Team:Aachen/OD/F device
From 2014.igem.org
(→Modus operandi of OD/F Device) |
(→Achievements) |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
== Achievements == | == Achievements == | ||
<span class="anchor" id="odfachievements"></span> | <span class="anchor" id="odfachievements"></span> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
When building the OD/F Device, '''our goal''' was to develop a system that | When building the OD/F Device, '''our goal''' was to develop a system that | ||
Line 105: | Line 101: | ||
* can measured both optical density and fluorescence | * can measured both optical density and fluorescence | ||
- | Commercially available equipment uses lasers and a set of two fine filters, one between laser and sample and one between sample and sensor. To reduce the cost | + | Commercially available equipment uses lasers and a set of two fine filters, one between laser and sample and one between sample and sensor. To reduce the cost, our OD/F Device uses a simpler measuring principle: it is designed with one low-quality filter, between sample and sensor, and illuminates with an LED instead of a laser. Nevertheless, one main goal was to produce an inexpensive device. Given that, we therefore had to compromise some of the measurement quality, were we still able to produce stable, precise and good data? |
[graphs showing the awesomeness of our OD/F device] | [graphs showing the awesomeness of our OD/F device] | ||
Line 111: | Line 107: | ||
The answer is: Yes! With the optimal design of our cuvette holder we achieved good-quality results albeit using the cheap filter. | The answer is: Yes! With the optimal design of our cuvette holder we achieved good-quality results albeit using the cheap filter. | ||
- | + | Have we been re-inventing the wheel? No! | |
+ | In fact, you can find some DIY posts for turbidity meters such as [http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:74415 turbidity sensors]. However, a proper assessment of their linearity as well as a calculated OD-value are missing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Regarding fluorescence, we are also not re-inventing the wheel. The [https://2010.igem.org/Team:Cambridge 2010 iGEM Cambridge] team actually built a very similar device, the [https://2010.igem.org/Team:Cambridge/Tools/Eglometer E.glometer]. However, there's no data available showing an actual comparison of the data from their device and some proven commercial system to, for example, assess linearity of the measurement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We made a commercial assessment of the OD/F device that results in a total cost of 60 $. The unit is built with light plexiglass for the casing and the compact design and weighs less than 200 g and can be easily connected to any power adapter via USB. Thetechnical details and a construction manual of OD/F device is [https://2014.igem.org/Team:Aachen/Notebook/Engineering/ODF#diy published] on our wiki. | ||
[[File:Aachen_14-10-16_Outlook_Cellocks_iNB.png|right|150px]] | [[File:Aachen_14-10-16_Outlook_Cellocks_iNB.png|right|150px]] |
Revision as of 17:09, 17 October 2014
|
|
|
|