transfection systems to eliminate the risk of random insertions, carcinogenicity, and severe immune responses. Recently, the Adeno-associated virus (AAV) has matured as a gene therapy agent and has won favor for its safety efficiency. In fact, the first gene therapy drug (approved outside China) was </p> | + | <p>Gene therapy requires introduction of therapeutic DNA into a patient's somatic cells, typically achieved with a viral vector. For many years medical researchers have been struggling to optimize existing transfection systems to eliminate the risk of random insertions, carcinogenicity, and severe immune responses. Recently, the Adeno-associated virus (AAV) has matured as a gene therapy agent and has won favor for its safety efficiency. In fact, the first gene therapy drug (approved outside China) was </p> |
- | <p>We choose <i><b> adeno-associated virus </b></i> as platform to construct plasmids, which could just insert into 19 chromosome. Then we designed the following experiments to prove it safe and practicable .</p> | + | <p>We chose the <i><b> adeno-associated virus (AAV)</b></i> as a platform to transfer therapeutic genes into human cells. AAV is known for its safety as a viral vector for the following reasons: </p> |
- | <p>1. Add NotI cleavage sites on the both ends of mCherry gene. (the AAV vector we bought has NotI cleavage sites )</br>
| + | <ul> |
- | 2. Insert mCherry gene into the AAV vector by restriction endonuclease NotI. Then we got the recombinant vector mCherry-AAV.</br>
| + | <li>A single-copy insertion is made at a specific site within an intron on human Chromosome 19. Chance of random-insertion mediated mutagenesis is extremely low.</li> |
- | 3. Transfect the <i><b> mCherry-AAV </b></i> into 293T cell line through calcium phosphate-based method. During this step the plasmids, pAAV-RC and pHelper, which express the shell of AAV are needed. (this kind of method that divide the virus into more than one expressing plasmids makes AAV safe)</br>
| + | <li>AAV infection does not cause severe immune responses as do other vectors such as the adenoviral vector or lentiviral vector. Therefore minimizing the risk of severe complications.</li> |
- | 4. Collect the virus through dry ice-ethanol bath and water bath in 37℃, and then add the virus into the 293T cell line.</br>
| + | </ul> |
- | 5. After 48h, we can track the AAV in 293T cell lines by detecting the fluorescence of mCherry.
| + | |
- | The results are as follows:
| + | <h2>Constructing and Characterizing the AAV Platform</h2> |
- | </br> | + | <p>An AAV platform was set up (with commercially purchased plasmids) in a BSL2 lab with special care. We included an mCherry fluorescent protein encoding gene into the AAV construct to assess transfection efficiency in HEK 293 cells. The full experiment procedures are listed as follows.</p> |
- | </p>
| + | <ol type="1"> |
| + | <li>Add NotI cleavage sites on the both ends of mCherry gene. (the AAV vector we bought has NotI cleavage sites )</li> |
| + | <li>Insert mCherry gene into the AAV vector by restriction endonuclease NotI. Then we got the recombinant vector mCherry-AAV.</li> |
| + | <li>Transfect the <i><b> mCherry-AAV </b></i> into 293T cell line through calcium phosphate-based method. During this step the plasmids, pAAV-RC and pHelper, which express the shell of AAV are needed. (this kind of method that divide the virus into more than one expressing plasmids makes AAV safe)</li> |
| + | <li>Collect the virus through dry ice-ethanol bath and water bath in 37℃, and then add the virus into the 293T cell line.</li> |
| + | <li>After 48h, we can track the AAV in 293T cell lines by detecting the fluorescence of mCherry. </li> |
| + | </ol> |
| + | |
| <table align="center"><tr><td align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7a/2014_thu_aav_fig1.jpg" width="350" height="280"></br><span style="font-size:10px">Figure1. 293T cell under mcherry fluorescence</span></td><td align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/52/2014_thu_aav_fig2.jpg" width="350" height="280"></br><span style="font-size:10px">Figure2. 293T cell under whitefield</span></td></tr></table> | | <table align="center"><tr><td align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7a/2014_thu_aav_fig1.jpg" width="350" height="280"></br><span style="font-size:10px">Figure1. 293T cell under mcherry fluorescence</span></td><td align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/52/2014_thu_aav_fig2.jpg" width="350" height="280"></br><span style="font-size:10px">Figure2. 293T cell under whitefield</span></td></tr></table> |
| <div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/63/2014_thu_aav_fig3.png" width="350" height="350"></br><span style="font-size:10px" >Figure3. 293T cell after merge</span></div> | | <div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/63/2014_thu_aav_fig3.png" width="350" height="350"></br><span style="font-size:10px" >Figure3. 293T cell after merge</span></div> |
- | <p>We can see from the figure that recombinant mcherry-AAV vectors express in the 293T cell successfully, which prove that the AAV system is practicable.</br> | + | <p>A stable but relatively low transfection rate for the AAV vector was observed in most transfection attempts. In the AAV production phase, more than 80% of cells are involved, however, due to low virus concentrations and low transfection rates, we were only able to achieve 1% AAV infection rate in most of our attempts. However, these issues can be compensated by either increasing the viral dosage, or by using alternative cell lines more suitable to AAV production.</p> |
- | However, the system is not exactly perfect. Although when 293T cells are producing virus we can detect 70%-80% positive rate, after virus infect the 293T cells, less than 1% positive rate can be observed.
| + | <p>In order to confirm that AAV vectors only convey a single-copy insertion, mCherry-positive cells (indicating successful AAV infection) will be amplified via cell sorting, and then subjected to qPCR analysis to assess the relative amount of foreign genes introduced to the cellular genome.</p> |
- | | + | |
- | Another condition can’t be ignored that we use 293T as the virus-producing platform, but in fact, there are various 293 cell lines, such as 293F, 293A and etc. Therefore, 293T cell lines may not be the best cell line to produce the AAV virus.</br>
| + | |
- |
| + | |
- | Then we sort the 293T cells which have mcherry fluorescence, and after incubate the cell as many as enough, we can test the expression of mcherry on the mRNA level by qPCR.</p>
| + | |
| <p style="text-align: right;">Return to: <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Tsinghua/Project">Project</a></p> | | <p style="text-align: right;">Return to: <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Tsinghua/Project">Project</a></p> |
| <!-- end .content --></article> | | <!-- end .content --></article> |
Project: The Virus
Return to: Project
The AAV Gene Therapy Platform
Gene therapy requires introduction of therapeutic DNA into a patient's somatic cells, typically achieved with a viral vector. For many years medical researchers have been struggling to optimize existing transfection systems to eliminate the risk of random insertions, carcinogenicity, and severe immune responses. Recently, the Adeno-associated virus (AAV) has matured as a gene therapy agent and has won favor for its safety efficiency. In fact, the first gene therapy drug (approved outside China) was
We chose the adeno-associated virus (AAV) as a platform to transfer therapeutic genes into human cells. AAV is known for its safety as a viral vector for the following reasons:
- A single-copy insertion is made at a specific site within an intron on human Chromosome 19. Chance of random-insertion mediated mutagenesis is extremely low.
- AAV infection does not cause severe immune responses as do other vectors such as the adenoviral vector or lentiviral vector. Therefore minimizing the risk of severe complications.
Constructing and Characterizing the AAV Platform
An AAV platform was set up (with commercially purchased plasmids) in a BSL2 lab with special care. We included an mCherry fluorescent protein encoding gene into the AAV construct to assess transfection efficiency in HEK 293 cells. The full experiment procedures are listed as follows.
- Add NotI cleavage sites on the both ends of mCherry gene. (the AAV vector we bought has NotI cleavage sites )
- Insert mCherry gene into the AAV vector by restriction endonuclease NotI. Then we got the recombinant vector mCherry-AAV.
- Transfect the mCherry-AAV into 293T cell line through calcium phosphate-based method. During this step the plasmids, pAAV-RC and pHelper, which express the shell of AAV are needed. (this kind of method that divide the virus into more than one expressing plasmids makes AAV safe)
- Collect the virus through dry ice-ethanol bath and water bath in 37℃, and then add the virus into the 293T cell line.
- After 48h, we can track the AAV in 293T cell lines by detecting the fluorescence of mCherry.
Figure1. 293T cell under mcherry fluorescence | Figure2. 293T cell under whitefield |
Figure3. 293T cell after merge
A stable but relatively low transfection rate for the AAV vector was observed in most transfection attempts. In the AAV production phase, more than 80% of cells are involved, however, due to low virus concentrations and low transfection rates, we were only able to achieve 1% AAV infection rate in most of our attempts. However, these issues can be compensated by either increasing the viral dosage, or by using alternative cell lines more suitable to AAV production.
In order to confirm that AAV vectors only convey a single-copy insertion, mCherry-positive cells (indicating successful AAV infection) will be amplified via cell sorting, and then subjected to qPCR analysis to assess the relative amount of foreign genes introduced to the cellular genome.
Return to: Project