Team:Freiburg/Content/Results/Light system
From 2014.igem.org
Mirja Harms (Talk | contribs) |
Mirja Harms (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<div class="row category-row"> | <div class="row category-row"> | ||
<div class="col-sm-6"> | <div class="col-sm-6"> | ||
- | <p> As the function of the light system, we use, is really important for the function of our whole system, we tested two different light systems. The red light system is based | + | <p> As the function of the light system, we use, is really important for the function of our whole system, we tested two different light systems. The red light system is based on based on the Arabidopsis thaliana protein phytochrome B (PhyB) that binds to the phytochrome-interacting factor 6 (PIF6) after illumination with red light (660 nm), whereas the blue light system contains a domain from Avena sativa (AsLOV2) that is assessible to other parts of the system upon illumination with blue light (465 nm). |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p>Since, it is known that the red light system works better in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, we used this cell line to test the function of this light system. In order to investigate the functionality of the blue light system, we tested both, CHO cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. As reporter the gene seap was transfected together with the genes for the light systems (red light system: PKM006, PKM078; blue light system: PKM292, PKM297, PKM084). A SEAP-assay was performed after illumination. Regarding SEAP concentrations in the supernatant of each sample two important findings were archived. First, the blue light system works much more efficient than the red light system; and the blue light system works better with HEK cells than with CHO cells (Fig.1). | <p>Since, it is known that the red light system works better in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, we used this cell line to test the function of this light system. In order to investigate the functionality of the blue light system, we tested both, CHO cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. As reporter the gene seap was transfected together with the genes for the light systems (red light system: PKM006, PKM078; blue light system: PKM292, PKM297, PKM084). A SEAP-assay was performed after illumination. Regarding SEAP concentrations in the supernatant of each sample two important findings were archived. First, the blue light system works much more efficient than the red light system; and the blue light system works better with HEK cells than with CHO cells (Fig.1). | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
- | <h2 id="Results-LightSystem- | + | <h2 id="Results-LightSystem-SEAP as Reporter">SEAP as Reporter</h2> |
<p>In order to test the capability of the blue light system for pattern generation, we transfected HEK293 cells with the appropriate plasmids (PKM292 and PKM297) using seap as a reporter gene (PKM084). Cells were transfected in suspension and seeded on 96 well plates afterwards. Single wells of these plates were covered with a photo mask that prevents illumination with blue light. Since, all other wells on the plate were exposed to the blue light, SEAP expression was induced in these wells. SEAP that was secreted into the culture medium leads to colour changing from red to yellow after addition of pNPP (chromogenic substrate) by its phosphorylation. | <p>In order to test the capability of the blue light system for pattern generation, we transfected HEK293 cells with the appropriate plasmids (PKM292 and PKM297) using seap as a reporter gene (PKM084). Cells were transfected in suspension and seeded on 96 well plates afterwards. Single wells of these plates were covered with a photo mask that prevents illumination with blue light. Since, all other wells on the plate were exposed to the blue light, SEAP expression was induced in these wells. SEAP that was secreted into the culture medium leads to colour changing from red to yellow after addition of pNPP (chromogenic substrate) by its phosphorylation. | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
- | + | ||
</section> | </section> |
Revision as of 01:50, 17 October 2014
The light system
One advantage of our system, the spatial resolution by infecting only distinct areas in a mammalian cell culture with our viral vector, was archived by the use of different light systems. We induced the expression of the mCAT-1 receptor in non-murine cell lines by illumination them with light of a special wave length. Since, the viral vector only infect cells that express the mCAT-1 receptor on their surfaces, we transferred genes into distinct areas of an otherwise homogenous cell layer using this principle.
Function of the Light Systems
As the function of the light system, we use, is really important for the function of our whole system, we tested two different light systems. The red light system is based on based on the Arabidopsis thaliana protein phytochrome B (PhyB) that binds to the phytochrome-interacting factor 6 (PIF6) after illumination with red light (660 nm), whereas the blue light system contains a domain from Avena sativa (AsLOV2) that is assessible to other parts of the system upon illumination with blue light (465 nm).
Since, it is known that the red light system works better in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, we used this cell line to test the function of this light system. In order to investigate the functionality of the blue light system, we tested both, CHO cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. As reporter the gene seap was transfected together with the genes for the light systems (red light system: PKM006, PKM078; blue light system: PKM292, PKM297, PKM084). A SEAP-assay was performed after illumination. Regarding SEAP concentrations in the supernatant of each sample two important findings were archived. First, the blue light system works much more efficient than the red light system; and the blue light system works better with HEK cells than with CHO cells (Fig.1).
The blue light system is very effective in activating an existing reporter, like the gene for seap, brought into the cell before illumination. As we know that the duration of illuminating the system with blue light (452 nm) is critical for its efficiency, we tested various time spans for illumination. Our results indicate that five hours of illumination lead to the highest activation level of SEAP expression.
Another important finding was the specificity of the blue light system. As we always have a dark control in our experiments, we determined almost no activation of the SEAP reporter in these samples leading to a very low background level in our system.
SEAP as Reporter
In order to test the capability of the blue light system for pattern generation, we transfected HEK293 cells with the appropriate plasmids (PKM292 and PKM297) using seap as a reporter gene (PKM084). Cells were transfected in suspension and seeded on 96 well plates afterwards. Single wells of these plates were covered with a photo mask that prevents illumination with blue light. Since, all other wells on the plate were exposed to the blue light, SEAP expression was induced in these wells. SEAP that was secreted into the culture medium leads to colour changing from red to yellow after addition of pNPP (chromogenic substrate) by its phosphorylation.
First we generated a coarse pattern (fig.) realizing that by scattered light also covered wells close to illuminated wells were exposed to light. This was leading to an unclear pattern. However, we managed to give an idea of the desired pattern.
Since, it was essential to completely prevent light exposure on covered plates we tested 96 well plates with optical separated wells. As shown in fig. we could generate patterns with sharp contours.
Colour changing of pNPP in cell culture medium could be measured at 405 nm in a plate reader. Calculating the gradient of light absorption we also generated patterns using a data matrix (Excel) by setting a distinct threshold, thus making pattern recognition easier.