Team:UESTC-China/result
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 556: | Line 556: | ||
<div align="center"><img style="width:60% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/83/Result_5.jpg"> | <div align="center"><img style="width:60% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/83/Result_5.jpg"> | ||
<p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:500px; color:#1b1b1b;"> | <p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:500px; color:#1b1b1b;"> | ||
- | + | ||
<strong>Fig.5</strong> | <strong>Fig.5</strong> | ||
positive tobacco seedlings of each transgenic lines. | positive tobacco seedlings of each transgenic lines. | ||
Line 590: | Line 590: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Enhanced | + | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Enhanced formaldehyde Tolerance </h1><br/> |
- | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">The transgenic plants and wildtype, which had been grown separately in sealed boxes, were exposed to | + | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">The transgenic plants and wildtype, which had been grown separately in sealed boxes, were exposed to formaldehyde evaporated from a micro tube (0.5ml) containing formaldehyde solution (37%, 50ul) (Fig.8). One week later we observed the phenotype of transgeneic plants and widetype (Fig.9). We found that the transgenetic seedling is stronger than wildtype after formaldehyde exposure.This indicates that production of HPS/PHI, Faldh and FDH enhanced formaldehyde tolerance of transgenic seedlings to some extent.</p> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9e/12.png"> | <div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9e/12.png"> | ||
<p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:1100px; color:#1b1b1b;"> | <p style="position:relative; left:0px; padding:15 5px; font-size:20px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: calibri; text-align:justify; width:1100px; color:#1b1b1b;"> | ||
<strong>Fig.8</strong> | <strong>Fig.8</strong> | ||
- | The transgenic plants (A) and wildtype (B), which had been grown separately in sealed boxes, were exposed to | + | The transgenic plants (A) and wildtype (B), which had been grown separately in sealed boxes, were exposed to formaldehyde evaporated from a micro tube (0.5ml) containing formaldehyde solution (37%,10μl) |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 610: | Line 610: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Enhanced | + | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Enhanced formaldehyde Absorbance</h1><br/> |
- | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">We detected the concentration of gaseous formaldehyde evaporated from a micro tube (0.5ml) containing | + | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">We detected the concentration of gaseous formaldehyde evaporated from a micro tube (0.5ml) containing formaldehyde solution (37%,10ul) and made a curve (Fig.10) about relationship between formaldehyde concentration and time. And we saw a linear relationship between formaldehyde concentration and time before formaldehyde is saturated. For quantity result, we used a formaldehyde detector to detect the concentration of gaseous formaldehyde (Fig.11). The transgenic plants and wildtype, which had been grown separately in sealed boxes, were exposed to formaldehyde evaporated from a micro tube (0.5ml) containing formaldehyde solution (37%, 50ul) for about 2 weeks. Two weeks later, the covers of the plant boxes were removed and quickly replaced with covers equipped with formaldehyde dose-monitoring tubes in order to determine roughly the gaseous formaldehyde levels remaining in the boxes. We have not got the precise data results now, and this work is to be continued.</p> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/3c/Graph1.png"> | <div align="center"><img style="width:50% ;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/3c/Graph1.png"> | ||
Line 629: | Line 629: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Transit Peptides Affect | + | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Transit Peptides Affect Formaldehyde Degrading Efficiency </h1> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">HPS, PHI, and FDH are located in chloroplast, while FALDH plays a role in cytoplasm. So we used transit peptides to locate the productions of these genes. We hope to know the effects of transit peptide on degrading | + | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">HPS, PHI, and FDH are located in chloroplast, while FALDH plays a role in cytoplasm. So we used transit peptides to locate the productions of these genes. We hope to know the effects of transit peptide on degrading formaldehyde. So we exposed transgenic tobaccos with and without transit peptides to formaldehyde (37%, 50ul). However, there are no obvious phenotype difference compairing different transgenic lines because time limited.</p> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Different Genes Affect | + | <h1 class="SectionTitles" style="width:1100px; ">Different Genes Affect Formaldehyde Degrading Efficiency </h1> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">To test which enzymes play the most important role in pathway of metabolizing | + | <p style="color:#1b1b1b;">To test which enzymes play the most important role in pathway of metabolizing formaldehyde, we constructed mono-gene expression vectors to express each enzyme individually. We also constructed multi-gene expression vectors to test whether the ability of metabolizing formaldehyde of transgenic tobacco enhanced. Then these transgenic tobaccos were exposed to formaldehyde (37%, 50ul). However, we have not got obvious phenotype difference among transgenic lines, because there is not enough time</p> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> |
Revision as of 11:42, 17 October 2014