Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP Science-Cafe

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(15 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
     <link href="//maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.1.0/css/font-awesome.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
     <link href="//maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.1.0/css/font-awesome.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
     <style type="text/css">
     <style type="text/css">
-
       body{font-family:'Open Sans',sans-serif;font-size:13px}header{box-shadow:0 6px 6px rgba(0,0,0,.3)}header .container{height:80px}header .logo{padding:10px 0 10px 80px}header .igem{position:absolute;top:20px;right:-50px;z-index:100}header .igem img{width:40px;height:40px}header ul{float:right;list-style:none}header ul li{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap}header ul li a{display:block;padding:0 15px;height:80px;line-height:80px;color:#000;text-decoration:none!important;transition:background-color .2s linear}header ul li a:active,header ul li a:hover,header ul li a:visited{background-color:#ecffeb;text-decoration:none!important;color:#000}header ul.dropdown-menu li{display:block}header ul.dropdown-menu li a{height:auto;padding:6px 20px;text-decoration:none}section{padding:50px 0}section h1{font-weight:300;font-size:48px;padding:0 0 50px}.dropdown-menu{margin:0}ul.menu li.dropdown:hover>ul.dropdown-menu{display:block}.bx-wrapper img{display:block;max-width:100%;min-width:970px;margin:0 auto}.welcome{padding:80px 0;background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/06/Uea_header-bg.png)}.about{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png)}.about h2{font-size:18px;font-weight:700}.about p.project{font-size:14px;padding:10px}.about p.project:last-of-type{padding-bottom:40px}.about .row:first-of-type{margin-bottom:40px}.about .col-md-4 i{transition:color .2s linear}.about .col-md-4:hover i{color:#2ECC71}.team{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png);transition:all .3s linear;padding:0 0 40px}.team .img-responsive{border-radius:20em;-webkit-border-radius:20em;-moz-border-radius:20em;-webkit-filter:grayscale(100%);-moz-filter:grayscale(100%);-ms-filter:grayscale(100%);filter:grayscale(100%);filter:gray;transition:all .3s linear;max-width:200px;margin:0 auto}.team .col-md-4:hover .img-responsive{-webkit-filter:none;-moz-filter:none;-ms-filter:none;filter:none}.team .row:first-of-type{margin-bottom:40px}.team h2{font-size:18px;font-weight:700;color:#019875}.team h3{font-size:13px;font-weight:700;color:#019875}.team .col-md-3{padding:0 30px}.team .meetourteam{margin-bottom:60px}.social{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png)}.sponsors .col-md-2{display:table;height:90px}.sponsors .middle{display:table-cell;vertical-align:middle}.sponsors .row:first-of-type{margin-bottom:40px}.general{padding-top:0;background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png)}.title{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/06/Uea_header-bg.png)}.title h1,.title h2{text-align:center}.title h1{margin-top:0;padding:40px 0;margin-bottom:40px}.title h2{font-size:18px;color:#999;margin:0 0 50px;padding-bottom:40px}.general p{margin:0 0 40px}.fa-8x{font-size:8em;color:#019875}.row .boxed-headline{width:100%;height:200px;background-color:#90C695}.container .overview{padding-bottom:40px}footer{color:#444;background-color:#FFFFF;padding:50px 0}footer ul.sponsors{float:left;width:100%;padding:0;margin:20px 0 0;list-style-type:none}footer ul.sponsors li{display:inline;padding:0 20px}footer ul.sponsors li img{width:90px}#top-section{border:0;height:14px;z-index:100;top:0;position:fixed;width:975px;left:50%;margin-left:-487px;background-color:transparent}#content,#globalWrapper{width:100%;height:100%;border:0;background-color:transparent;margin:0;padding:0;font-size:100%}#catlinks,#contentSub,#footer-box,#p-logo,#search-controls,#sitesub,.firstHeading,.printfooter,.visualClear{display:none}h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6{border-bottom:none}#bodyContent h1,#bodyContent h2{margin-bottom:40px}
+
       body{font-family:'Open Sans',sans-serif;font-size:13px}header{box-shadow:0 6px 6px rgba(0,0,0,.3)}header .container{height:80px}header .logo{padding:10px 0 10px 80px}header .igem{position:absolute;top:20px;right:-50px;z-index:100}header .igem img{width:40px;height:40px}header ul{float:right;list-style:none}header ul li{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap}header ul li a{display:block;padding:0 15px;height:80px;line-height:80px;color:#000;text-decoration:none!important;transition:background-color .2s linear}header ul li a:active,header ul li a:hover,header ul li a:visited{background-color:#ecffeb;text-decoration:none!important;color:#000}header ul.dropdown-menu li{display:block}header ul.dropdown-menu li a{height:auto;padding:6px 20px;text-decoration:none}section{padding:50px 0}section h1{font-weight:300;font-size:48px;padding:0 0 50px}.dropdown-menu{margin:0}ul.menu li.dropdown:hover>ul.dropdown-menu{display:block}.bx-wrapper img{display:block;max-width:100%;min-width:970px;margin:0 auto}.welcome{padding:80px 0;background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/06/Uea_header-bg.png)}.about{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png)}.about h2{font-size:18px;font-weight:700}.about p.project{font-size:14px;padding:10px}.about p.project:last-of-type{padding-bottom:40px}.about .row:first-of-type{margin-bottom:40px}.about .col-md-4 i{transition:color .2s linear}.about .col-md-4:hover i{color:#2ECC71}.team{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png);transition:all .3s linear;padding:0 0 40px}.team .img-responsive{border-radius:20em;-webkit-border-radius:20em;-moz-border-radius:20em;-webkit-filter:grayscale(100%);-moz-filter:grayscale(100%);-ms-filter:grayscale(100%);filter:grayscale(100%);filter:gray;transition:all .3s linear;max-width:200px;margin:0 auto}.team .col-md-4:hover .img-responsive{-webkit-filter:none;-moz-filter:none;-ms-filter:none;filter:none}.team .row:first-of-type{margin-bottom:40px}.team h2{font-size:18px;font-weight:700;color:#019875}.team h3{font-size:13px;font-weight:700;color:#019875}.team .col-md-3{padding:0 30px}.team .meetourteam{margin-bottom:60px}.social{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png)}.sponsors .col-md-2{display:table;height:90px}.sponsors .middle{display:table-cell;vertical-align:middle}.sponsors .row:first-of-type{margin-bottom:40px}.general{padding-top:0;background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/Uea_body-bg.png)}.title{background:url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/06/Uea_header-bg.png)}.title h1,.title h2{text-align:center}.title h1{margin-top:0;padding:40px 0;margin-bottom:40px}.title h2{font-size:18px;color:#999;margin:0 0 50px;padding-bottom:40px}.general p{margin:0 0 40px}.fa-8x{font-size:8em;color:#019875}.row .boxed-headline{width:100%;height:200px;background-color:#90C695}.container .overview{padding-bottom:40px}footer{color:#444;background-color:#FFFFF;padding:50px 0}footer ul.sponsors{float:left;width:100%;padding:0;margin:20px 0 0;list-style-type:none}footer ul.sponsors li{display:inline;padding:0 20px}footer ul.sponsors li img{width:90px}#top-section{border:0;height:14px;z-index:100;top:0;position:fixed;width:975px;left:50%;margin-left:-487px;background-color:transparent}#content,#globalWrapper{width:100%;height:100%;border:0;background-color:transparent;margin:0;padding:0;font-size:100%}#catlinks,#contentSub,#footer-box,#p-logo,#search-controls,#sitesub,.firstHeading,.printfooter,.visualClear{display:none}h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6{border-bottom:none}h2{margin-bottom:40px;font-size:18px;font-weight:700;color:#019875}.col-md-1,.col-md-10,.col-md-11,.col-md-12,.col-md-2,.col-md-3,.col-md-4,.col-md-5,.col-md-6,.col-md-7,.col-md-8,.col-md-9{float:left}.col-md-12{width:100%}.col-md-11{width:91.66666667%}.col-md-10{width:83.33333333%}.col-md-9{width:75%}.col-md-8{width:66.66666667%}.col-md-7{width:58.33333333%}.col-md-6{width:50%}.col-md-5{width:41.66666667%}.col-md-4{width:33.33333333%}.col-md-3{width:25%}.col-md-2{width:16.66666667%}.col-md-1{width:8.33333333%}.container{min-width:970px}ul.bxslider{margin:0 !important}
     </style>
     </style>
   </head>
   </head>
Line 75: Line 75:
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_CUT">The CUT event</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_CUT">The CUT event</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_School-Events">The Hewett School</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_School-Events">The Hewett School</a></li>
-
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_Science-Cafe">Science Cafe</a></li>
+
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_Science-Café">Science Café</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_Ethics">Ethics of Public Consultation</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/HP_Ethics">Ethics of Public Consultation</a></li>
                 </ul>
                 </ul>
Line 83: Line 83:
                 <ul class="dropdown-menu">
                 <ul class="dropdown-menu">
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Safety">Safety Overview</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Safety">Safety Overview</a></li>
-
                  <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Safety_Forms">Safety Forms</a></li>
 
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Safety_RA">Risk Assessments</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Safety_RA">Risk Assessments</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Safety_UEA">UEA Safety</a></li>
                   <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Safety_UEA">UEA Safety</a></li>
Line 102: Line 101:
     <section class="general">
     <section class="general">
       <div class="title">
       <div class="title">
-
         <h1 style="padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:0;"><b>Science Café at <i>The Cut</i>, Halesworth</b></h1> <h2>NRP-UEA iGEM attendees:  Jack Day, Steven Monsey, Richard Bowater (Advisor)</h2>
+
         <h1 style="padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:0;">Science Café at The CUT, Halesworth</h1> <h2>NRP-UEA iGEM attendees:  Jack Day, Steven Monsey, Richard Bowater (Advisor)</h2>
Line 108: Line 107:
       </div>
       </div>
       <div class="container">  
       <div class="container">  
-
On the 18th of September 2014 we once again ventured out to The Cut in Halesworth; this time to facilitate a more in-depth discussion in a ‘Science Café’ style debate on the topics surrounding our project, which included: genetic modification of plants and other organisms, crop disease, food security, the ethics behind scientific discovery, and the way scientists conduct themselves. This was also a great opportunity to build on the feedback on our project from the last event, as well as presenting our project to new audiences.  
+
<center>
 +
 
 +
<h2><font color="019875"><b>What was the aim of our Science Cafe?</b></font></h2>
 +
On the 18th of September 2014 we once again ventured out to The Cut in Halesworth; this time to facilitate a more in-depth discussion in a ‘Science Café’ style debate on the topics surrounding our project, which included: genetic modification of plants and other organisms, crop disease, food security, the ethics behind scientific discovery and the way scientists conduct their research. The Science Cafe was also a great opportunity to build on the feedback from our project from the last event at The Cut, as well as presenting our project to a new audience. The event attracted a varied mix of members of the public of all ages from Halesworth and beyond.
  <p>
  <p>
  </p>
  </p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c9/NRP-UEA_Cut.jpg" align="center" width="400">
 +
<center><i>Steven and Jack outside of The Cut before Science Café begins.</i></center>
 +
-
There was a good turnout for this type event, with the audience of about 30 people being a good mix of attendees from the previous event and new members, representing various professions and walks of life. The night started with Steven presenting the team’s project and motives to the audience, which then lead into a natural debate and discussion on the project and its surrounding topics with Steven, Jack and Richard answering questions from the audience.
+
<h2> What were the nights events? </h2>
 +
The night began with a presentation from Steven, a student member of the NRP-UEA iGEM team who gave an extensive talk on our summer project. Following the presentation, a natural debate formed in discussion with the audience in which Steven and a further iGEM student team member Jack answered questions posed by the audience, ranging from ethical issues to the science of synthetic biology and cloning.  
  <p>
  <p>
  </p>
  </p>
-
The discussion highlighted a number of points that were of interest to our project. Wherever possible, straightforward, clear answers to the questions were provided, but many of the discussion points were open-ended with no single answer. Here are some of the more interesting points and questions that were raised during the debate:
+
<h2><font color="019875"><b>What feedback did we receive on the Green Canary as a viable product for distribution?</b></font></h2>
-
 
+
The audience proved very enthusiastic and interested in hearing about the iGEM organisation and our project inparticular. The session proved to be a brilliant brainstorm for the issues we would need to address if we were to continue developing the Green Canary as a viable product, ready for distribution. Our team members scribed many of the audiences comments during the discussion and a varied selection of these comments are presented below:
 +
</center>
<p>
<p>
</p>
</p>
 +
<ul>
<li>Can the canary plant detect disease a lot earlier than the main crop so that there was a big enough window to allow spraying to happen and to protect the crop without crop loss?</li>
<li>Can the canary plant detect disease a lot earlier than the main crop so that there was a big enough window to allow spraying to happen and to protect the crop without crop loss?</li>
Line 131: Line 139:
<li>Indicator plants would need to have the same growth pattern and growth span as the crop which it is an indicator and this would need to be a major consideration in the final design.</li>
<li>Indicator plants would need to have the same growth pattern and growth span as the crop which it is an indicator and this would need to be a major consideration in the final design.</li>
  <br>
  <br>
-
<li>The idea of having rainbow indicators so an indicator plant that could detect more than one disease and indicate the disease it was detecting was thought to be valuable.</li>
+
<li>The idea of having rainbow indicators so an indicator plant that could detect more than one disease and indicate the disease it was detecting was thought to be a valuable concept.</li>
  <br>
  <br>
<li>How would the canary plants be delivered to the farmers? Would it be transported as a plant? Would it be transported as seeds?</li>
<li>How would the canary plants be delivered to the farmers? Would it be transported as a plant? Would it be transported as seeds?</li>
Line 141: Line 149:
<li>Would the indicator crops be lost or revert back to wild type after disease detection?</li>
<li>Would the indicator crops be lost or revert back to wild type after disease detection?</li>
  <br>
  <br>
-
<li>Would it affect other animals if they decided to eat it? How would it be made unattractive to other animals who might want or fancy eating it?</li>
+
<li>Would it affect other animals if they decided to eat it? How would it be made unattractive to other animals who might consume the Green Canary?</li>
 +
</ul>
<p>
<p>
Line 148: Line 157:
<p>
<p>
</p>
</p>
 +
<center>
-
On a general note the audience had real concerns about the idea and philosophy of having technology that was freely available to be used by anyone anywhere. They saw the potential that ‘big business’ could swoop in take on the ideas being produced by the iGEM teams and using it for ‘big business’ ends and means, which involved profit and also science and scientific practices that may be neither ethical or acceptable to the public. There was a clear suspicion of big business in this regard.
+
<h2>What issues were raised by some members of the audience during the Science Cafe? </h2>
 +
Some members of the audience had real concerns about the idea and philosophy of having technology that was freely available to be used by anyone anywhere. They saw the potential that ‘big business’ could potentially take on the ideas being produced by the iGEM teams and exploit it for ‘big business’ ends and means.  
  <p>
  <p>
  </p>
  </p>
-
The audience was also concerned that the iGEM Foundation/teams were not taking enough responsibility when it came to these concerns. They wanted to know what iGEM was doing to stop any of the scientific advances that have emerged from the programme to be used in potentially unethical or dangerous ways? Was iGEM taking no regulatory role in this at all? Were they really that naïve or was it a money thing where there is no money to look after this aspect and to evaluate the long-term impact of the competition within the scientific community or was it an optimism and a utopian vision that science is always for the good. Our audience felt this was not an acceptable standpoint and the iGEM committee needed to think about its role as guardian for the common good.
+
The audience were also concerned that the iGEM Foundation/teams were not taking enough responsibility when it came to these concerns. They wanted to know what iGEM was doing to stop any of the scientific advances that have emerged from the programme to be used in potentially unethical or dangerous ways? Was iGEM taking no regulatory role in this at all? Members of our audience felt that the iGEM committee should consider these issues as their role is to act as guardian for the common good.
  <p>
  <p>
  </p>
  </p>
-
This debate produced some really interesting points and ideas regarding our project and the way scientists and iGEM conducts itself in the wider community interacting with members of the general public.  
+
 
 +
<h2><font color="019875"><b>What did our iGEM team learn from this event?</b></font></h2>
 +
The NRP-UEA iGEM team came away from the event with a much better understanding of the issues of producing a viable product for distribution. Additionally, ethical issues were raised by members of the audience with a farming background which proved vital when assessing the ethical viability of a plant sentinel.
  <p>
  <p>
  </p>
  </p>
-
The event was such a success, that the Science Cafes will continue at The Cut on a regular basis in the future, discussing a wide variety of scientific subjects.
+
The event was such a success, that the Science Cafes will continue at The Cut on a regular basis in the future, discussing a wide variety of subjects including synthetic biology and the global issue of food security.
  <p>
  <p>
  </p>
  </p>

Latest revision as of 20:34, 17 October 2014

NRP UEA Norwich iGEM 2014

Science Café at The CUT, Halesworth

NRP-UEA iGEM attendees: Jack Day, Steven Monsey, Richard Bowater (Advisor)

What was the aim of our Science Cafe?

On the 18th of September 2014 we once again ventured out to The Cut in Halesworth; this time to facilitate a more in-depth discussion in a ‘Science Café’ style debate on the topics surrounding our project, which included: genetic modification of plants and other organisms, crop disease, food security, the ethics behind scientific discovery and the way scientists conduct their research. The Science Cafe was also a great opportunity to build on the feedback from our project from the last event at The Cut, as well as presenting our project to a new audience. The event attracted a varied mix of members of the public of all ages from Halesworth and beyond.

Steven and Jack outside of The Cut before Science Café begins.

What were the nights events?

The night began with a presentation from Steven, a student member of the NRP-UEA iGEM team who gave an extensive talk on our summer project. Following the presentation, a natural debate formed in discussion with the audience in which Steven and a further iGEM student team member Jack answered questions posed by the audience, ranging from ethical issues to the science of synthetic biology and cloning.

What feedback did we receive on the Green Canary as a viable product for distribution?

The audience proved very enthusiastic and interested in hearing about the iGEM organisation and our project inparticular. The session proved to be a brilliant brainstorm for the issues we would need to address if we were to continue developing the Green Canary as a viable product, ready for distribution. Our team members scribed many of the audiences comments during the discussion and a varied selection of these comments are presented below:

  • Can the canary plant detect disease a lot earlier than the main crop so that there was a big enough window to allow spraying to happen and to protect the crop without crop loss?

  • The concept may work for some crop diseases, such as those propagated by the target bacteria, but would it work for others carried into the plants by insect vectors?

  • Would the fact that this plant is not a crop mean that it would avoid legislation involved or associated with GM crops?

  • Some agrochemicals currently used by farmers are thiocyanides and there are implicit health costs associated with indiscriminate use for farmers and agricultural workers, so the canary plants would help reduce this.

  • Indicator plants would need to have the same growth pattern and growth span as the crop which it is an indicator and this would need to be a major consideration in the final design.

  • The idea of having rainbow indicators so an indicator plant that could detect more than one disease and indicate the disease it was detecting was thought to be a valuable concept.

  • How would the canary plants be delivered to the farmers? Would it be transported as a plant? Would it be transported as seeds?

  • Considering the third world audience and problems targeted by the green canary project, there would need to be a set of educational packages and supporting mechanisms available to farmers to ensure that the ‘canary plants’ were used effectively and well – some of these points could be quite simple. For example how and when should they be planted? What does it mean when the plants change colour? What would you do to change the treatment plans or what do you do after you spot or see a certain colour change?

  • Concern that indicators may not be ideal for people that are colour blind, which affects a significant amount of the population.

  • Would the indicator crops be lost or revert back to wild type after disease detection?

  • Would it affect other animals if they decided to eat it? How would it be made unattractive to other animals who might consume the Green Canary?

What issues were raised by some members of the audience during the Science Cafe?

Some members of the audience had real concerns about the idea and philosophy of having technology that was freely available to be used by anyone anywhere. They saw the potential that ‘big business’ could potentially take on the ideas being produced by the iGEM teams and exploit it for ‘big business’ ends and means.

The audience were also concerned that the iGEM Foundation/teams were not taking enough responsibility when it came to these concerns. They wanted to know what iGEM was doing to stop any of the scientific advances that have emerged from the programme to be used in potentially unethical or dangerous ways? Was iGEM taking no regulatory role in this at all? Members of our audience felt that the iGEM committee should consider these issues as their role is to act as guardian for the common good.

What did our iGEM team learn from this event?

The NRP-UEA iGEM team came away from the event with a much better understanding of the issues of producing a viable product for distribution. Additionally, ethical issues were raised by members of the audience with a farming background which proved vital when assessing the ethical viability of a plant sentinel.

The event was such a success, that the Science Cafes will continue at The Cut on a regular basis in the future, discussing a wide variety of subjects including synthetic biology and the global issue of food security.

Next Event: http://newcut.org/events/entry/2049
Visit The Cut Website: http://newcut.org/
A big thank you to our sponsors