Team:Aachen/Collaborations/Neanderlab
From 2014.igem.org
(→School Project at the NEAnderLab) |
AZimmermann (Talk | contribs) m (→School Project at the NEAnderLab) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
As a part of our '''initiative to spark interest for (synthetic) biology and DIY hardware''' in the young generation, we cooperated with the high school ''Gymnasium am Neandertal'' to bring a grade 11 biology standard level class into the lab. | As a part of our '''initiative to spark interest for (synthetic) biology and DIY hardware''' in the young generation, we cooperated with the high school ''Gymnasium am Neandertal'' to bring a grade 11 biology standard level class into the lab. | ||
- | Overall, this event was '''a great success'''! We | + | Overall, this event was '''a great success'''! We got really good positive feedback from both students and instructors, and the project even made it into a local newspaper. ''Rheinische Post'' reported about the collaboration between our iGEM team and the NEAnderLab in the article [http://www.genios.de/presse-archiv/artikel/RP/20140924/schueler-forschen-mit-studenten-im-/20140924015746000040077524.html "Schüler forschen mit Studenten im Neanderlab"] ("High school students do research with university students in the Neanderlab") on September 24th, 2014. |
{{Team:Aachen/Test/GalleryHeader}} | {{Team:Aachen/Test/GalleryHeader}} | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
At the end of the day, we also answered the students' questions about synthetic biology and the Biology/Biotechnology university programs. As a souvenir, each student got to keep a phosphorescing stone. | At the end of the day, we also answered the students' questions about synthetic biology and the Biology/Biotechnology university programs. As a souvenir, each student got to keep a phosphorescing stone. | ||
- | |||
===Evaluation=== | ===Evaluation=== | ||
+ | <span class="anchor" id="neanderlabevaluation"></span> | ||
The students were also asked to fill out an evaluation sheet. The '''reception of the program was good''', especially when considering that the class consisted of mostly students that chose biology because they are required to select one of either chemistry, physics or biology and thought that biology was the easiest one and that there would be no math involved (haha!). The results of the evaluation were good, and are shown below. | The students were also asked to fill out an evaluation sheet. The '''reception of the program was good''', especially when considering that the class consisted of mostly students that chose biology because they are required to select one of either chemistry, physics or biology and thought that biology was the easiest one and that there would be no math involved (haha!). The results of the evaluation were good, and are shown below. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:10, 17 October 2014
|