Team:HZAU-China/Biological
From 2014.igem.org
(24 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
<!-- logo start here --> | <!-- logo start here --> | ||
<div id="logo-left"> | <div id="logo-left"> | ||
- | <a href="https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2014&team_name=HZAU-China"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/ | + | <a href="https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2014&team_name=HZAU-China"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4c/Hzau-home-lllogo.png" alt="HZAU-China" /></a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- logo end here --> | <!-- logo end here --> | ||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
<li class="dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Project">Project</a> | <li class="dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Project">Project</a> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/ | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Design"><span>-</span>Overview</a></li> |
- | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Background"><span>-</span>Background</a></li> | |
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Input"><span>-</span>Input module</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Input"><span>-</span>Input module</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Processing"><span>-</span>Processing module</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Processing"><span>-</span>Processing module</a></li> | ||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
<li class="dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Review">Wetlab</a> | <li class="dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Review">Wetlab</a> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/ | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Overview"><span>-</span>Overview</a></li> |
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Construction"><span>-</span>Construction</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Construction"><span>-</span>Construction</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Characterization"><span>-</span>Characterization</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Characterization"><span>-</span>Characterization</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Help"><span>-</span>Help each other</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Protocol"><span>-</span>Protocol</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Protocol"><span>-</span>Protocol</a></li> | ||
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Labnotes"><span>-</span>Labnotes</a></li> | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Labnotes"><span>-</span>Labnotes</a></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li class="selected dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Modeling">Modeling</a> | <li class="selected dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Modeling">Modeling</a> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/ | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/MOverview"><span>-</span>Overview</a></li> |
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Biological"><span>-</span>Biological processes</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Biological"><span>-</span>Biological processes</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Comparison"><span>-</span>Comparison between different designs</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Comparison"><span>-</span>Comparison between different designs</a></li> | ||
Line 196: | Line 197: | ||
<li class="dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Achievements">Achievements</a> | <li class="dropdown"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Achievements">Achievements</a> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Achievements"><span>-</span> | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Achievements"><span>-</span>Judgement</a></li> |
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Parts"><span>-</span>Parts</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Parts"><span>-</span>Parts</a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 212: | Line 213: | ||
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Collaboration"><span>-</span>Collaboration</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Collaboration"><span>-</span>Collaboration</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Meetup"><span>-</span>Meetup</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Meetup"><span>-</span>Meetup</a></li> | ||
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Humanities"><span>-</span>Humanities | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Humanities"><span>-</span>Humanities</a></li> |
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Economics"><span>-</span> | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Economics"><span>-</span>Social Sciences</a></li> |
- | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Pubic outreach"><span>-</span> | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Pubic outreach"><span>-</span>Public outreach</a></li> |
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Safety"><span>-</span>Safety</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Safety"><span>-</span>Safety</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Social media"><span>-</span>Social media</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Social media"><span>-</span>Social media</a></li> | ||
Line 239: | Line 240: | ||
<div id="breadcrumb-content"> | <div id="breadcrumb-content"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href=" | + | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China">Home</a></li> |
- | <li | + | <li>Modeling</li> |
- | <li | + | <li>Biological processes</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 252: | Line 253: | ||
<div class="eleven columns"> | <div class="eleven columns"> | ||
<div class="offset-by-one columns"> | <div class="offset-by-one columns"> | ||
- | <p class="highlighttext">In this part, we will list the important biological processes and explain how the related molecules work, and then we can describe them using | + | <h3 style="text-align:center">Biological Processes</h3> |
+ | <p class="highlighttext">In this part, we will list the important biological processes and explain how the related molecules work, and then we can describe them using equations. Because the timescales of many processes are separated, we use a quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA) to reduce the number of dimensions in the systems in most cases. However, if we focus on some processes more than the final steady state, we may use other approximations such as prefactor method (Bennett <span style="font-style:italic;">et al.</span>, 2007).</p> | ||
<h5>2.1 Transcription and translation</h5> | <h5>2.1 Transcription and translation</h5> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/5a/Hzau-model-14.png" width="500px" class="img-center"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/5a/Hzau-model-14.png" width="500px" class="img-center"/> | ||
- | <p class="highlighttext">According to the Central Dogma, | + | <p class="highlighttext">According to the Central Dogma, DNAs can be transcribed into RNAs and RNAs can be translated into proteins. These processes sometimes can be regulated by some molecules like transcription factors or non-coding RNAs. The interactions among them can be understood by chemical reactions. We use one chemical reaction to depict the interaction between transcription factor $TF$ and inducible promoter $Pro$. We don't separate the polymerisation process and the binding process for simplicity </p> |
- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/20/Hzau-model-003.png" width="240px" class="img-center"/> | |
- | + | <p class="highlighttext"> | |
- | + | The equilibrium dissociation constant $K_D$ for the reaction can be calculated. | |
- | <p class="highlighttext">The equilibrium dissociation constant $K_D$ for the reaction can be calculated. | + | |
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
K_D=\frac{k_{-1}}{k_1}=\frac{[TF]^n\cdot [Pro]}{[Pro']}. | K_D=\frac{k_{-1}}{k_1}=\frac{[TF]^n\cdot [Pro]}{[Pro']}. | ||
Line 269: | Line 270: | ||
[Pro]+[Pro']=n. | [Pro]+[Pro']=n. | ||
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
- | Then the $Pro'$ proportion depends on the concentration of $TF$, and this proportion also be regarded as the probability of the binding events. | + | Then the $Pro'$ proportion depends on the concentration of $TF$, and this proportion can also be regarded as the probability of the binding events. |
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
P(\text{binding})=\frac{[Pro']}{n}=\frac{[TF]^n}{K_D+[TF]^n} | P(\text{binding})=\frac{[Pro']}{n}=\frac{[TF]^n}{K_D+[TF]^n} | ||
\end{equation}</p> | \end{equation}</p> | ||
- | <p class="highlighttext">If the transcription factor is | + | <p class="highlighttext">If the transcription factor is an activator, the gene is transcribed at the maximal transcription rate $\beta_1$ when the promoter is bound by the transcription factor. If the transcription factor is a repressor, the gene is transcribed at the maximal transcription rate $\beta_1$ when the promoter is free from the transcription factor.</p> |
<p class="highlighttext">In deterministic model, we use Hill function to describe the rate of production, which is $\beta_1$ times its occurring probability.</p> | <p class="highlighttext">In deterministic model, we use Hill function to describe the rate of production, which is $\beta_1$ times its occurring probability.</p> | ||
- | <p class="highlighttext">For transcription activation, the maximal transcription rate will occur if the activator | + | <p class="highlighttext">For transcription activation, the maximal transcription rate will occur if the activator binds to the promoter, so the Hill function is |
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
f(x)=\beta_1\frac{[TF]^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}. | f(x)=\beta_1\frac{[TF]^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}. | ||
Line 283: | Line 284: | ||
f(x)=\beta_1\frac{K^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}. | f(x)=\beta_1\frac{K^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}. | ||
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
- | $K$ is activation coefficient or repression coefficient, which | + | $K$ is activation coefficient or repression coefficient, which equals $\sqrt[n]{K_D}$.</p> |
- | <p class="highlighttext">In addition, many genes have a | + | <p class="highlighttext">In addition, many genes have a non-zero minimal expression level, namely basal expression level. It can be described by adding a term $\beta_0$. And some genes that have a constitutive promoter cannot be described by Hill function. We just set their production rate to be a constant.</p> |
<p class="highlighttext">The translation and degradation processes in our model are based on following reaction: | <p class="highlighttext">The translation and degradation processes in our model are based on following reaction: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ef/Hzau-model-01.png" width="320px" class="img-center"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ef/Hzau-model-01.png" width="320px" class="img-center"/> | ||
- | For translation process, the protein production rate is proportional to the corresponding mRNA concentration $K_{tl}\cdot mRNA$. $K_{tl}$ is determined by the efficiency and concentration of ribosome, the sequence of RBS and concentration of amino acids in the cell, which can be considered identical under the experiment condition. For degradation process, the degradation rate is proportional to the substrate. The proportion for mRNA is $K_{R}$ and the proportion for protein is $K_{P}$. So we list following equations, | + | For translation process, the protein production rate is proportional to the corresponding mRNA concentration $K_{tl}\cdot mRNA$. $K_{tl}$ is determined by the efficiency and concentration of ribosome, the sequence of RBS and the concentration of amino acids in the cell, which can be considered identical under the experiment condition. For degradation process, the degradation rate is proportional to the substrate. The proportion for mRNA is $K_{R}$ and the proportion for protein is $K_{P}$. So we list the following equations, |
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
\begin{aligned} | \begin{aligned} | ||
Line 301: | Line 302: | ||
<h5>2.2 RNA interaction</h5> | <h5>2.2 RNA interaction</h5> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4c/Hzau-model-12.png" width="600px" class="img-center"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4c/Hzau-model-12.png" width="600px" class="img-center"/> | ||
- | <p class="highlighttext">Different riboregulators have different regulation mechanisms to control the gene expression. Here what we used is a classical engineered riboregulator designed by Isaacs and his colleagues in 2004. This riboregulator can control the gene expression at post-transcription level. More details can be found in | + | <p class="highlighttext">Different riboregulators have different regulation mechanisms to control the gene expression. Here what we used is a classical engineered riboregulator designed by Isaacs and his colleagues in 2004. This riboregulator can control the gene expression at post-transcription level. More details can be found in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:HZAU-China/Input">the input module section</a>.</p> |
<p class="highlighttext">We describe the RNA interactions by this reaction: | <p class="highlighttext">We describe the RNA interactions by this reaction: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/13/Hzau-model-02.png" width="330px" class="img-center"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/13/Hzau-model-02.png" width="330px" class="img-center"/> | ||
Line 343: | Line 344: | ||
The complex can activate luxpR promoter and repress luxpL promoter. | The complex can activate luxpR promoter and repress luxpL promoter. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p class="highlighttext">Although the binding events about AHL can be described by some differential equations, we apply QSSA when we focus on the gene expression process, because the timescale of these binding events is much less than the | + | <p class="highlighttext">Although the binding events about AHL can be described by some differential equations, we apply QSSA when we focus on the gene expression process, because the timescale of these binding events is much less than the timescale of gene expression. So the change of AHL and AHL-LuxR complex over time can be described by differential equations: |
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
\begin{split} | \begin{split} | ||
Line 355: | Line 356: | ||
<h5>2.4 DNA recombination</h5> | <h5>2.4 DNA recombination</h5> | ||
- | <p class="highlighttext">Ringrose and his colleagues have developed mathematic models to describe the kinetics of Cre and Flp recombination. The site-specific recombination process can be mainly divided into four steps as the following figure depicts: DNA binding, synapsis, recombination and dissociation. The detailed mathematical representation can be found in previous research (Ringrose et al., 1998), so we didn't list them here. We want to explain Cre-mediated inversion using the mutated Cre/loxP system we used prefers the forward reaction. The difference between the mutated loxP site and wild type loxP site only influences the DNA binding and dissociation processes. So we focus on these two steps. A Cre monomer binds to one half of a loxP site and then an asymmetrical homodimer is formed when a second Cre molecule binds to the other half of loxP. | + | <p class="highlighttext">Ringrose and his colleagues have developed mathematic models to describe the kinetics of Cre and Flp recombination. The site-specific recombination process can be mainly divided into four steps as the following figure depicts: DNA binding, synapsis, recombination and dissociation. |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ad/Hzau-model-11.png" width="450px" class="img-center"/> </p> | ||
+ | <p class="highlighttext">The detailed mathematical representation can be found in previous research (Ringrose <span style="font-style:italic;">et al.</span>, 1998), so we didn't list them here. We want to explain Cre-mediated inversion using the mutated Cre/loxP system we used prefers the forward reaction. The difference between the mutated loxP site and wild type loxP site only influences the DNA binding and dissociation processes. So we focus on these two steps. A Cre monomer binds to one half of a loxP site and then an asymmetrical homodimer is formed when a second Cre molecule binds to the other half of loxP. | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7a/Hzau-model-06.png" width="310px" class="img-center"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7a/Hzau-model-06.png" width="310px" class="img-center"/> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 362: | Line 365: | ||
\frac{d[Cre\cdot lox]}{dt}=k_8\cdot [lox]\cdot [Cre]-k_{-8}[Cre\cdot lox]-k_9\cdot [Cre\cdot lox]\cdot [Cre]+k_{-9}\cdot[2Cre\cdot lox]=0, | \frac{d[Cre\cdot lox]}{dt}=k_8\cdot [lox]\cdot [Cre]-k_{-8}[Cre\cdot lox]-k_9\cdot [Cre\cdot lox]\cdot [Cre]+k_{-9}\cdot[2Cre\cdot lox]=0, | ||
\end{equation}</p> | \end{equation}</p> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<p class="highlighttext">The second dissociation process is the slowest reaction within these four reactions. Hence, we ignore the last term $k_{-9}\cdot[2Cre\cdot lox]$. Then we get the steady-state of intermediate products $Cre\cdot lox$ | <p class="highlighttext">The second dissociation process is the slowest reaction within these four reactions. Hence, we ignore the last term $k_{-9}\cdot[2Cre\cdot lox]$. Then we get the steady-state of intermediate products $Cre\cdot lox$ | ||
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
Line 373: | Line 374: | ||
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="clear"></div> | ||
+ | <div class="divider"></div> | ||
+ | |||
<h5>References</h5> | <h5>References</h5> | ||
Line 378: | Line 383: | ||
<p class="highlighttext">Ringrose, L., Lounnas, V., Ehrlich, L., Buchholz, F., Wade, R., & Stewart, A. F. (1998). Comparative kinetic analysis of FLP and cre recombinases: mathematical models for DNA binding and recombination. Journal of molecular biology, 284(2), 363-384.</p> | <p class="highlighttext">Ringrose, L., Lounnas, V., Ehrlich, L., Buchholz, F., Wade, R., & Stewart, A. F. (1998). Comparative kinetic analysis of FLP and cre recombinases: mathematical models for DNA binding and recombination. Journal of molecular biology, 284(2), 363-384.</p> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
Latest revision as of 03:23, 18 October 2014
<!DOCTYPE html>
Biological processes
Biological Processes
In this part, we will list the important biological processes and explain how the related molecules work, and then we can describe them using equations. Because the timescales of many processes are separated, we use a quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA) to reduce the number of dimensions in the systems in most cases. However, if we focus on some processes more than the final steady state, we may use other approximations such as prefactor method (Bennett et al., 2007).
2.1 Transcription and translation
According to the Central Dogma, DNAs can be transcribed into RNAs and RNAs can be translated into proteins. These processes sometimes can be regulated by some molecules like transcription factors or non-coding RNAs. The interactions among them can be understood by chemical reactions. We use one chemical reaction to depict the interaction between transcription factor $TF$ and inducible promoter $Pro$. We don't separate the polymerisation process and the binding process for simplicity
The equilibrium dissociation constant $K_D$ for the reaction can be calculated. \begin{equation} K_D=\frac{k_{-1}}{k_1}=\frac{[TF]^n\cdot [Pro]}{[Pro']}. \end{equation}
We assume that the DNA copy number is a constant n, \begin{equation} [Pro]+[Pro']=n. \end{equation} Then the $Pro'$ proportion depends on the concentration of $TF$, and this proportion can also be regarded as the probability of the binding events. \begin{equation} P(\text{binding})=\frac{[Pro']}{n}=\frac{[TF]^n}{K_D+[TF]^n} \end{equation}
If the transcription factor is an activator, the gene is transcribed at the maximal transcription rate $\beta_1$ when the promoter is bound by the transcription factor. If the transcription factor is a repressor, the gene is transcribed at the maximal transcription rate $\beta_1$ when the promoter is free from the transcription factor.
In deterministic model, we use Hill function to describe the rate of production, which is $\beta_1$ times its occurring probability.
For transcription activation, the maximal transcription rate will occur if the activator binds to the promoter, so the Hill function is \begin{equation} f(x)=\beta_1\frac{[TF]^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}. \end{equation}
For transcription repression, the maximal transcription rate will occur if the repressor doesn't bind to the promoter, so the Hill function is \begin{equation} f(x)=\beta_1\frac{K^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}. \end{equation} $K$ is activation coefficient or repression coefficient, which equals $\sqrt[n]{K_D}$.
In addition, many genes have a non-zero minimal expression level, namely basal expression level. It can be described by adding a term $\beta_0$. And some genes that have a constitutive promoter cannot be described by Hill function. We just set their production rate to be a constant.
The translation and degradation processes in our model are based on following reaction: For translation process, the protein production rate is proportional to the corresponding mRNA concentration $K_{tl}\cdot mRNA$. $K_{tl}$ is determined by the efficiency and concentration of ribosome, the sequence of RBS and the concentration of amino acids in the cell, which can be considered identical under the experiment condition. For degradation process, the degradation rate is proportional to the substrate. The proportion for mRNA is $K_{R}$ and the proportion for protein is $K_{P}$. So we list the following equations, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \frac{dmRNA_{Y}}{dt}&=\beta_0+\beta_1\frac{[TF]^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}-K_{R}\cdot mRNA_{Y} \text{ (activation)}\\ \frac{dmRNA_{Y}}{dt}&=\beta_0+\beta_1\frac{K^n}{K^n+[TF]^n}-K_{R}\cdot mRNA_{Y} \text{ (repression)}\\ \frac{dY}{dt}&=K_{tl}\cdot mRNA_{Y}-K_{P}\cdot Y. \end{aligned} \end{equation}
2.2 RNA interaction
Different riboregulators have different regulation mechanisms to control the gene expression. Here what we used is a classical engineered riboregulator designed by Isaacs and his colleagues in 2004. This riboregulator can control the gene expression at post-transcription level. More details can be found in the input module section.
We describe the RNA interactions by this reaction: which means \begin{equation} \frac{d[RNA\ duplex]}{dt}=k_2\cdot [taRNA]\cdot [crRNA]-k_{-2}\cdot [RNA\ duplex] \end{equation} This reaction is much faster than gene expression, so the equilibrium state can be reached quickly, \begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{d[RNA\ duplex]}{dt}&=0 \\ [RNA\ duplex]_{st}&=\frac{k_2}{k_{-2}}\cdot [taRNA]\cdot [crRNA] \end{split} \end{equation}
The total mRNA of the recombinase has two forms, $crRNA$ and $RNA\ duplex$, resulting in another equation: \begin{equation} [crRNA]+[RNA\ duplex]=[mRNA_{Cre}]. \end{equation} Then we have \begin{equation} [RNA\ duplex]_{st}=[mRNA_{Cre}]\cdot\frac{[taRNA]}{K_m+[taRNA]}, \end{equation} where $K_m=\frac{k_{-2}}{k_2}$. So the protein production rate depends on not only the concentration of its corresponding mRNA but also the concentration of $taRNA$. This translation process with post-transcriptional control can be described by \begin{equation} \frac{d[Cre]}{dt}=K_{tl}\cdot [mRNA_{Cre}]\cdot\frac{[taRNA]}{K_m+[taRNA]}-K_{P}\cdot [Cre] \end{equation}
2.3 Processes related to AHL
In this section, we describe the 3OC6HSL synthesis, degradation and regulation. 3OC6HSL, a kind of AHL, is enzymatically synthesised by LuxI proteins from some substrates. Here, we use AHL to refer to 3OC6HSL.
For simplicity, we assumed that the amount of substrates is sufficient so that the 3OC6HSL synthesis rate is proportional to the LuxI protein concentration. And the degradation of 3OC6HSL can be divided into two parts. With the help of the AHL-degrading enzyme, AHL-lactonase (AiiA), the AHL can be degraded at a high rate, since the complex of AiiA and AHL is more easy to be degraded. Also, the AHL itself can be degraded at a lower rate.
Besides, AHL can regulate gene expression by binding the protein LuxR. The complex can activate luxpR promoter and repress luxpL promoter.
Although the binding events about AHL can be described by some differential equations, we apply QSSA when we focus on the gene expression process, because the timescale of these binding events is much less than the timescale of gene expression. So the change of AHL and AHL-LuxR complex over time can be described by differential equations: \begin{equation} \begin{split} &\frac{d[AHL]}{dt}=k_3\cdot [LuxI]-k_4k_5\cdot [AHL] \cdot [AiiA]-k_6\cdot [AHL]-k_7\cdot [LuxR]^2\cdot [AHL]^2\\ &\frac{d[AHL\text{-}LuxR\ complex]}{dt}=k_7\cdot [LuxR]^2\cdot [AHL]^2-K_{P}\cdot [AHL\text{-}LuxR\ complex] \end{split} \end{equation}
2.4 DNA recombination
Ringrose and his colleagues have developed mathematic models to describe the kinetics of Cre and Flp recombination. The site-specific recombination process can be mainly divided into four steps as the following figure depicts: DNA binding, synapsis, recombination and dissociation.
The detailed mathematical representation can be found in previous research (Ringrose et al., 1998), so we didn't list them here. We want to explain Cre-mediated inversion using the mutated Cre/loxP system we used prefers the forward reaction. The difference between the mutated loxP site and wild type loxP site only influences the DNA binding and dissociation processes. So we focus on these two steps. A Cre monomer binds to one half of a loxP site and then an asymmetrical homodimer is formed when a second Cre molecule binds to the other half of loxP.
Because the concentration of intermediate products $Cre\cdot lox$ is very low, and $k_9>>k_{-8}>k_{-9}$, we can apply steady-state treatment to it, \begin{equation} \frac{d[Cre\cdot lox]}{dt}=k_8\cdot [lox]\cdot [Cre]-k_{-8}[Cre\cdot lox]-k_9\cdot [Cre\cdot lox]\cdot [Cre]+k_{-9}\cdot[2Cre\cdot lox]=0, \end{equation}
The second dissociation process is the slowest reaction within these four reactions. Hence, we ignore the last term $k_{-9}\cdot[2Cre\cdot lox]$. Then we get the steady-state of intermediate products $Cre\cdot lox$ \begin{equation} [Cre\cdot lox]_{st}=\frac{k_8\cdot [lox]\cdot [Cre]}{k_{-8}+k_9\cdot [Cre]}. \end{equation} So the reaction rate for $2Cre\cdot lox$ is \begin{equation} r_c(2Cre\cdot lox)=\frac{k_9}{k_{-9}}\cdot[Cre]\cdot\frac{k_8\cdot [lox]\cdot [Cre]}{k_{-8}+k_9\cdot [Cre]}=\frac{k_8k_9\cdot [lox]\cdot [Cre]^2}{k_{-8}k_{-9}+k_9k_{-9}\cdot [Cre]}. \end{equation}
References
Bennett, M. R., Volfson, D., Tsimring, L., & Hasty, J. (2007). Transient dynamics of genetic regulatory networks. Biophysical journal, 92(10), 3501-3512.
Ringrose, L., Lounnas, V., Ehrlich, L., Buchholz, F., Wade, R., & Stewart, A. F. (1998). Comparative kinetic analysis of FLP and cre recombinases: mathematical models for DNA binding and recombination. Journal of molecular biology, 284(2), 363-384.