Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/AdhA

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 51: Line 51:
   <h6>Alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhA)</h6>
   <h6>Alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhA)</h6>
<p>
<p>
-
During our literature research about the isobutanol production pathway we found out, that the AdhA from <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#L.lactis" target="_blank"><i>Lactococcus lactis</i></a> is the best described alcohol dehydrogenase in the literature (<a href="#Atsumi2008">Atsumi et al., 2008</a>, <a href="#Atsumi2010">Atsumi et al., 2010</a>). For that reason we wanted to increase the production of isobutanol by cloning the adhA gene behind our production pathway. The <i>adhA</i> from <i>L. Lactis</i> was not  available as a BioBrick so we designed a new part which contains the coding sequence it (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a>). You can read more about our approach in the following sections.  
+
During our literature research about the isobutanol production pathway we found out, that the alcohol dehydrogenase from <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#L.lactis" target="_blank"><i>Lactococcus lactis</i></a> (AdhA) is more efficient than the one from <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#E.coli" target="_blank"><i>Escherichia coli</i></a> (<a href="#Atsumi2008">Atsumi et al., 2008</a>, <a href="#Atsumi2010">Atsumi et al., 2010</a>). For that reason we wanted to increase the production of isobutanol by cloning the <i>adhA</i> gene behind our production pathway. The <i>adhA</i> from <i>L. Lactis</i> was not  available as a BioBrick so we designed a new part which contains the coding sequence (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a>). You can read more about our approach in the following sections.  
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
Line 60: Line 60:
   <h6>Cloning</h6>
   <h6>Cloning</h6>
     <p>
     <p>
-
For the isolation of the <i>adhA</i> gene from <i>L. lactis</i> we first had to <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#DNAisolation" target="_blank">isolate the genomic DNA</a>. Afterwards we amplified the <i>adhA</i> gene with the primer <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Primer#rev_pSB1C3_adhA" target="_blank">rev_pSB1C3_adhA</a> and <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Primer#fw_adhA_pSB1C3" target="_blank">fw_adhA_pSB1C3</a>. Via these primer the <i>ahdA</i> gene was combined with the RBS <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034" target="_blank">BBa_B0034</a>. Together with the amplified backbone we performed a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Gibson" target="_blank">Gibson Assembly</a>. All verifications proofed that our cloning was successful but our backbone was <i>pSB1K3</i> and not <i>pSB1C3</i>. For that reason we performed a successful recloning in <i>pSB1C3</i> and <i><b>pSB1C3_adhA</b></i> is our part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a> which is ready for usage.  
+
For the isolation of the <i>adhA</i> gene from <i>L. lactis</i> we first had to <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#DNAisolation" target="_blank">isolate the genomic DNA</a>. Afterwards we amplified the <i>adhA</i> gene with the primer <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Primer#rev_pSB1C3_adhA" target="_blank">rev_pSB1C3_adhA</a> and <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Primer#fw_adhA_pSB1C3" target="_blank">fw_adhA_pSB1C3</a>. Via these primer the <i>ahdA</i> gene was combined with the RBS <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034" target="_blank">BBa_B0034</a>. Together with the amplified backbone we performed a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Gibson" target="_blank">Gibson Assembly</a>. We verified the correct insertion of the adhA connected with RBS in the backbone pSB1k3 via colony PCR and sequencing. Please note, that due to difficulties during the cloning process, we first did an intermediate cloning step into the pSB1K3 backbone. For that reason we performed a successful recloning in <i>pSB1C3</i> which lead to the <i><b>pSB1C3_adhA</b></i>.This is our part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a> which is ready for usage.  
<br><br>
<br><br>
For the characterization of our BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a> we needed a promoter for expression and therefore performed a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#BioBrick" target="_blank">BioBrick Suffix Assembly</a> with <i>pSB1A2_T7</i>  
For the characterization of our BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a> we needed a promoter for expression and therefore performed a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#BioBrick" target="_blank">BioBrick Suffix Assembly</a> with <i>pSB1A2_T7</i>  
(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I719005" target="_blank">BBa_I719005
(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I719005" target="_blank">BBa_I719005
-
</a>) and our part. We wanted to have the new created part in pSB1C3 too, so a successful recloning in pSB1C3 was done resulting in <i><b>pSB1C3_T7_adhA</b></i>. The new part can now be found as the BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465304" target="_blank">BBa_K1465304</a>.
+
</a>) and our part. We used pSB1A2_T7 because still ongoing cloning difficulties with the pSB1C3. Nevertheless, we wanted to have the new created part in pSB1C3 too, so a successful recloning in pSB1C3 was done resulting in <i><b>pSB1C3_T7_adhA</b></i>. The new part can now be found as the BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465304" target="_blank">BBa_K1465304</a>.
<br>
<br>
-
Additionally we performed a BioBrick Prefix Assembly with the <i>pSB1C3_ptac</i>
+
Additionally we performed a BioBrick Prefix Assembly with the <i>pSB1C3_Ptac</i>
-
(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K731500" target="_blank">BBa_K731500</a>) and our part. The successfully created part <i><b>pSB1C3_ptac_adhA</b></i> can now also be found as the BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465305" target="_blank">BBa_K1465305</a>.
+
(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K731500" target="_blank">BBa_K731500</a>) and our part. The successfully created part <i><b>pSB1C3_Ptac_adhA</b></i> can now also be found as the BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465305" target="_blank">BBa_K1465305</a>.
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
Line 76: Line 76:
   <h6>Expression</h6>
   <h6>Expression</h6>
     <p>
     <p>
-
For the protein expression analysis of AdhA we performed a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Cultivation_for_Expression_of_recombinant_proteins" target="_blank">cultivation</a> of <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#E.coli" target="_blank"><i>Escherichia coli</i></a> KRX with our inducible construct <i>pSB1A2_T7_adhA</i>. Samples were taken like explained in the <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#FastCellLysisforSDS-PAGE" target="_blank"> cell lysis for a SDS-PAGE Protocol</a>. Protein expression was induced with rhamnose when the culture reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0,8. The first sample was taken right before the induction. Additionally we took samples one, two, three and 20 hours after the induction. With these samples, we made a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Sodiumdodecylsulfatepolyacrylamidegelelectrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)" target="_blank">SDS Page</a> (Figure 1).
+
For the protein expression analysis of AdhA we performed a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Cultivation_for_Expression_of_recombinant_proteins" target="_blank">cultivation</a> of <i>E. coli</i> KRX with our inducible construct <i>pSB1A2_T7_adhA</i>. Samples were taken like explained in the <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#FastCellLysisforSDS-PAGE" target="_blank"> cell lysis for a SDS-PAGE Protocol</a>. Protein expression was induced with rhamnose when the culture reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0,8. The first sample was taken right before the induction. Additionally we took samples one, two, three and 20 hours after the induction. With these samples, we performed a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Sodiumdodecylsulfatepolyacrylamidegelelectrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)" target="_blank">SDS Page</a> (Figure 1).
<center>
<center>
<div class="element" style="height:300px; width:450px; text-align:center" id="SDS-Page_AdhA">
<div class="element" style="height:300px; width:450px; text-align:center" id="SDS-Page_AdhA">
Line 83: Line 83:
                     </div>
                     </div>
</center>
</center>
-
You can see that the size of the band at a mass of ~ 38 kD increases the later the sample was taken. There is a conspicuously difference between the size of the bands of the point of induction and 20 hours later. This is an indication for the successful overexpression of the AdhA (35,776 Da).
+
One can see that the size of the band at a mass of ~ 38 kD increases the later the sample was taken. There is a conspicuously difference between the size of the bands at the point of induction and 20 hours later. This is an indication for the successful overexpression of the AdhA (35,776 Da).
<br>
<br>
-
Analytics via <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Matrix-assistedLaserDesorption/Ionization–Timeofflight (MALDI-TOF)" target="_blank">MALDI-TOF</a> identified the band at ~ 38 kD as the alcohol dehydrogenase (adhA) from the organism <i>L. lactis</i>. The analysis was done via tryptic digestion <i>in silico</i> and alignment of the identified peptides with the <i>in silico</i> peptides. Three identical peptides could be found and the sequence coverage (MS) was 13.3 %. The sequence coverage (MS/MS) was 4.0 %. Analyzing a second sample (the band was cut into two pieces), two identical bands were found with a sequence coverage of 8.4 % (MS) and 4.0 % (MS/MS).
+
Analytics via <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#Matrix-assistedLaserDesorption/Ionization–Timeofflight (MALDI-TOF)" target="_blank">MALDI-TOF</a> identified the band at ~ 38 kD as the alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhA) from the organism <i>L. lactis</i>. The analysis was done via tryptic digestion and comparison to an <i>in silico</i> computed peptide mass pattern. Three matching peptid masses could be found and the sequence coverage (MS) was 13.3 %. The sequence coverage (MS/MS) was 4.0 %. Analyzing a second sample (the band was cut into two pieces), two identical bands were found with a sequence coverage of 8.4 % (MS) and 4.0 % (MS/MS).
</p>
</p>
-
These evidences lead to the conclusion that the AdhA was successfully overexpressed in <i>E. coli</i> KRX.
+
These considerations lead to the conclusion that the AdhA was successfully overexpressed in <i>E. coli</i> KRX.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Line 95: Line 95:
   <h6>Conclusion</h6>
   <h6>Conclusion</h6>
     <p>
     <p>
-
We successfully created three new BioBricks (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465304" target="_blank">BBa_K1465304</a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465305" target="_blank">BBa_K1465305</a>). We also could demonstrate the successful overexpression of the AdhA from <i>L. lactis</i> in <i>E.coli</i> via <a href="#SDS-Page_AdhA">SDS Page</a> and following MALDI-TOF.  
+
We successfully created three new BioBricks (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465301" target="_blank">BBa_K1465301</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465304" target="_blank">BBa_K1465304</a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465305" target="_blank">BBa_K1465305</a>). We also could demonstrate the successful overexpression of the AdhA from <i>L. lactis</i> in <i>E.coli</i> via <a href="#SDS-Page_AdhA">SDS Page</a> and follow-up MALDI-TOF analysis.
<br>
<br>
-
This part is used in our <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Pathway">isobutanol production pathway</a>. A alcohol dehydrogenase is required for the conversion of isobutyraldehyde into isobutanol.
+
This part is used in our <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Pathway">isobutanol production pathway</a>. An alcohol dehydrogenase is required for the conversion of isobutyraldehyde into isobutanol.
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 01:10, 18 October 2014


Module III - Isobutanol production

Alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhA)

During our literature research about the isobutanol production pathway we found out, that the alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactococcus lactis (AdhA) is more efficient than the one from Escherichia coli (Atsumi et al., 2008, Atsumi et al., 2010). For that reason we wanted to increase the production of isobutanol by cloning the adhA gene behind our production pathway. The adhA from L. Lactis was not available as a BioBrick so we designed a new part which contains the coding sequence (BBa_K1465301). You can read more about our approach in the following sections.

Cloning

For the isolation of the adhA gene from L. lactis we first had to isolate the genomic DNA. Afterwards we amplified the adhA gene with the primer rev_pSB1C3_adhA and fw_adhA_pSB1C3. Via these primer the ahdA gene was combined with the RBS BBa_B0034. Together with the amplified backbone we performed a Gibson Assembly. We verified the correct insertion of the adhA connected with RBS in the backbone pSB1k3 via colony PCR and sequencing. Please note, that due to difficulties during the cloning process, we first did an intermediate cloning step into the pSB1K3 backbone. For that reason we performed a successful recloning in pSB1C3 which lead to the pSB1C3_adhA.This is our part BBa_K1465301 which is ready for usage.

For the characterization of our BioBrick BBa_K1465301 we needed a promoter for expression and therefore performed a BioBrick Suffix Assembly with pSB1A2_T7 (BBa_I719005 ) and our part. We used pSB1A2_T7 because still ongoing cloning difficulties with the pSB1C3. Nevertheless, we wanted to have the new created part in pSB1C3 too, so a successful recloning in pSB1C3 was done resulting in pSB1C3_T7_adhA. The new part can now be found as the BioBrick BBa_K1465304.
Additionally we performed a BioBrick Prefix Assembly with the pSB1C3_Ptac (BBa_K731500) and our part. The successfully created part pSB1C3_Ptac_adhA can now also be found as the BioBrick BBa_K1465305.

Expression

For the protein expression analysis of AdhA we performed a cultivation of E. coli KRX with our inducible construct pSB1A2_T7_adhA. Samples were taken like explained in the cell lysis for a SDS-PAGE Protocol. Protein expression was induced with rhamnose when the culture reached an OD600 of 0,8. The first sample was taken right before the induction. Additionally we took samples one, two, three and 20 hours after the induction. With these samples, we performed a SDS Page (Figure 1).


Figure 1: SDS page from pSB1A2_T7_adhA.
The mass of the overexpressed protein AdhA is 35,776 Da
One can see that the size of the band at a mass of ~ 38 kD increases the later the sample was taken. There is a conspicuously difference between the size of the bands at the point of induction and 20 hours later. This is an indication for the successful overexpression of the AdhA (35,776 Da).
Analytics via MALDI-TOF identified the band at ~ 38 kD as the alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhA) from the organism L. lactis. The analysis was done via tryptic digestion and comparison to an in silico computed peptide mass pattern. Three matching peptid masses could be found and the sequence coverage (MS) was 13.3 %. The sequence coverage (MS/MS) was 4.0 %. Analyzing a second sample (the band was cut into two pieces), two identical bands were found with a sequence coverage of 8.4 % (MS) and 4.0 % (MS/MS).

These considerations lead to the conclusion that the AdhA was successfully overexpressed in E. coli KRX.
Conclusion

We successfully created three new BioBricks (BBa_K1465301, BBa_K1465304 and BBa_K1465305). We also could demonstrate the successful overexpression of the AdhA from L. lactis in E.coli via SDS Page and follow-up MALDI-TOF analysis.
This part is used in our isobutanol production pathway. An alcohol dehydrogenase is required for the conversion of isobutyraldehyde into isobutanol.


References
  • Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC., 2008. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. In: Nature 451, 86–89.
  • Atsumi S, Wu TY, Eckl EM, Hawkins SD, Buelter T, Liao JC. 2010. Engineering the isobutanol biosynthetic pathway in Escherichia coli by comparison three aldehyde reductase/alcohol dehydrogenase genes. In: Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 85, 651–657