Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Challenges
From 2014.igem.org
(Created page with "{{Template:Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/igem.css}} {{Template:Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/main.css}} {{Template:Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Banner_team.css}} {{Template:Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Ba...") |
(part3) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
- | <h1> Biosafety </h1> | + | <h1>Biosafety - Antibiotic-free Selection</h1> |
<!-- Button begin --> | <!-- Button begin --> | ||
- | <div id="main_menue" style="margin-left: | + | <div id="main_menue" style="margin-left:65px; height:80px"> |
<a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety"style="color:#000000"> | <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety"style="color:#000000"> | ||
<div class="main_menueButton"> | <div class="main_menueButton"> | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
<a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Long-termStability"style="color:#000000"> | <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Long-termStability"style="color:#000000"> | ||
Line 51: | Line 46: | ||
<a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Challenges"style="color:#000000"> | <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Challenges"style="color:#000000"> | ||
- | <div class=" | + | <div class="main_menueButtonActual" style="width:100px"> |
<p class="buttoncenter"><font color="#FFFFFF">Challenges</font></p> | <p class="buttoncenter"><font color="#FFFFFF">Challenges</font></p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 58: | Line 53: | ||
<a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Outlook"style="color:#000000"> | <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Outlook"style="color:#000000"> | ||
- | <div class=" | + | <div class="main_menueButton" style="width:100px"> |
<p class="buttoncenter"><font color="#FFFFFF">Outlook</font></p> | <p class="buttoncenter"><font color="#FFFFFF">Outlook</font></p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 72: | Line 67: | ||
<h6>Remaining Challenges</h6> | <h6>Remaining Challenges</h6> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | The <i>E. coli</i> strains KRX <i>Δalr</i> <i>ΔdadX</i> and DH5α <i>Δalr</i> <i>ΔdadX</i> | + | The <i>E. coli</i> strains KRX <i>Δalr</i> <i>ΔdadX</i> and DH5α <i>Δalr</i> <i>ΔdadX</i> respectively showed a strict dependence of D-alanine, but as mentioned <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/TransformationEfficiency">before</a> the ratio of false-positive transformants was slightly higher compared to the selection ratio on the antibiotic selection with chlormaphenicol. Even on the negative plate some colony forming untis were observable, while there were no colonies on the LB plate containing 30 mg/L Chloramphenicol. This effect migth be due to some revertants to the D-alanine auxotrophy and to the corresponding selection pressure. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | + | Therefore, the revertants were analyzed by spreading an overnight culture of the strains DH5α <i>Δalr</i> <i>ΔdadX</i> and DH5α <i>Δalr</i> <i>kan:dadX</i> on normal LB and several dilution onto LB medium containing 5 mM D-alanine. The same procedure was performed with the transformation approach. In both cases nearly the same revertants rate of 3.4 10<sup>-7</sup> (overnight culture) and 3.11 10<sup>-7</sup> ± 2.29 10<sup>-7</sup> (transformation) was investigated. There was no significant difference between the ratio of revertants of the strain DH5α <i>Δalr</i> <i>ΔdadX</i> (3.27 10<sup>-7</sup> ± 2.27 10<sup>-7</sup>) and DH5α <i>Δalr</i> <i>kan:dadX</i> (2.95 10<sup>-7</sup> ± 2.65 10<sup>-7</sup>), which indicates that an effect by contamination can be excluded and additional colonies are probably revertants which are able to accumulate D-alanine in some way. | |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | A possible explanation might be a point mutation in the coding sequence of the methionine repressor <i>metJ</i>, resulting in a similar mutation rate of 7 x 10<sup>-7</sup> (<a href="#Kang2011">Kang <i>et al.</i>, 2011</a>). Under normal circumstances the MetJ represses all essential genes for the biosynthesis of L-methionin like <i>metA, metB, metC, MetF, metE</i> and <i>metK</i> as well as the genes of the <i>metD</i> operon by using <i>S</i>-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as cofactor (Figure 11). | ||
- | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:600px"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_MetJ-supressor.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_MetJ-supressor.png" width="600px"></a><br> | ||
+ | <font size="2" style="text-align:center;"><b>Figure 11:</b> Supprression of the Methionine biopsynthesis by MetJ. A point mutation within the repressor leads to a higher expression of MetC, which is also able to catalyze the conversion from L-alanine into D-alanine in <i>E. coli</i>.</font> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | It was demonstrated that in the presence of L-methionine all affected genes are suppressed, no revertants are observable, and the reversion could not be quantified in its absence. This suggests that there is another methionine-repressible enzyme, which is able to accumulate D-alanine in <i>E. coli</i>. The revertants formed in the absence of L-methionine showed a higher expression of the Cystathionine β-lyase and point mutations in the MetJ repressor like R42C. It was demonstrated that a strict D-alanine auxotrophy can be restored by an expression of the natural <i>metJ</i> repressor from a plasmid or the additional deletion of <i>metC</i> (<a href="#Kang2011">Kang <i>et al.</i>, 2011</a>). | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | + | Until now the antibiotic-free selection was only demonstrated for small plasmids like <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465401">BBa_K1465401</a> as a backbone (3163 bp) and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450">BBa_J04450</a> (RFP, 1069 bp) as an insert, resulting in a plasmid-size of 4232 bp. For greater plasmids or more complicated cloning approaches the transformation and selection might be problematic if none or very few positive colonies are formed. In such a case the ratio of false-positive transformants might be higher which necessitates the addition of L-methionine or the deletion of <i>metC</i> to obtain an effective selection. For easy cloning approaches an effective selection might be already possible without L-methionine or an additional deletion of <i>metC</i>. | |
- | + | ||
</p> | </p> |
Latest revision as of 00:54, 18 October 2014
Biosafety - Antibiotic-free Selection
Remaining Challenges
The E. coli strains KRX Δalr ΔdadX and DH5α Δalr ΔdadX respectively showed a strict dependence of D-alanine, but as mentioned before the ratio of false-positive transformants was slightly higher compared to the selection ratio on the antibiotic selection with chlormaphenicol. Even on the negative plate some colony forming untis were observable, while there were no colonies on the LB plate containing 30 mg/L Chloramphenicol. This effect migth be due to some revertants to the D-alanine auxotrophy and to the corresponding selection pressure.
Therefore, the revertants were analyzed by spreading an overnight culture of the strains DH5α Δalr ΔdadX and DH5α Δalr kan:dadX on normal LB and several dilution onto LB medium containing 5 mM D-alanine. The same procedure was performed with the transformation approach. In both cases nearly the same revertants rate of 3.4 10-7 (overnight culture) and 3.11 10-7 ± 2.29 10-7 (transformation) was investigated. There was no significant difference between the ratio of revertants of the strain DH5α Δalr ΔdadX (3.27 10-7 ± 2.27 10-7) and DH5α Δalr kan:dadX (2.95 10-7 ± 2.65 10-7), which indicates that an effect by contamination can be excluded and additional colonies are probably revertants which are able to accumulate D-alanine in some way.
A possible explanation might be a point mutation in the coding sequence of the methionine repressor metJ, resulting in a similar mutation rate of 7 x 10-7 (Kang et al., 2011). Under normal circumstances the MetJ represses all essential genes for the biosynthesis of L-methionin like metA, metB, metC, MetF, metE and metK as well as the genes of the metD operon by using S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as cofactor (Figure 11).
It was demonstrated that in the presence of L-methionine all affected genes are suppressed, no revertants are observable, and the reversion could not be quantified in its absence. This suggests that there is another methionine-repressible enzyme, which is able to accumulate D-alanine in E. coli. The revertants formed in the absence of L-methionine showed a higher expression of the Cystathionine β-lyase and point mutations in the MetJ repressor like R42C. It was demonstrated that a strict D-alanine auxotrophy can be restored by an expression of the natural metJ repressor from a plasmid or the additional deletion of metC (Kang et al., 2011).
Until now the antibiotic-free selection was only demonstrated for small plasmids like BBa_K1465401 as a backbone (3163 bp) and BBa_J04450 (RFP, 1069 bp) as an insert, resulting in a plasmid-size of 4232 bp. For greater plasmids or more complicated cloning approaches the transformation and selection might be problematic if none or very few positive colonies are formed. In such a case the ratio of false-positive transformants might be higher which necessitates the addition of L-methionine or the deletion of metC to obtain an effective selection. For easy cloning approaches an effective selection might be already possible without L-methionine or an additional deletion of metC.
References
-
Kang L, Shaw AC, Xu D, Xia W, Zhang J, Deng J, Wöldike HF, Liu Y, Su J. (2011) Upregulation of MetC is essential for D-alanine-independent growth of an alr/dadX-deficient Escherichia coli strain. Journal of bacteriology, vol. 193, pp. 1098 - 1106.