Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/rMFC/ElectronTransfer

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 308: Line 308:
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:800px">  
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:800px">  
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Fumarat_Succinat_WT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Fumarat_Succinat_WT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" width="800px"></a><br>
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Fumarat_Succinat_WT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Fumarat_Succinat_WT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" width="800px"></a><br>
-
<font size="2" style="text-align:left;"><b>Figure XXX</b>: Results of <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#AnaerobicCultivation">anaerobic cultivation</a> of <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype with strong expression of frd (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465102">BBa_1465102</a>) in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Media#M9medium">M9 minimal medium</a> with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.</font>
+
<font size="2" style="text-align:left;"><b>Figure XXX</b>: Results of <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#AnaerobicCultivation">anaerobic cultivation</a> of <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype with strong expression of <i>frd</i> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465102">BBa_1465102</a>) in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Media#M9medium">M9 minimal medium</a> with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.</font>
</div>
</div>
</center>
</center>
Line 316: Line 316:
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:800px">  
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:800px">  
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/aa/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Wachstum_WT_vs._Wt%2Bfrd.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/aa/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Wachstum_WT_vs._Wt%2Bfrd.jpg" width="800px"></a><br>
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/aa/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Wachstum_WT_vs._Wt%2Bfrd.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/aa/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Wachstum_WT_vs._Wt%2Bfrd.jpg" width="800px"></a><br>
-
<font size="2" style="text-align:left;"><b>Figure XXX</b>: Growth of <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype with strong expression of frd (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465102">BBa_1465102</a>) compared to <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype under <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#AnaerobicCultivation">anaerobic condition</a> in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Media#M9medium">M9 minimal medium</a> with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.</font>
+
<font size="2" style="text-align:left;"><b>Figure XXX</b>: Growth of <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype with strong expression of <i>frd</i> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465102">BBa_1465102</a>) compared to <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype under <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#AnaerobicCultivation">anaerobic condition</a> in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Media#M9medium">M9 minimal medium</a> with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.</font>
</div>
</div>
</center>
</center>
Line 324: Line 324:
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:800px">  
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:800px">  
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e0/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Succinate_Fumarate_WTvsWT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e0/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Succinate_Fumarate_WTvsWT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" width="800px"></a><br>
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e0/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Succinate_Fumarate_WTvsWT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e0/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_14-10-17_Succinate_Fumarate_WTvsWT%2Bfrd_anaerob.jpg" width="800px"></a><br>
-
<font size="2" style="text-align:left;"><b>Figure XXX</b>: Comparison of fumarate consumption and succinate production in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#AnaerobicCultivation">anaerobic cultivation</a> of <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype and i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype with strong expression of frd (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465102">BBa_1465102</a>) in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Media#M9medium">M9 minimal medium</a> with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.</font>
+
<font size="2" style="text-align:left;"><b>Figure XXX</b>: Comparison of fumarate consumption and succinate production in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#AnaerobicCultivation">anaerobic cultivation</a> of <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype and i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype with strong expression of <i>frd</i> (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465102">BBa_1465102</a>) in <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Media#M9medium">M9 minimal medium</a> with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.</font>
</div>
</div>
</center>
</center>
Line 331: Line 331:
<br>  
<br>  
<br>
<br>
-
As expected figure XXX shows production of succinate by <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype under anaerobic condition with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate as sole carbon sources.<br>
+
As expected figure XXX shows production of succinate by <i>Escherichia coli</i> KRX wildtype under anaerobic condition with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate as sole carbon sources. Under anaerobic conditions fumarate respiration takes place. Growth displayed via OD<sub>600</sub> shows rise in the first three days of <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Protocols#AnaerobicCultivation">anaerobic cultivation</a>. After that cells were induced via 0.1% rhamnose and 500 &mu;M IPTG. This leads to  a reduction in growth because of expression load and toxic effect of IPTG. Cultivation of <i>E. coli</i> wildtype also should be induced because of better comparability. The same effect could be observed in cultivation of <i>E. coli</i> with <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465102">BBa_1465102</a>, as shown in figure XXX. There is also a drop in growth characteristic detectable. Comparison of both growth characteristics are shown in figure XXX.

Revision as of 14:27, 17 October 2014



Module I - reverse microbial fuel cell (rMFC)

-->
Construction of an electrophilic E. coli strain

Our first module deals with the construction of an E. coli strain, which is able to accept electrons stimulating its metabolism. We regard on two different electron transfer systems: direct and indirect electron transfer.
Direct electron transfer in bacteria is a very complex and not completely cleared up so far. So we focused on the indirect electron transfer via a mediator, which is reduced at the electrode in a electrobiochemical reactor and would be reoxidized again by bacterial cells.(Park et al., 1999) In gram-negative bacteria E. coli there are two membranes with a periplasmatic space between, which has to break through in the course of electron transfer.
We worked on three different mediators: neutral red, bromphenol blue and cytochromes. Additionally we construct an electropholic E. coli strain, which shows an increased metabolic activity growing with electric power as has been proved in our H-cell reactor (Park et al., 1999).
The electron transfer system consists of different steps. First of all the reduced mediator has to be cross the outer membrane of E. coli cell. For that we use outer membrane porine OprF (BBa_K1172507) provided by iGEM Team Bielefeld-Germany 2013. Crossing the periplasmatic space, the mediator adsorb at inner membrane of E. coli cell. The mediator functioned as electron donor for over expressed fumarate reductase. In this step succinate is produced in the cytoplasm. Reduction of fumarate into succinate creates a loop into the citric acid cycle, because succinate would be reoxidized again by succiante dehydrogenase. In that reaction electron are transferred to FAD+ generating FADH2, which enter the electron transport chain. The electron transport achieve proton translocation over the inner bacterial membrane. The proton motoric force is used by ATP synthase. Generated ATP effects an increasing metabolic activity.

E. coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF strain

We invastigated the effect of C4 carboxylate transporter dcuB knockout on E. coli KRX. Furthermore we show the integration of outer membrane porine OprF (BBa_K1172507) into bacterial genome by replacing gene of E. coli C4 carboxylate antiporter dcuB. So we did knockout and insertion in a one-step process. Successful knockout of dcuB antiporter and simultaneous insertion of BBa_K1172507 was shown with PCR analysis, DNA sequencing and phenotypic investigation, for expample Biolog analysis, anaerobic cultivation in M9 minimal media with fumarate supplemented. Substrates and products were analyzed by HPLC. The electrobiochemical behavior of E. coli KRX with knocked out C4 carboxylate antiporter dcuB was tested in a H-cell reactor.

Preparation of knockout deletion cassette

We create an E. coli knockout strain with GeneBridge. We decide to knock out C4 carboxylate transporter dcuB to prevent succinate export. Besides we insert outer membrane porines OprF (BBa_K1172507) into the genome. Both could be realized with Genebridge RedET-System. For simultaneous knockout and insertion a deletion cassette hast to be designed and established. We used overlap extension PCR to amplifie the complete deletion cassette (Bryksin & Matsumura, 2010). We used kanamycin as antibiotic selective marker amplified from the plasmid Flp705 using the Genebridge RedET-System protocoll. We designed Primer (BBa_K1465107, BBa_K1465108, BBa_K1465109, BBa_K1465110) with complementary 5´extensions for both fragments to connect them in overlap extension PCR. The amplified deletion cassette has homologous sites for recombination with the dcuB gene in E. coli KRX genome.

PCR analysis

Gene of C4 carboxylate transporter dcuB, which exchange fumarate against succinate, is about the size of 1341 bp. We amplified genome area of dcuB gene with primer, which bind about 530 bp upstream and 520 bp downstream of dcuB gene. So E. coli KRX bring out a PCR product of about 2391 bp, which could be demonstrated by agarose gelelectrophorese. However E. coli KRX knockout strain (E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF) show a 4046 bp PCR product analyzed by agarose gelelectrophoresis. Figure XXX shows the result of agarose gelelectrophoresis with E. coli KRX wildtype and the modified strain E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF. PCR product of E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF genome amplified with primer dcuB_del_kon1 and dcuB_del_kon2 (4046 bp) is composed of antibiotic cassette (1637 bp), BBa_K1172507 (1359 bp) and upstream and downstream spacer elements (520 bp and 530 bp).

Sequencing

DNA sequencing of deletion cassette from E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF shows expected results.

NPN-Assay

Activity test of outer membrane porin OprF (BBa_K1172507) in E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF was investigated with NPN-Uptake-Assay (Cheng et al., 2005).
1-N-Phenylnaphthylamine (NPN) changes fluorescence activity between aqueous and hydrophobic milieu. There is only minor fluorescence in aqueous solution, but the transport in hydrophobic periplasmatic space causes an increased fluorescence. So NPN fluorescence is a good indicator for membrane permeability. Expression of outer membrane porines OprF effect an increasing membrane permeability.(Loh et al., 1984)


Figure XXX: Results of NPN-Uptake-Assay. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX Wildtype and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172507, BBa_K1172502 and Escherichia coli KRX with genome integrated oprF gene (E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF).
Figure XXX shows the result of NPN-Uptake-Assay. Higher fluorescence emission and higher membrane permeability could be observed with increasing promotor strength for OprF. Genome integrated oprF shows mid-level fluorescence emission and membramne permeability. Highest fluorescence level could be measured with oprF gene on high-copy pSB1C3 plasmid under control of T7 promotor.
Genome coded OprF show almost the same membrane permeability as constitutive expressed oprF with BBa_K1172507. Even there seems to be a marginal higher expression of genome integrated oprF in contrast to plasmid coded oprF although se same constitutive promotor (BBa_J23104) is used. This could be explained by physiological condition of the cell. Constitutive expression of high-copy oprF causes cell stress. Protein expression could be automatically downregulated by the cells. Single-copy genome integrated oprF show minor expression level, therefor cell stress is also smaller. As a consequence E. coli cells show a more effective expression of outer membrane porin OprF adjusted on physiological cell condition.

Phenotypic characterization with Biolog® system

Biolog® Microbial ID System is a simple and fast method for characterization of different bactaria, yeast and fungi species. It based on respiration in the presence of different metabolic relevant substances for expample carbon sources, nitrogen sources or toxines. The system uses redox chemistry wherein a tetrazolium dye is reduced when significant respiration occurs. Tetrazolium dye change its colour, because the cells generate reductive conditions in the course of electron transport chain. Tetrazolium cation is reduced to formazan by dehydrogenase from respiratory complex I. This allow a statement if respiration occurs in the presence of different substances.

E. coli KRX Wildtype and E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF were incubated in Biolog® system to test respiration in the presence of fumarate. It has to be shown that E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF shows no activity in the presence of fumarate because knockout of C4 carboxylate transporter dcuB makes fumarate uptake impossible for E. coli cells.
The results of Biolog® analysis are shown in figure XXX.


Figure XXX: Results of Biolog® analysis of E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF in comparison to Escherichia coli KRX wildtype. Respiratory activity is shown under influence of fumarate.

Biolog® analysis shows that there is no significant respiratory activity of E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF in the presence of fumarate among the first 35 hours of incubation. Later on respiration occurs up to 50% of maximal respiratory activity of E. coli KRX wildtype after 48 hours of incubation at 37°C.
The results in figure XXX demonstrate that knockout of C4 carboxylate antiporter DcuB was successful. Respiration activity after 35 hours could be explained by a change in metabolism of E. coli cells. Based on cell stress in minimal medium bacteria use other ways for respiration in the presence of fumarate. It is possible that an other transporter compensate activity of DcuB transporter, but activation and expression of alternative pathways require a space of time. This could explain the lag of time until respiration of E.coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF occurs.
Anaerobic cultivation

We cultivated E. coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF under anaerobic conditions. We used M9 minimal medium with 50 mM glucose. Among growth characteristic we focused on metabolite analysis. Under anaerobic conditions E. coli cells use different alternative electron acceptors instead of oxygen. In part the bacteria use fumarate respiration, whereby fumarate is reduced into succinate. There are also other potential pathways for bacteria to release their electrons, for example anorganic compounds like nitrate (NO3-) or sulfate (SO42-).(Gottschalk et al., 1986) As a result of this the expected level of produced succinate is very low. We analyzed succinate concentration and glucose concentration in culture supernatant via HPLC.

We expect succinate production of E. coli KRX wildtype, but E. coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF should not release succinate into the media because C4 carboxylate transporter dcuB is knocked out. As a positive control we use E. coli ΔdcuB749::kan, an E. coli strain with a reviewed knockout in dcuB gene. This strain also should not show any succinate transport into the medium.



Figure XXX: Results of anaerobic cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX wildtype in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM glucose. Glucose and succinate concentration were measured with HPLC.


Figure XXX: Results of anaerobic cultivation of Escherichia coli ΔdcuB749::kan in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM glucose. Glucose and succinate concentration were measured with HPLC.


Figure XXX: Results of anaerobic cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM glucose. Glucose and succinate concentration were measured with HPLC.


Figure XXX: Results of anaerobic cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM glucose as compared to Escherichia coli KRX wildtype. Glucose and succinate concentration were measured with HPLC.

Figure XXX shows production of succinate by Escherichia coli KRX wildtype under anaerobic condition as expected. Succinate is released into the medium via C4 carboxylate transporter DcuB. Our constructed E. coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF strain shows no succinate export under anaerobic conditions displayed in figure XXX. This demonstrate a successful knockout of dcuB gene in E. coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF strain. As positive control we get an E. coli strain from the KEIO collection with a verified knockout in dcuB gene. Figure XXX shows the result of anaerobic cultivation and succinate concentration measurement of this E. coli strain. A very low succinate concetration in culture supernatant could be observed. In comparison to E. coli KRX wildtype there is a very low succinate export. Only traces of succinate could be measured attributed to a residual activity of DcuB antiporter or transport of succinate by other transporters with minor specifity.
Furthermore in Escherichia coli ΔdcuB749::kan the knockout is not over the complete dcuB gene. Insertion of kanamycin selection cassette was executed at position 749 of dcuB gene. So there could be a residual activity of DcuB because of residual expressed parts of antiporter protein. However knockout of dcuB in E. coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF is complete and residual activity is not possible as shown in figure XXX. Comparison between E. coli wildtype and E. coli KRX ΔdcuB::oprF is an obvious demonstration of completely functional knockout of C4 carboxylate antiporter dcuB.

Fumarate reductase (Frd) from Escherichia coli
Upon the expression of fumarate reductase Frd in E. coli we analyzed the metabolic behavior under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Successful expression of fumarate reductase Frd (BBa_1465102) could be proven via SDS-PAGE in combination with MALDI-TOF/MS. Activity of fumarate reductase displayed with HPLC analysis of fumarate consumption and succinate production in anaerobic cultivation of E. coli with BBa_1465102. Furthermore we investigated fumarate reductase activity in different E. coli strains by phenotypic MicroArray (PM) analysis with a Biolog® system.

SDS-PAGE

The fumarate reductase could be detected in purified membrane and periplasmatic protein fraction. Proteins were fractioned by cold osmotic shock of E. coli KRX at different steps after induction of protein expression. SDS-PAGE shows the expression of fumarate reductase in E. coli KRX under control of T7 promotor (BBa_1465102). Fumarate reductase with total molecular mass of 121 kD consists of four subunits. There are two large catalytic and watwer-soluble subunits, flavoprotein (66 kDa) and iron-sulfur protein (27 kDa). Two small membrane associated subunits (15 and 13 kDa) are not detectable in SDS-PAGE. (Iverson et al., 1999).
Figure XXX shows the result of SDS-PAGE of isolated membrane proteins via cold osmotic shock of E. coli KRX with BBa_1465102. There are membrane protein fractions at different times after induction of BBa_1465102 displayed.


Figure XXX: Results of SDS-PAGE of purified membrane protein from Escherichia coli BBa_1465102 via cold osmotic shock.

SDS-PAGE shows a significantly higher protein concentration in membrane extracts from E. coli expressing Frd under control of T7 promoter (BBa_1465102) after induction. This is caused by usually higher membrane protein concentration of cultivated cells. Nevertheless, a strong overexpression band can be observed at the expected Frd size (subunit A) of about 66 kDa for BBa_1465102, which can be traced back on strong expression and overproduction of Frd. Besides a overexpression band can be recognized at size about 45 kDA. This could be explained by dimer formation of two Frd subunits, for example subunit B (27 kDa) with subunit C oder D (13 and 15 kDA). That implies that subunit B build up stable dimers with small membrane associated subunits C and D of about 40 kDa respectively 42 kDa. There seems to be no dimers of subunit A with other parts of Frd.
Anaerobic cultivation

We cultivate E. coli KRX with BBa_1465102 under anaerobic conditions to characterize activity of fumarate reductase Frd (BBa_1465102) under controll of T7 promotor. We used M9 minimal medium with 50 mM xylose as carbon source and 50 mM fumarate as substrate of fumarate reductase Frd. We focused on growth characteristic and metabolite analysis. Under anaerobic conditions E. coli cells use different alternative electron acceptors instead of oxygen. In part the bacteria use fumarate respiration, whereby fumarate is reduced into succinate. There are also other potential pathways for bacteria to release their electrons, for example anorganic compounds like nitrate (NO3-) or sulfate (SO42-). As a result of this the expected level of produced succinate is very low. We analyzed fumarate and succinate concentration in culture supernatant via HPLC analysis.

We expect mid-level succinate production of E. coli KRX wildtype under anaerobic conditions. Strong expression of Frd (BBa_1465102) leads to an increasing succinate production and fumarate consumption.
As a control we use E. coli ΔfdrA730::kan, an E. coli strain with a reviewed knockout in frdA gene. This strain does not show any fumarate reductase activity and so succinate concentraion should be on a low level.
Furthermore we transform BBa_1465102 into E. coli ΔfdrA730::kan to compensate functional defect of fumarate reductase in this strain.



Figure XXX: Results of anaerobic cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX wildtype in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.


Figure XXX: Results of anaerobic cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX wildtype with strong expression of frd (BBa_1465102) in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.


Figure XXX: Growth of Escherichia coli KRX wildtype with strong expression of frd (BBa_1465102) compared to Escherichia coli KRX wildtype under anaerobic condition in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.


Figure XXX: Comparison of fumarate consumption and succinate production in anaerobic cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX wildtype and i>Escherichia coli KRX wildtype with strong expression of frd (BBa_1465102) in M9 minimal medium with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate. Fumarate and succinate concentration were measured via HPLC.


As expected figure XXX shows production of succinate by Escherichia coli KRX wildtype under anaerobic condition with 50 mM xylose and 50 mM fumarate as sole carbon sources. Under anaerobic conditions fumarate respiration takes place. Growth displayed via OD600 shows rise in the first three days of anaerobic cultivation. After that cells were induced via 0.1% rhamnose and 500 μM IPTG. This leads to a reduction in growth because of expression load and toxic effect of IPTG. Cultivation of E. coli wildtype also should be induced because of better comparability. The same effect could be observed in cultivation of E. coli with BBa_1465102, as shown in figure XXX. There is also a drop in growth characteristic detectable. Comparison of both growth characteristics are shown in figure XXX.
Phenotypic characterization with Biolog® system

Biolog® Microbial ID System is a simple and fast method for characterization of different bactaria, yeast and fungi species. It based on respiration in the presence of different metabolic relevant substances for expample carbon sources, nitrogen sources or toxines. The system uses redox chemistry wherein a tetrazolium dye is reduced when significant respiration occurs. Tetrazolium dye change its colour, because the cells generate reductive conditions in the course of electron transport chain. Tetrazolium cation is reduced to formazan by dehydrogenase from respiratory complex I. This allow a statement if respiration occurs in the presence of different substances.

We tested the influence of fumarate on Escherichia coli KRX wildtype and E. coli KRX with BBa_1465102. To show activity of fumarate reductase under controll of T7 promotor (BBa_1465102), we incubated cells with fumarate in Biolog® system for 48h. Results of Biolog ® analysis are shown in figure XXX.

E. coli KRX wildtype and E. coli KRX with BBa_1465102 show respiratory activity in the presence of fumarate. As unexpected E. coli KRX wildtype shows higher activity on fumarate as compared to BBa_1465102. Respiration of E. coli KRX with BBa_1465102 seems to be fewer and occurs subsequently in comparison to wildtype.


Figure XXX: Results of Biolog® analysis of E.coli KRX with BBa_1465102 in comparison to Escherichia coli KRX wildtype. Respiratory activity is shown under influence of fumarate.

H-cell reactor

Fumarate reductase activity could be demonstrated by cultivation of E. coli KRX BBa_K1465102 in our electrobiochemical H-cell reactor. We show that expression of fumarate reductase increases electron transfer into E. coli cells via neutral red as a mediator.

Fumarate reductase (Fum) from Actinobacillus succinogenes

Beside fumarate reductase (Frd) from Escherichia coli we worked on fumarate reductase (Fum) from Actinobacillus succinogenes (Fum). As published by Park et al., 1999 fumarate reductase from A. succinogenes shows high activity accepting electrical reduced neutral red a electron donor and so stimulate metabolism in a electrobiochemical reactor system. So we planed to compare these two different enzymes with regard to activity accepting neutral red or bromphenol blue as alternative electron aceptor in our electrobiochemical reactor system.

Adaptation of fum gene codon usage to E. coli KRX

The fumarate reductase Fum from A. succinogenes just as Frd from E. coli is a membrane associated enzyme, which consists of four subunits. Because there was no full genomic DNA available from A. succinogenes, we ordered Fum gene via custom gene synthesis at gBlocks® Gene Fragments. Bevor ordering DNA we ensured of optimal codon usage adapted to E. coli KRX by jcat online optimization tool. Furthermore we checked sequence for illegal restriction sites (EcoRI, PstI, NotI, XbaI) and eliminated them if required.
Because sequence is too large for synthesis in one part with gBlocks® system, we devided sequence of fum into two different parts: fumA and fumBCD (also called fumB). FumA includes coding sequence of fumarate reductase (Fum) subunit A (BBa_K1465103). However fumB consists of fumarate reductase subunits B, C and D (BBa_K1465104). FUmarate reductase ubunits get their own ribosome binding site respectively.

Cloning fumarate Reductase Fum

The fumarate reductase Fum from A. succinogenes

Mediators

We use different mediators for electron transfer in our electrobiochemical reactor system.

Neutral Red

We tested neutral red as a mediator for electron transfer into bacterial cells. The electrochemical behavior of neutral red was analyzed in a H-cell reactor.

Bromphenol Blue

Cytochromes


Reference